Explaining the user experience of recommender systems

User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

Volumn 22, Issue 4-5, 2012, Pages 441-504

  Knijnenburg, Bart P ^a,b   Willemsen, Martijn C ^b   Gantner, Zeno ^c   Soncu, Hakan ^d   Newell, Chris ^e  

^a Ringgold Standard Institution Informatics   (United States)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HILDESHEIM   (Germany)

^d MICROSOFT   (United States)

^e BBC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision support systems user experience; Decision making; Human computer interaction; Preference elicitation; Privacy; Recommender systems; User testing; User centric evaluation

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; DECISION SUPPORTS; FIELD TRIAL; PREDICTION ALGORITHMS; PREFERENCE ELICITATION; PRIVACY CONCERNS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS; SYSTEM ASPECTS; SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS; THREE COMPONENT; USER BEHAVIORS; USER EXPERIENCE; USER TESTING; USER-CENTRIC;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMERCE; DATA PRIVACY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84866024894     PISSN: 09241868     EISSN: 15731391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-011-9118-4     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Ackerman, M., Cranor, L., Reagle, J.: Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences. In: Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 1-8. Denver, CO (1999)
2. Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17, 734-749 (2005) (Pubitemid 40860454)
3. Adomavicius, G., Sankaranarayanan, R., Sen, S., Tuzhilin, A.: Incorporating contextual information inrecommender systems using a multidimensional approach. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 23, 103-145 (2005) (Pubitemid 40245827)
4. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 411-423 (1988)
5. Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y.: On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 16, 74-94 (1988)
6. Baudisch, P., Terveen, L.: Interacting with recommender systems. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 164. Pittsburgh, PA (1999)
7. Bechwati, N., Xia, L.: Do computers sweat? The impact of perceived effort of online decision aids on consumers' satisfaction with the decision process. J. Consum. Psychol. 13, 139-148 (2003) (Pubitemid 36703993)
8. Bentler, P.M., Bonett, D.G.: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 588-606 (1980)
9. Berendt, B., Teltzrow, M.: Addressing users' privacy concerns for improving personalization quality: towards an integration of user studies and algorithm evaluation. In: IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization, LNAI, vol. 3169, pp. 69-88. Acapulco, Mexico (2005)
10. Bharati, P.,Chaudhury, A.:Anempirical investigation of decision-making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems. Decis. Support Syst. 37, 187-197 (2004)
11. Bhatnagar, A., Ghose, S.: Online information search termination patterns across product categories and consumer demographics. J. Retail. 80, 221-228 (2004) (Pubitemid 39427316)
12. Bollen, D., Knijnenburg, B., Willemsen, M., Graus, M.: Understanding choice overload in recommender systems. In: Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender systems, pp. 63-70. Barcelona, Spain (2010)
13. Bradley, K., Smyth, B.: Improving recommendation diversity. In: Twelfth Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, pp. 85-94. Maynooth, Ireland (2001)
14. Brodie, C., Karat, C., Karat, J. : Creating an E-commerce environment where consumers are willing to share personal information. In: Karat, C.-M., Blom, J.O., Karat, J. (eds.) Designing Personalized User Experiences in eCommerce, pp. 185-206. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)
15. Burke, R.: Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Model. User-Adap. Int. 12, 331-370 (2002)
16. Cena, F., Vernero, F., Gena, C.: Towards a customization of rating scales in adaptive systems. In: 18th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, vol. 6075, pp. 369-374. Big Island, HI, LNCS (2010)
17. Chellappa, R., Sin, R.: Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumer's dilemma. Inf. Technol. Manag. 6, 181-202 (2005) (Pubitemid 40735257)
18. Chen, L., Pu, P.: Interaction design guidelines on critiquing-based recommender systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 19, 167-206 (2009)
19. Chen, L., Pu, P.: Critiquing-based recommenders: survey and emerging trends. User. Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22(1-2), 125-150 (2012)
20. Chin, D.: Empirical evaluation of user models and user-adapted systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 11, 181-194 (2001) (Pubitemid 32409030)
21. Cooke, A., Sujan, H., Sujan,M.,Weitz, B.A.: Marketing the unfamiliar: the role of context and item-specific information in electronic agent recommendations. J. Market. Res. 39, 488-497 (2002)
22. Cosley, D., Lam, S., Albert, I., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users' opinions. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 585-592. Ft. Lauderdale, FL (2003)
23. Cramer, H., Evers, V., van Someren, M., Ramlal, S., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., Wielinga, B.: The effects of transparency on trust and acceptance in interaction with a content-based art recommender. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 18, 455-496 (2008a)
24. Cramer, H., Evers, V., van Someren, M., Ramlal, S., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., Wielinga, B.: The effects of transparency on perceived and actual competence of a content-based recommender. In: CHI'08 Semantic Web User Interaction Workshop. Florence, Italy (2008b)
25. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Fransisco (1975)
26. Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319-340 (1989)
27. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982-1003 (1989)
28. Diehl, K., Kornish, L., Lynch, J. Jr.: Smart agents: when lower search costs for quality information increase price sensitivity. J. Consum. Res. 30, 56-71 (2003)
29. Felfernig, A., Teppan, E., Gula, B.: Knowledge-based recommender technologies for marketing and sales. Int. J. Pattern Recog. Artif. Intell. 21, 333-354 (2007) (Pubitemid 46572797)
30. Felix, D., Niederberger, C., Steiger, P., Stolze, M.: Feature-oriented vs. needs-oriented product access for non-expert online shoppers. In: IFIP Conference on Towards the E-Society: E-commerce, E-business, and E-government, pp. 399-406. Zürich, Switzerland (2001)
31. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)
32. Gena, C., Brogi, R., Cena, F., Vernero, F.: Impact of rating scales on user's rating behavior. In: 19th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, LNCS, vol. 6787, pp. 123-134. Girona, Spain (2011)
33. Harper F., Li X., Chen Y., Konstan J.: An economic model of user rating in an online recommender system. In: 10th International Conference on User Modeling, LNCS, vol. 3538, pp. 307-316. Edinburgh, UK (2005)
34. Hassenzahl, M.: The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Blythe, M.A., Monk, A.F., Overbeeke, K., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology, pp. 31-42. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2005)
35. Hassenzahl, M.: User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine, pp. 11-15.Metz, France (2008)
36. Häubl, G., Trifts, V.: Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: the effects of interactive decision aids. Market. Sci. 19, 4-21 (2000)
37. Häubl, G., Dellaert, B., Murray, K., Trifts, V. : Buyer behavior in personalized shopping environments. In: Karat, C.-M., Blom, J.O., Karat, J. (eds.) Designing Personalized User Experiences in eCommerce, pp. 207-229. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)
38. Hauser, J., Urban, G., Liberali, G., Braun, M.: Website morphing. Market. Sci. 28, 202-223 (2009)
39. Hayes, C., Massa, P., Avesani, P., Cunningham, P.: An on-line evaluation framework for recommender systems. In: AH'2002 Workshop on Recommendation and Personalization in E-Commerce, pp. 50-59. Málaga, Spain (2002)
40. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Explaining Collaborative filtering recommendations. In: 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 241-250. Philadelphia, PA (2000) (Pubitemid 32400055)
41. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Terveen, L., Riedl, J.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22, 5-53 (2004)
42. Ho, S.Y., Tam, K.Y.: An empirical examination of the effects of web personalization at different stages of decision making. Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact. 19, 95-112 (2005) (Pubitemid 41558505)
43. Hostler, R., Yoon, V., Guimaraes, T.: Assessing the impact of internet agent on end users' performance. Decis. Supp. Syst. 41, 313-323 (2005) (Pubitemid 41375580)
44. Hsu, C., Lu, H.: Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf. Manag. 41, 853-868 (2004)
45. Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model: A Multidiscip. J. 6, 1-55 (1999)
46. Hu, R., Pu, P.: A comparative user study on rating vs. personality quiz based preference elicitation methods. In: 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 367-371. Sanibel Island, FL (2009)
47. Hu, R., Pu, P.: A study on user perception of personality-based recommender systems. In: 18th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, LNCS, vol. 6075. pp. 291-302. Big Island, HI (2010)
48. Hu, R., Pu., P.: Enhancing recommendation diversity with organization interfaces. In: 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 347-350. Palo Alto, CA (2011)
49. Hu, Y., Koren, Y., Volinsky, C.: Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In: 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 263-272. Pisa, Italy (2008)
50. Huang, P., Lurie, N.H., Mitra, S.: Searching for experience on the web: an empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. J. Market. 73(2), 55-69 (2009)
51. Iyengar, S., Lepper, M.: When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?. J. Pers. Soci. Psychol. 79, 995-1006 (2000)
52. Jones, N., Pu, P., Chen, L.: How users perceive and appraise personalized recommendations. In: 17th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization Conference, vol. 5535, pp. 461-466. Trento, Italy, LNCS (2009)
53. Kamis, A., Davern, M.J.: Personalizing to product category knowledge: exploring the mediating effect of shopping tools on decision confidence. In: 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, HI (2004)
54. Kaplan, B., Duchon, D.: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. Mis Q. 12, 571-586 (1988)
55. Kautz, H., Selman, B., Shah, M.: Referral Web: combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Commun. ACM 40, 63-65 (1997) (Pubitemid 127441132)
56. Knijnenburg, B.P., Reijmer, N.J.M.,Willemsen, M.C.: Each to his own: howdifferent users call for different interaction methods in recommender systems. In: 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp.141-148. Chicago, IL (2011)
57. Knijnenburg, B.P., Willemsen, M.C.: Understanding the effect of adaptive preference elicitation methods on user satisfaction of a recommender system. In: Third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 381-384. New York, NY (2009)
58. Knijnenburg, B.P.,Willemsen, M.C.: The effect of preference elicitation methods on the user experience of a recommender system. In: 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3457-3462. Atlanta, GA (2010)
59. Knijnenburg, B.P., Willemsen, M.C., Kobsa, A.: A pragmatic procedure to support the user-centric evaluation of recommender systems. In: 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 321-324. Chicago, IL (2011a)
60. Knijnenburg, B.P., Meesters, L., Marrow, P., Bouwhuis, D.: User-centric evaluation framework for multimedia recommender systems. In: First International Conference on User Centric Media, LNICST, vol. 40, pp. 366-369. Venice, Spain (2010a)
61. Knijnenburg, B.P., Willemsen, M.C., Hirtbach, S.: Receiving recommendations and providing feedback: The user-experience of a recommender system. In: 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies, LNBIP, vol. 61, pp. 207-216. Bilbao, Spain (2010b)
62. Kobsa, A. Teltzrow, M.: Contextualized communication of privacy practices and personalization benefits: impacts on users' data sharing and purchase behavior. In: Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, LNCS, vol. 3424, pp. 329-343. Toronto, Canada (2005) (Pubitemid 41252013)
63. Komiak, S.Y.X., Benbasat, I.: The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. Mis Q. 30, 941-960 (2006) (Pubitemid 46051910)
64. Konstan J.A., Riedl J.: Recommender Systems: From Algorithms to User Experience. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22(1-2), 101-123 (2012)
65. Koren, Y., Bell, R., Volinsky, C.: Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Comput. 42, 30-37 (2009)
66. Koren, Y.: Factor in the neighbors: Scalable and accurate collaborative filtering. Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 4, 1-24 (2010)
67. Koufaris,M.: Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 205-223 (2003)
68. Kramer, T.: The effect of measurement task transparency on preference construction and evaluations of personalized recommendations. J. Market. Res. 44, 224-233 (2007)
69. Krishnan, V., Narayanashetty, P., Nathan, M., Davies, R., Konstan, J.: Who predicts better?: Results from an online study comparing humans and an online recommender system. In: 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 211-218. Lausanne, Switzerland (2008)
70. Law, E., Roto,V.,Hassenzahl, M.,Vermeeren, A.,Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 719-728. Boston, MA (2009)
71. Lynch, J.G. Jr., Ariely, D.: Wine online: search cost and competition on price, quality, and distribution. Market. Sci. 19, 83-103 (2000)
72. Marrow, P., Hanbidge, R., Rendle, S., Wartena, C., Freudenthaler, C.: MyMedia: producing an extensible framework for recommendation. In: Networked Electronic Media Summit 2009. Saint-Malo, France (2009)
73. McNamara, N., Kirakowski, J.: Functionality, usability, and user experience: three areas of concern. ACM Interact. 13, 26-28 (2006) (Pubitemid 44720191)
74. McNee, S., Albert, I., Cosley, D., Gopalkrishnan, P., Lam, S., Rashid, A., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: On the recommending of citations for research papers. In: 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 116-125. New Orleans, LA (2002)
75. McNee, S., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.: Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: 24th International Conference Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1097-1101. Montréal, Canada (2006a)
76. McNee, S., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.: Making recommendations better: an analytic model for human-recommender interaction. In: 24th International Conference Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1103-1108. Montréal, Canada (2006b)
77. Meesters, L.,Marrow, P., Knijnenburg, B.P., Bouwhuis, D., Glancy,M.: MyMedia Deliverable 1.5 End-user Recommendation Evaluation Metrics (2008) http://www.mymediaproject.org/Publications/WP1/MyMedia-D1.5.pdf
78. Murray, K., Häubl, G.: Interactive consumer decision aids. In: Wierenga, B. (ed.) Handbook of Marketing Decision Models, pp. 55-77. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
79. Murray, K., Häubl, G.: Personalization without interrogation: towards more effective interactions between consumers and feature-based recommendation agents. J. Interact. Market. 23, 138-146 (2009)
80. Muthen, B.: A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49, 115-132 (1984)
81. Nelson, P.: Information and consumer behavior. J. Polit. Econ. 78, 311-329 (1970)
82. Netemeyer, R., Bentler, P.: Structural equations modeling and statements regarding causality. J. Consum. Psychol. 10, 83-85 (2001)
83. Ochi, P., Rao, S., Takayama, L., Nass, C.: Predictors of user perceptions of web recommender systems: how the basis for generating experience and search product recommendations affects user responses. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68, 472-482 (2010)
84. Ozok, A.A., Fan, Q., Norcio, A.F.: Design guidelines for e?ective recommender system interfaces based on a usability criteria conceptual model: results from a college student population. Behav. Inf. Technol. 29, 57-83 (2010)
85. Paramythis, A.,Weibelzahl, S., Masthoff, J.: Layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: framework and formative methods. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 20, 383-453 (2010)
86. Pathak, B., Garfinkel, R., Gopal, R.D., Venkatesan, R., Yin, F.: Empirical analysis of the impact of recommender systems on sales. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27, 159-188 (2010)
87. Pedersen, P.: Behavioral effects of using software agents for product and merchant brokering: an experimental study of consumer decision-making. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 5, 125-141 (2000) (Pubitemid 33600136)
88. Pommeranz, A., Broekens, J.,Wiggers, P., Brinkman,W.-P., Jonker, C.M.: Designing interfaces for explicit preference elicitation: a user-centered investigation of preference representation and elicitation process. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9116-6
89. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2002)
90. Pu, P., Chen, L.: Trust building with explanation interfaces. In: 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 93-100. Sydney, Australia (2006) (Pubitemid 44074855)
91. Pu, P., Chen, L.: Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 20, 542-556 (2007) (Pubitemid 47068958)
92. Pu, P., Chen, L.: A user-centric evaluation framework of recommender systems. In: ACM RecSys 2010 Workshop on User-Centric Evaluation of Recommender Systems and Their Interfaces, pp. 14-21. Barcelona, Spain (2010)
93. Pu, P., Chen, L., Hu, R.: Evaluating recommender systems from the user's perspective: survey of the state of the art. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9115-7
94. Pu, P., Chen, L., Kumar, P.: Evaluating product search and recommender systems for E-commerce environments. Electron. Commer. Res. 8, 1-27 (2008)
95. Rendle, S., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Online-updating regularized kernel matrix factorization models for largescale recommender systems. In: 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender systems, pp. 251-258. Lausanne, Switzerland (2008)
96. Rendle, S., Freudenthaler, C., Gantner, Z., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In: Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 452-461. Montreal, Canada (2009)
97. Resnick, P., Varian, H.: Recommender systems. Commun. ACM 40, 56-58 (1997) (Pubitemid 127441130)
98. Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., Todd, P.: Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. Consum. Res. 37, 409-425 (2010)
99. Schwartz, B.: The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. HarperCollins, New York (2004)
100. Senecal, S., Nantel, J.: The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices. J. Retail. 80, 159-169 (2004) (Pubitemid 38845364)
101. Sheeran, P.: Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur. Rev. Soc Psychol. 12, 1-36 (2002)
102. Simonson, I., Tversky, A.: Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J. Market. Res. 29, 281-295 (1992)
103. Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., Berendt, B.: E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In: 3rd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 38-47. Tampa, FL (2001)
104. Stolze, M., Nart, F.: Well-integrated needs-oriented recommender components regarded as helpful. In: 22nd International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1571. Vienna, Austria (2004)
105. Tam, K.Y., Ho, S.Y.: Web personalization as a Persuasion strategy: an elaboration likelihood model perspective. Inf. Syst. Res. 16, 271-291 (2005) (Pubitemid 41395567)
106. Teltzrow, M., Kobsa, A.: Impacts of user privacy preferences on personalized systems. Hum.-Comput. Interact. Ser. 5, 315-332 (2004)
107. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explanations for Recommender Systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9117-5
108. Torres, R., McNee, S., Abel, M., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Enhancing digital libraries with TechLens+. In: 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 228-236. Tucson, AZ (2004)
109. Van Velsen, L., VanDer Geest, T., Klaassen, R., Steehouder, M.: User-centered evaluation of adaptive and adaptable systems: a literature review. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 23, 261-281 (2008)
110. Venkatesh,V.,Morris, M.,Davis, G., Davis, F.:User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Q. 27, 425-478 (2003)
111. Viappiani, P., Faltings, B., Pu, P.: Preference-based search using example-critiquing with suggestions. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 27, 465-503 (2006)
112. Viappiani, P., Pu, P., Faltings, B.: Preference-based search with adaptive recommendations. AI Commun. 21, 155-175 (2008)
113. Vijayasarathy, L.R., Jones, J.M.: Do internet shopping aids make a difference? an empirical investigation. Electron. Markets 11, 75-83 (2001)
114. Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23, 217-246 (2007)
115. Willemsen, M.C., Knijnenburg, B.P., Graus, M.P., Velter-Bremmers, L.C.M., Fu, K.: Using latent features diversification to reduce choice difficulty in recommendation lists. In: RecSys'11Workshop on Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems, CEUR-WS, vol. 811, pp. 14-20. Chicago, IL (2011)
116. Xiao, B., Benbasat, I.: ECommerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. Mis Q. 31, 137-209 (2007) (Pubitemid 46382521)
117. Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., Rho, J.: Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Inf. Manag. 42, 965-976 (2005) (Pubitemid 41162399)
118. Ziegler, C., McNee, S., Konstan, J., Lausen, G.: Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: 14th international World Wide Web Conference, pp. 22-32. Chiba, Japan (2005)
119. Zins, A., Bauernfeind, U.: Explaining online purchase planning experiences with recommenderwebsites. In: International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, pp. 137-148. Innsbruck, Austria (2005)