Each to his own: How different users call for different interaction methods in recommender systems

RecSys'11 - Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 141-148

  Knijnenburg, Bart P ^a   Reijmer, Niels J M ^b   Willemsen, Martijn C ^b  

^a Ringgold Standard Institution Informatics   (United States)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

human computer interaction; preference elicitation methods; recommender systems; usability; user experience; user interfaces

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN EXPERTS; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; INTERACTION METHODS; ONLINE EXPERIMENT; PREFERENCE ELICITATION; SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS; UNDERSTANDABILITY; USABILITY; USER CHARACTERISTICS; USER EXPERIENCE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; USER INTERFACES;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 82555191363     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2043932.2043960     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Aksoy, L. 2006. Should Recommendation Agents Think Like People? Journal of Service Research. 8, 4, 297-315. DOI =http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1094670506286326
2. Al-Natour, S. et al. 2006. The role of design characteristics in shaping perceptions of similarity: The case of online shopping assistants. J. Assoc. for Inform. Syst. 7, 12, 821-861.
3. Alba, J.W. and Hutchinson, J.W. 1987. Dimensions of Consumer Expertise. Journal of Consumer Research. 13, 4, 411-422. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ 209080
4. Bettman, J.R. et al. 1998. Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of consumer research. 25, 3, 187-217. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ 209535
5. Chernev, A. 2003. When More Is Less and Less Is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research. 30, 2, 170-183. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/376808
6. Coupey, E. et al. 1998. Product Category Familiarity and Preference Construction. Journal of Consumer Research. 24, 4, 459-468. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209521
7. Fitzsimons, G.J. and Lehmann, D.R. 2004. Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses. Marketing Science. 23, 1, 82-94. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1030.0033
8. Fogg, B. 2003. Persuasive technology : using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
9. Jameson, A. 2003. Adaptive interfaces and agents. Human-computer interaction handbook. J. A. Jacko and A. Sears, eds. Laurence Earlbaum Ass., New York, NY. 305-330.
10. Jones, N. et al. 2009. How Users Perceive and Appraise Personalized Recommendations. User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. G.-J. Houben et al., eds. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. 461-466. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-642-02247-0-53
11. Kamis, A. and Davern, M.J. 2004. Personalizing to product category knowledge: exploring the mediating effect of shopping tools on decision confidence. Proc. of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 10 pp. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265476
12. Knijnenburg, B.P. and Willemsen, M.C. 2010. The effect of preference elicitation methods on the user experience of a recommender system. Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, 3457-3462. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753846.1754001
13. Knijnenburg, B.P. and Willemsen, M.C. 2009. Understanding the effect of adaptive preference elicitation methods on user satisfaction of a recommender system. Proc. of the third ACM conf. on Recommender systems. ACM, New York, NY, 381-384. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1639714.1639793
14. Knijnenburg, B.P. et al. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. Accepted to User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. http://t.co/cC5qPr9
15. Komiak, S.Y.X. and Benbasat, I. 2006. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. Mis Quarterly. 30, 4, 941-960. (Pubitemid 46051910)
16. Kramer, T. 2007. The Effect of Measurement Task Transparency on Preference Construction and Evaluations of Personalized Recommendations. J. of Marketing Research. 44, 2, 224-233. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.224
17. McNee, S.M. et al. 2002. On the recommending of citations for research papers. Proc. of the 2002 ACM conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, NY, 116-125. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/587078.587096
18. McNee, S.M. et al. 2003. Interfaces for Eliciting New User Preferences in Recommender Systems. User Modeling 2003. E P. Brusilovsky et al., eds. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. 178-187. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/3-540-44963-9-24
19. Pereira, R.E. 2000. Optimizing human-computer interaction for the electronic commerce environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 1, 1, 23-44.
20. Pu, P. et al. 2008. Evaluating product search and recommender systems for E-commerce environments. Electronic Commerce Research. 8, 1-2, 1-27. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10660-008-9015-z
21. Randall, T. et al. 2007. User Design of Customized Products. Marketing Science. 26, 2, 268-280. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0116
22. Reijmer, N.J.M. Willemsen, M.C. and Knijnenburg, B.P. The effect of user characteristics on the satisfaction of different interaction methods for recommender systems. Technical report. http://bit.ly/ofPenD
23. Schwartz, B. 2004. The paradox of choice why more is less. HarperCollins, New York, NY.
24. Schwartz, B. et al. 2002. Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83, 5, 1178-1197. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1178
25. Spiekermann, S. and Paraschiv, C. 2002. Motivating human-agent interaction: Transferring insights from behavioral marketing to interface design. Electronic Commerce Res. 2, 3, 255-285. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/ A:1016062632182
26. Vries, P. 2004. Trust in systems: effects of direct and indirect information. PhD thesis. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
27. Wang, W. and Benbasat, I. 2007. Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: Effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. J. of Manage. Inform. Syst. 23, 4, 217-246. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230410
28. Xiao, B. and Benbasat, I. 2007. E-commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact. Mis Quarterly. 31, 1, 137-209. (Pubitemid 46382521)