Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in the Elderly: Survival, Ventricular Mass Regression, and Quality of Life

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1791-1797

  Vicchio, Mariano ^a,b   Della Corte, Alessandro ^a,b   De Santo, Luca Salvatore ^a,b   De Feo, Marisa ^a,b   Caianiello, Giuseppe ^a,b   Scardone, Michelangelo ^a,b   Cotrufo, Maurizio ^a,b  

^a SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^b MONALDI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA INDEX; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE SIZE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS PATIENT MISMATCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 36; SURVIVAL TIME; THERAPEUTIC ERROR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BODY SURFACE AREA; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; ITALY; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUALITY OF LIFE; REFERENCE VALUES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 56049114889     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Rahimtoola S. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 58 (1978) 20-24
2. Lund O., Erlandsen M., Dørup I., Emmertsen K., Flø C., and Jensen F.T. Predictable changes in left ventricular mass and function during ten years valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 13 (2004) 357-368
3. Rao V., Jamieson W.R., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102 suppl 3 (2000) III5-III9
4. Monrad E.S., Hess O.M., Tomoyuki M., Nonogi H., Corin W.J., and Krayenbuehl H.P. Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 77 (1988) 1345-1355
5. Tasca G., Brunelli F., Cirillo M., et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 79 (2005) 505-510
6. Pibarot P., Honos G., Durand L.G., and Dumesnil J.G. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol 12 (1996) 379-387
7. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
8. Dumesnil J.G., Honos G.N., Lemieux M., and Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 16 (1990) 637-643
9. Howell N.J., Keogh B.E., Barnet V., et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 (2006) 10-14
10. Mothy-Echahidi D., Malouf J.F., Girard S.E., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical Mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113 (2006) 420-426
11. Roscitano A., Benedetto U., Sciangula A., et al. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29 (2006) 139-143
12. Medalion B., Blackstone E.H., Lytle B.W., White J., Arnold J.H., and Cosgrove D.M. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119 (2000) 963-974
13. Medalion B., Lytle B.W., McCarthy P.M., et al. Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: are small valves bad?. Ann Thorac Surg 67 (1999) 1543-1544
14. Borger M.A., Carson S.M., Ivanov J., et al. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 80 (2005) 2180-2185
15. Ennker J., Rosendahl U., Albert A., Dumlu E., Ennker I.C., and Florath I. Stentless bioprostheses in small aortic roots: impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival and quality of life. J Heart Valve Dis 14 (2005) 523-530
16. Santini F., Bertolini P., Montalbano G., et al. Hancock versus stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients older than 75 years. Ann Thorac Surg 66 6 suppl (1998) S99-S103
17. Molina J.E. Enlargement of the aortic annulus using a double-patch technique: a safe and effective method. Ann Thorac Surg 73 (2002) 667-670
18. Otaki M., Oku H., Nakamoto S., Kitayama H., Ueda M., and Matsumoto T. Two-directional aortic annular enlargement for aortic valve replacement in the small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 63 (1997) 261-263
19. Castro L.J., Arcidi Jr. J.M., Fisher A.L., and Gaudiani V.A. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 74 (2002) 31-36
20. Vicchio M., Della Corte A., De Feo M., et al. Quality of life after implantation of bileaflet prostheses in elderly patients: an anticoagulation work group experience. Ann Thorac Surg 84 (2007) 459-465
21. Edmunds Jr. L.H., Clark R.E., Cohn L.H., Grunkemeier G.L., Miller D.C., and Weisel R.D. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 62 (1996) 932-935
22. Lyons R.A., Perry H.M., and Littlepage B.N. Evidence for the validity of the short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing 23 (1994) 182-184
23. Moon M.R., Pasque M.K., Munfakh N.A., et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 481-488
24. Kirsch M.E., Tzvetkov B., Vermes E., Pouzet B., Sauvat S., and Loisance D. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm Medtronic mosaic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 14 (2005) 433-439
25. Ross J., and Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation 38 Suppl 1 (1968) 61-67
26. Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 32 (1998) 1486-1588
27. De Feo M., Onorati F., Renzulli A., et al. Mechanical valve prosthesis is a valid option for aortic valve replacement in the elderly. J Heart Valve Dis 13 (2004) 103-108
28. Florath I., Albert A., Rosendahl U., Alexander T., Ennker I.C., and Ennker J. Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves. Heart 91 (2005) 1023-1029
29. Van Nooten G., Caes F., Francois K., Van Belleghem Y., and Taeymans Y. Stentless or stented aortic valve implants in elderly patients?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15 (1999) 31-36 [Letters to the Editor: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:658]
30. Doss M., Martens S., Wood J.P., et al. Performance of stentless versus stented aortic valve bioprostheses in the elderly patient: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23 (2003) 299-304 [Letters to the Editor: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:335-6]
31. Hanayama N., Christakis G.T., Mallidi H.R., et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg 73 (2002) 1822-1829
32. Amarelli C., Della Corte A., Romano G., et al. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in isolated aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129 (2005) 512-517
33. Vicchio M., De Santo L.S., Della Corte A., et al. Aortic valve replacement with 19-mm bileaflet prostheses in the elderly: left ventricular mass regression and quality of life. J Heart Valve Dis 17 (2008) 216-221
34. Fuster R.G., Montero Argudo J.A., Albarova O.G., et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27 (2005) 441-449
35. Lund O., Emmertsen K., Dørup I., Jensen F.T., and Flø C. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during 10 years after valve replacement for aortic stenosis is related to the preoperative risk profile. Eur Heart J 24 (2003) 1437-1466
36. Sedrakyan A., Vaccarino V., Paltiel A.D., et al. Age does not limit quality of life improvement in cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003) 1208-1214
37. Pupello D.F., Bessone L.N., Lopez E., et al. Long-term results of the bioprostheses in the elderly patients: impact on quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg 71 suppl (2001) S244-S248
38. Koch C.G., Khandwala F., Estafanous F.G., Loop F.D., and Blackstone E.H. Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 111 (2005) 3221-3229
39. Goldsmith I., Lip G., and Patel R. A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20 (2001) 949-955
40. Rahimtoola S.H. Is severe valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (VP-PM) associated with a higher mortality?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 (2006) 1
41. Kadir I., Walsh C., Wilde P., Bryan A.J., and Angelini G.D. Comparison of exercise and dobutamine echocardiography in the haemodynamic assessment of small size mechanical aortic valve prostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21 (2002) 692-697