Comparison of the Hemodynamic Performance of Percutaneous and Surgical Bioprostheses for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 53, Issue 20, 2009, Pages 1883-1891

  Clavel, Marie Annick ^a   Webb, John G ^b   Pibarot, Philippe ^a   Altwegg, Lukas ^b   Dumont, Eric ^a   Thompson, Chris ^b   De Larochellière, Robert ^a   Doyle, Daniel ^a   Masson, Jean Bernard ^b   Bergeron, Sebastien ^a   Bertrand, Olivier F ^a   Rodés Cabau, Josep ^a  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; aortic valve replacement; bioprosthesis; heart valve prosthesis; hemodynamics; percutaneous aortic valve implantation

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; BODY MASS; BODY SURFACE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX RATIO; STENT; TRANSLUMINAL VALVULOPLASTY; VASCULAR RING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 65149088915     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.060     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Pibarot P., and Dumesnil J.G. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 92 (2006) 10224-10229
2. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
3. Mohty D., Malouf J.F., Girard S.E., Schaff H.V., Grill D.E., and Enriquez-Sarano M.E. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St. Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113 (2006) 420-426
4. Cribier A., Eltchaninoff H., Tron C., et al. Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve. Mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 1214-1223
5. Webb J.G., Pasupati S., Humphries K., et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116 (2007) 755-763
6. Walther T., Simon P., Dewey T., et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation. Multicentre experience. Circulation 116 (2007) I240-I245
7. Rodés-Cabau J., Dumont E., DelaRochellière R., et al. Feasibility and initial results of percutaneous aortic valve implantation including selection of the transfemoral or transapical approach in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 102 (2008) 1240-1246
8. Svensson L.G., Dewey T., Kapadia S., et al. United States feasibility study of transcatheter insertion of a stented aortic valve by the left ventricular apex. Ann Thorac Surg 86 (2008) 46-55
9. Grube E., Schuler G., Buellesfeld L., et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 50 (2007) 69-76
10. Zegdi R., Ciobotaru V., Noghin M., et al. Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent?. Results from a human anatomic study in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 51 (2008) 579-584
11. Zoghbi W.A., Enriquez-Sarano M., Foster M., et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 (2003) 777-802
12. Perry G.J., Helmcke F., Nanda N.C., Byard C., and Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 9 (1987) 952-959
13. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Lemieux M., Cartier P., Metras J., and Durand L.G. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 7 (1998) 211-218
14. Tasca G., Brunelli F., and Cirillo M. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 79 (2005) 505-510
15. Rao V., Jamieson W.R.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival following aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102 (2000) III5-III9
16. Tasca G., Mhagna Z., Perotti S., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 113 (2006) 570-576
17. Dumesnil J.G., Leblanc M.H., Cartier P.C., et al. Hemodynamic features of the Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 66 Suppl (1998) 130-133
18. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Jobin J., Cartier P., Honos G., and Durand L.G. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with aortic bioprosthesis valve. Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 34 (1999) 1609-1617
19. Perez de Arenaza D., Lees B., Flather M., et al. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis. Effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation 112 (2005) 2696-2702
20. Ali A., Halstead J.C., Cafferty F., et al. Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves?. A prospective randomized trial. Circulation 114 (2006) I535-I540
21. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Cartier P.C., Metras J., and Lemieux M. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 71 Suppl (2001) 265-268
22. Lopez S., Mathieu P., Pibarot P., et al. Does the use of stentless aortic valves in subcoronary position prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch for small aortic annulus?. J Card Surg 23 (2008) 331-335
23. Moon M.R., Pasque M.K., Munfakh N.A., et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 481-488
24. Mothy D., Dumesnil J.G., Echahidi N., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 53 (2009) 39-47
25. Selvanayagam J.B., Petersen S.E., Francis J.M., et al. Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery on reversible and irreversible myocardial injury: a randomized trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers. Circulation 109 (2004) 345-350
26. Rallidis L.S., Moyssakis I.E., Ikonomidis I., and Nihoyannopoulos P. Natural history of early paraprosthetic regurgitation: a five-year follow-up. Am Heart J 138 (1999) 351-357
27. O'Rourke D.J., Palac R.T., Malenka D.J., Marrin C.A., Arbuckle B.E., and Plehn J.F. Outcome of mild periprosthetic regurgitation detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 38 (2001) 163-166
28. Goldbarg S.H., and Halperin J.L. Aortic regurgitation: disease progression and management. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 5 (2008) 269-279