The effect of preference elicitation methods on the user experience of a recommender system

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3457-3462

  Knijnenburg, Bart P ^a   Willemsen, Martijn C ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Preference elicitation; Recommender systems; Satisfaction; Understandability; Usefulness; User experience

Indexed keywords

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PREFERENCE ELICITATION; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; UNDERSTANDABILITY; USER EXPERIENCE;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 77953104870     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753846.1754001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Alba, J.W. and Hutchinson, J.W. Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research 13, 4 (1987), 411-454.
2. Chen, L. Survey of Preference Elicitation Methods. Unpublished (2004). http://hci.epfl.ch/members/lichen/IC-TECH-REPORT-200467.pdf.
3. Felix, D., Niederberger, C., Steiger, P., and Stolze, M. Feature- oriented vs. needs-oriented product access for non-expert online shoppers. In Towards the E-Society: E-Commerce, E- Business, and E-Government, Springer (2001), 399-406.
4. Guttman, R.H. and Maes, P. Agent-mediated integrative negotiation for retail electronic commerce. In Proc. AMET-98, Springer (1998), 70-90.
5. Haubl, G. and Trifts, V. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: the effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science 19, 1 (2000), 4-21.
6. Hoeffler, S. and Ariely, D. Constructing stable preferences: a look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. Journal of Consumer Psychology 8, 2 (2002), 113-139.
7. Knijnenburg, B.P. and Willemsen, M.C. Understanding the effect of adaptive preference elicitation methods on user satisfaction of a recommender system. Proc. RecSys 2009, ACM Press (2009), 381-384.
8. McNee, S., Riedl, J., and Konstan, J. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1097-1101.
9. Olson, E.L. and Widing II, R.E. Are interactive decision aids better than passive decision aids? Journal of Interactive Marketing 16, 2 (2002), 22-33.
10. Pu, P. and Chen, L. Integrating tradeoff support in product search tools for e-commerce sites. In Proc. EC'05, ACM Press (2005), 269-278. (Pubitemid 43048687)
11. Pu, P. and Kumar, P. Evaluating example-based search tools. In Proc. EC'04, ACM Press (2004), 208-217.
12. Spiekermann, S. Online Information Search with Electronic Agents: Drivers, Impediments, and Privacy Issues. Unpublished (2001). http://dissertationen.huberlin. de/dissertationen/spiekermann-sarah-2001-11-22/ PDF/Spiekermann.pdf.
13. Stolze, M. and Nart, F. Well-integrated needsoriented recommender components regarded as helpful. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1571-1571
14. Urban, G.L., Sultan, F., and Qualls, W. Design and evaluation of a trust based advisor on the internet. Unpublished (1999). http://ebiz.mit.edu/research/ papers/123Urban,TrustBasedAdvisor.pdf.
15. Viappiani, P., Faltings, B., and Pu, P. Preference-based search using example-critiquing with suggestions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 27, (2006), 465-503.
16. Viappiani, P, Pu, P., and Faltings, B. Conversational recommenders with adaptive suggestions. In Proc. RecSys 2007, ACM Press (2007), 89-96.
17. Xiao, B. and Benbasat, I. E-commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly 31, 1 (2007), 137-209. (Pubitemid 46382521)