Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: Which is the best method?

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 615-620

  Bleiziffer, Sabine ^a   Eichinger, Walter B ^a   Hettich, Ina ^a   Guenzinger, Ralf ^a   Ruzicka, Daniel ^a   Bauernschmitt, Robert ^a   Lange, Ruediger ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA INDEX; GEOMETRIC ORIFICE AREA; GEOMETRY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; AGED; AORTA VALVE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; MALE; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; STANDARD;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 34247847791     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.102764     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20-4.
2. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:211-18.
3. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003;108:983-8.
4. Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis, Circulation 2006;113:570-6.
5. Mohty-Echahidi D, Malouf JF, Girard SE, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 2006;113:420-6.
6. Kulik A, Burwash IG, Kapila V, et al. Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 2006;114:1553-8.
7. Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1036-44.
8. Milano AD, De Carlo M, Mecozzi G, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up, Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:37-43.
9. Walther T, Rastan A, Falk V, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:15-19.
10. Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:505-10.
11. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, et al. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119, 2000;119:963-74.
12. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:783-96.
13. Koch CG, Khandwala F, Estafanous FG, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2005;111:3221-9.
14. Fernandez J, Chen C, Laub GW, et al. Predictive value of prosthetic valve area index for early and late clinical results after valve replacement with the St Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Circulation 1996;94:11109-12.
15. Knez I, Rienmuller R, Maier R, et al. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:797-805.
16. Roo V, Jamieson WR, Ivanov J, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000;102:1115-9.
17. Howell NJ, Keogh BE, Barnet V, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:10-14.
18. Richards KL. Assessment of aortic and pulmonic stenosis by echocardiography. Circulation 1991;84:1182-7.
19. Rahimtoola SH. Is severe valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (VP-PM) associated with a higher mortality? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:1.
20. Koertke H, Seifert D, Drewek-Platena S, et al. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic ADVANTAGE prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position: echocardiographic evaluation at one year. J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:348-53.
21. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-41.
22. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:265-8.
23. Marquez S, Hon RT, Yoganathan AP. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 2001;10:802-11.
24. Fradet G, Bleese N, Burgess J, et al. Mosaic valve international clinical trial: early performance results. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S273-7.
25. Kleine P, Perthel M, Hasenkam JM, et al. High-intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical aortic valves. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:360-3.
26. Flameng W, Meuris B, Herijgers P, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:530-6.
27. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Guenzinger R, et al. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;53:226-30.
28. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger W, Bleiziffer S, et al. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:2054-60.
29. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC, et al. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). ACC/ AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:672-707.
30. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1608- 12.
31. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, et al. Reply. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1088.