A comparative user study on rating vs. personality quiz based preference elicitation methods

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 367-371

  Hu, Rong ^a   Pu, Pearl ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Personality quiz; Preference elicitation; Rating based; Recommender systems; User study

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; PERSONALITY QUIZ; PREFERENCE ELICITATION; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; USER STUDY;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 72549084806     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1502650.1502702     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Adomavicius, G. Toward the Next Generation of Re-commender Systems: A Survey of The State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., 17, 6 (2005), 734-749.
2. Bilgic, M. and Mooney, R.J. Explaining Recommendations: Satisfaction vs. Promotion. Beyond Personalization Workshop, IUI, 2005.
3. Chen, L. and Pu, P. Hybrid Critiquing-based Recom-mender Systems. In Proc. of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI2007), 2007, 22-31.
4. Gretzel, U. and Fesenmaier, D.R. Persuasion in Re-commender Systems. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11, 2 (2006): 81-100.
5. Häubl, G. and Trifts, V. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science, 19, 1 (2000), 4-21.
6. Jone, N. and Pu, P. User Technology Adoption Issues in Recommender Systems. In Proc. of Networking and Electronic Commerce Research Conference (NAEC2007), 2007.
7. Kemp, A.E. The Music Temperament: Psychology and Personality of Music1ians. Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.
8. Kivetz, R. and Dimonson, I. Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determination of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (2002), 155-170.
9. Kruger J., Wirtz D., Van Boven L. and Altermatt T.W. The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 1 (2004), 91-98.
10. McNee, S.M., Lam, S.K., Konstan, J.A., Riedal, J. Interfaces for eliciting new user preferences in recom-mender systems. User Modeling, Johnstown, PA, USA, Springer Verlag (2003) 178-187.
11. Tam, K.Y. and Ho, S.Y. Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Research, 16, 3 (2005), 271-291.
12. Rentfrow, P.J. and Gosling, S.D. The do re mi's of everyday life: The Structure and Personality Correlates of Music Preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 6 (2003), 1236-1256.