The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender

User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 455-496

  Cramer, Henriette ^a   Evers, Vanessa ^a   Ramlal, Satyan ^a   Van Someren, Maarten ^a   Rutledge, Lloyd ^b,c   Stash, Natalia ^d,e   Aroyo, Lora ^d,e   Wielinga, Bob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b TELEMATICA INSTITUUT   (Netherlands)

^c CWI   (Netherlands)

^d EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^e VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Cultural heritage; Human computer interaction; Recommender systems; Transparency; Trust; User adaptivity

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE; CULTURAL HERITAGE; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; TRUST; USER-ADAPTIVITY;

FLOW INTERACTIONS; HELIUM; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; TRANSPARENCY;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 54949121314     PISSN: 09241868     EISSN: 15731391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. S.R. Alpert J. Karat C. Karat C. Brodie J.G. Vergo 2003 User attitudes regarding a user-adaptive e-Commerce web site User. Model. User-adapt. Interact. 13 4 373 396
2. Amazon, http://www.amazon.com
3. Aroyo L., Wang Y., Brussee R., Gorgels P., Rutledge L. and Stash N. (2007). Personalised Museum Experience: The Rijksmuseum Use Case. The International Museums and the Web Conference, San Francisco, USA
4. C. Bartneck 2001 How convincing is Mr. Data's smile: affective expressions of machines User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 11 4 279 295
5. D. Benyon 1993 Adaptive systems: a solution to usability problems User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 3 1 65 87
6. Bilgic, M., Mooney, R.J.: Explaining Recommendations: Satisfaction vs. Promotion. Beyond Personalization Workshop, The International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 470-474. San Diego, California, USA (2005)
7. Bowen, J.P., Filippini-Fantoni, S.: Personalization and the Web from a Museum Perspective. The International Museums and the Web Conference, pp. 63-78 (2004)
8. Briggs, P., Simpson, B., De Angeli, A.: Trust and personalisation: a reciprocal relationship? In: Karat, C.-M., Blom, J., Karat, J. (eds.) Designing Personalised User Experiences for e-Commerce, pp. 39-55. Kluwer (2004)
9. P. Brusilovsky 1996 Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 6 2-3 87 129
10. R. Burke 2002 Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 12 4 331 370
11. Carmagnola, R., Cena, F., Comsole, L., Cortassa, O., Gena, C., Goy, A., Torre, I.: Tag-based User Models for Social Multi-Device Adaptive Guides. This issue (2008)
12. Carmichael, D., Kay, J., Kummerfeld, B., Niu, W.: Why did you show/tell/hide that? The need for scrutability in ubiquitous personalisation. ECHISE Workshop Exploiting Context Histories in Smart Environments at UbiComp, Irvine, CA, USA (2006)
13. C. Castelfranchi R. Falcone 2000 Trust and control: a dialectic link Appl. Artif. Intell. J. 14 8 799 823
14. K. Cheverst H.E. Byun D. Fitton C. Sas C. Kray N. Villar 2005 Exploring issues of user model transparency and proactive behaviour in an office environment control system User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 15 3-4 235 273
15. Cortellessa, G., Giuliani, M.V., Scopelliti, M., Cesta, A.: Key issues in interactive roblem solving: an empirical investigation on users attitude. Interact, pp. 657-670. Rome, Italy (2005)
16. Cramer, H.S.M., Evers, V., Van Someren, M., Wielinga, B., Besselink, S., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L.: User Interaction with User-Adaptive Information Filters, pp. 324-333. HCI International, Beijing, China (2007)
17. Cramer, H.S.M., Wielinga, B.J., Evers, V., Rutledge, L., Stash, N.: The Effects of Transparency on Perceived and Actual Competence of a Content-Based Recommender. Semantic Web User Interaction workshop at CHI, Florence, Italy (2008)
18. Damiano, R., Gena., C., Lombardo, V., Nunnari, F., Pizzo, A.: A stroll with carletto. Adaptation in Drama-Based Tours with Virtual Characters. This issue (2008)
19. F.D. Davis 1989 Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology MIS Quart. 13 2 318 340
20. M. Dzindolet S.A. Peterson R.A. Pomranky L.G. Pierce H.P. Beck 2003 The role of trust in automation reliance Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 58 6 697 718
21. Fog g, B.J.: Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI, PP. 722-723 (2003).
22. Fogg, B.J., Tseng, H.: The Elements of Computer Credibility. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI, pp. 80-87 (1999)
23. D. Gefen E. Karahanna D.W. Straub 2003 Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model MIS Quart. 27 1 51 90
24. D. Goren-Bar I. Graziola F. Pianesi M. Zancanaro 2006 The influence of personality factors on visitor attitudes towards adaptivity dimensions for mobile museum guides User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 16 1 31 62
25. S. Gregor I. Benbasat 1999 Explanations from intelligent systems: theoretical foundations and implications for ractice MIS Quart. 23 4 497 530
26. U. Hanani B. Shapira P. Shoval 2001 Information filtering: overview of issues, research and systems User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 11 3 203 259
27. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.T.: Explaining Collaborative Filtering Recommendations. Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW, pp. 241-250. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, (2000)
28. J.L. Herlocker J.A. Konstan L.G. Terveen J.T. Riedl 2004 Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 22 1 5 53
29. Höök, K.: Evaluating the Utility and Usability of an Adaptive Hypermedia System. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces IUI, pp. 179-186. ACM, Orlando, Florida, USA (1997)
30. K. Höök 2000 Steps to take before intelligent interfaces become real Interact. Comput. 12 4 409 426
31. K. Höök J. Karlgren A. Waern N. Dahlbck C.G. Jansson K. Karlgren B. Lemaire 1996 A glass box approach to adaptive hypermedia User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 6 2-3 157 184
32. E. Hyvönen E. Mäkelä M. Salminen A. Valo K. Viljanen S. Saarela M. Junnila S. Kettula 2005 MuseumFinland-Finnish Museums on the semantic web J. Web Semantics 3 2 224 241
33. Jameson A. (2003). Adaptive interfaces and agents. In: Jacko, J. and Sears, A. (eds) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, pp 305-330. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
34. Jameson, A., Schwarzkopf, E.: Pros and Cons of Controllability: An Empirical Study. Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems, pp. 193-202. Springer (2002)
35. J.Y. Jian A.M. Bisantz C.G. Drury 2000 Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems Int. J. Cogn Ergonom. 4 1 53 71
36. X. Jiang M.T. Khasawneh R. Master S.R. Bowling A.K. Gramopadhye B.J. Melloy L. Grimes 2004 Measurement of human trust in a hybrid inspection system based on signal detection theory measures Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 34 5 407 419
37. Jøsang, A., Lo Presti, S.: Analysing the relationship between risk and trust. International Conference on Trust Management, Oxford, UK (2004)
38. K.S. Kurasaki 2000 Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data Field Methods 12 3 179 194
39. Kay, J.: Scrutable adaptation: Because we can and must. Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems AH, pp. 11-19. Dublin, Ireland (2006)
40. Kim, S., Alani, H., Hall, W., Lewis, P., Millard, D.E., Shadbolt, N.G., Weal, M.J.: Artequakt: Generating Tailored Biographies with Automatically Annotated Fragments from the Web. Semantic Authoring, Annotation and Knowledge Markup Workshop at ECAI, pp. 1-6. Riva del Garda, Italy (2006)
41. I.M. Klopping E. McKinney 2004 Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce Inform. Technol. Learn. Perform. J. 22 1 35 48
42. Langheinrich, M.: Privacy by Design-Principles for Privacy-Aware Ubiquitous Systems. International Symposium on Ubiquitous Computing Ubicomp, pp. 273-291. Atlanta, GA (2001)
43. J.D. Lee N. Moray 1994 Trust, self-confidence, and operator's adaptation to automation Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 40 153 184
44. J.D. Lee K.A. See 2004 Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance Hum. Factors 42 1 50 80
45. Q. Ma L. Liu 2004 The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings J. Organ. End User Comput. 16 1 59 72
46. D.J. McAllister 1995 Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations Acad. Manage. J. 38 1 24 59
47. D.L. McGuinness P. Pinheiro da Silva 2004 Explaining answers from the semantic web: the inference web approach Web Semantics. Sci. Serv. Agent World Wide Web 1 4 397 413
48. McNee, S.M., Lam, S.K., Guetzlaff, C., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Confidence Metrics and Displays in Recommender Systems. Interact, pp. 176-183. Zurich, Switzerland (2003)
49. D. McSherry 2005 Explanation in recommender systems Artif. Intell. Rev. 24 179 197
50. B.M. Muir 1994 Trust in automation: part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems Ergonomics 37 1905 1922
51. B.M. Muir N. Moray 1996 Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation Ergonomics 39 3 429 460
52. N.O. Ndubisi O.K. Gupta G.C. Ndubisi 2005 The Moguls' model of computing: integrating the moderating impact of users' persona into the technology acceptance model J. Glob. Inform. Technol. Manage. 8 1 27 47
53. M. Nückles A. Winter J. Wittwer M. Herbert S. Hübner 2006 How do experts adapt their explanations to a layperson's knowledge in asynchronous communication? An experimental study User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 16 2 87 127
54. R. Oppermann M. Specht 1999 A nomadic information system for adaptive exhibition guidance Arch. Museum Inform. 13 2 127 138
55. Pandora, http://www.pandora.com
56. R. Parasuraman C. Miller 2004 Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems Commun. ACM 47 4 51 55
57. P.A. Pavlou 2003 Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model Int. J. Electron. Comm. 7 3 101 134
58. Proctor, N., Tellis, C.: The state of the art in museum handhelds in 2003. Museums and the Web. Charlotte, NC, USA (2003)
59. Picard R.W. (1997). Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
60. P. Pu L. Chen 2007 Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems Knowl.-based Syst. J. 20 542 556
61. B. Rajaonah F. Anceaux F. Vienne 2006 Trust and the use of adaptive cruise control: a study of a cut-in situation Cogn. Technol. Work 8 2 146 155
62. B. Rajaonah F. Anceaux F. Vienne 2006 Study of driver trust during cooperation with adaptive cruise control Le Travail Humain 69 99 127
63. B. Rajaonah N. Tricot F. Anceaux P. Millot 2008 Role of intervening variables in driver-ACC cooperation Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66 3 185 197
64. Reeves B. and Nass C. (1996). The media equation: how people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
65. Rocchi, C., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Kruppa, M., Krueger, A.: The Museum Visit: Generating Seamless Personalized Presentations on Multiple Devices. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 316-318. Madeira, Portugal (2004)
66. Schreiber, G., Amin, A., van Assem, M., de Boer, V., Hardman, L., Hildebrand, M., Hollink, L., Huang, Z., van Kersen, J., de Niet, M., Omelayenko, B., van Ossenbruggen, J., Siebes, R., Taekema, J., Wielemaker, J., Wielinga, B.J.: Multimedian e-culture demonstrator. International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 951-958. Athens, USA (2006)
67. H. Shimazu 2002 ExpertClerk: a conversational case-based reasoning tool for developing salesclerk agents in e-commerce webshops Artif. Intell. Rev. 18 223 244
68. B. Shneiderman P. Maes 2007 Direct manipulation vs. interface agents Interactions 4 6 42 61
69. Simmel, G.: In: Wolff, K.H. (ed.) The Sociology of George Simmel. Free Press, New York (1964)
70. Sinclair, P., Lewis, P., Martinez, K., Addis, M., Prideaux, D.: Semantic Web Integration of Cultural Heritage Sources. 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1047-1048. New York, USA (2006)
71. Sinha, R., Swearingen, K.: The role of transparency in recommender systems. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 830-831. ACM Press (2002)
72. O. Stock M. Zancanaro P. Busetta C. Callaway A. Krüger M. Kruppa T. Kuflik E. Not C. Rocchi 2007 Adaptive, intelligent presentation of information for the museum visitor in PEACH User-Model. User-adapt. Interact. 17 3 257 304
73. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Effective Explanations of Recommendations: User-Centered Design. ACM Conference on Recommender systems, pp. 153-156 (2007)
74. J. Trant 2006 Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums: proof of concept New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 12 1 83 105
75. H. van der Heijden 2004 User acceptance of hedonic information systems MIS Quart. 28 695 704
76. Van Setten, M.: Supporting People in finding information: hybrid recommender systems and goal-based structuring. Telematica Instituut, The Netherlands (2005)
77. V. Venkatesh M.G. Morris G.B. Davis F.D. Davis 2003 User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view MIS Quart. 27 3 425 478
78. Victor, P., Cornelis, C., De Cock, M., Pinheiro da Silva, P.: Gradual trust and distrust in recommender systems. To appear in Fuzzy Set. Syst. (2008)
79. A. Waern 2004 User involvement in automatic filtering: an experimental study User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 14 2-3 201 237
80. Wang Y. (2005). The Presentation of Media-rich Collections of Culture Heritage in the Age of Digital Reproduction. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
81. W. Wang I. Benbasat 2005 Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents J. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 6 3 72 101
82. W. Wang I. Benbasat 2007 Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 23 4 217 246
83. Wang, Y., Aroyo, L., Stash, N., Rutledge, L.: Interactive User Modeling for Personalised Access to Museum Collections: The Rijksmuseum Case Study. International User Modeling Conference UM, pp. 385-389. Corfu, Greece (2007)
84. I.L. Wu J.L. Chen 2005 An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 62 6 784 808
85. Wubs H. and Huysmans F. (2006). Snuffelen en Graven. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, The Netherlands
86. Xiao, S., Benbasat, I.: The formation of trust and distrust in recommendation agents in repeated interactions: a process-tracing analysis. The 5th international conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 287-293 (2003)
87. Zimmermann, A., Lorenz, A.: LISTEN: a User-Adaptive Audio-Augmented Museum Guide. This issue (2008)