Non-Genetic Modulation of Notch Activity by Artificial Delivery of Notch Intracellular Domain into Neural Stem Cells

Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 672-684

  Haupt, Simone ^a,b   Borghese, Lodovica ^b   Brüstle, Oliver ^b   Edenhofer, Frank ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Differentiation; Neural stem cell; Notch; Protein transduction; Self renewal

Indexed keywords

CELL PENETRATING PEPTIDE; CYCLIN D1; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR 1B; HYBRID PROTEIN; NOTCH1 PROTEIN, MOUSE; NOTCH1 RECEPTOR; TRANSACTIVATOR PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CHEMISTRY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOUSE; NEURAL STEM CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL-PENETRATING PEPTIDES; CLONING, MOLECULAR; CYCLIN D1; CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR P27; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; MICE; NEURAL STEM CELLS; NIH 3T3 CELLS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECEPTOR, NOTCH1; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TAT GENE PRODUCTS, HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84865533113     PISSN: 15508943     EISSN: 15586804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-011-9335-6     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D., & Lake, R. J. (1999). Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science, 284, 770-776.
2. Louvi, A., & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (2006). Notch signalling in vertebrate neural development. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 93-102.
3. Aster, J. C., Robertson, E. S., Hasserjian, R. P., Turner, J. R., Kieff, E., & Sklar, J. (1997). Oncogenic forms of NOTCH1 lacking either the primary binding site for RBP-Jkappa or nuclear localization sequences retain the ability to associate with RBP-Jkappa and activate transcription. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, 11336-11343.
4. Tamura, K., Taniguchi, Y., Minoguchi, S., et al. (1995). Physical interaction between a novel domain of the receptor Notch and the transcription factor RBP-J kappa/Su(H). Current Biology, 5, 1416-1423.
5. Jarriault, S., Brou, C., Logeat, F., Schroeter, E. H., Kopan, R., & Israel, A. (1995). Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature, 377, 355-358.
6. Tani, S., Kurooka, H., Aoki, T., Hashimoto, N., & Honjo, T. (2001). The N- and C-terminal regions of RBP-J interact with the ankyrin repeats of Notch1 RAMIC to activate transcription. Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 1373-1380.
7. Barrick, D., & Kopan, R. (2006). The Notch transcription activation complex makes its move. Cell, 124, 883-885.
8. Kurooka, H., Kuroda, K., & Honjo, T. (1998). Roles of the ankyrin repeats and C-terminal region of the mouse notch1 intracellular region. Nucleic Acids Research, 26, 5448-5455.
9. Kopan, R., Nye, J. S., & Weintraub, H. (1994). The intracellular domain of mouse Notch: a constitutively activated repressor of myogenesis directed at the basic helix-loop-helix region of MyoD. Development, 120, 2385-2396.
10. Yoon, K., & Gaiano, N. (2005). Notch signaling in the mammalian central nervous system: insights from mouse mutants. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 709-715.
11. Kageyama, R., Ohtsuka, T., Hatakeyama, J., & Ohsawa, R. (2005). Roles of bHLH genes in neural stem cell differentiation. Experimental Cell Research, 306, 343-348.
12. Mumm, J. S., & Kopan, R. (2000). Notch signaling: from the outside in. Developmental Biology, 228, 151-165.
13. Dreesen, O., & Brivanlou, A. H. (2007). Signaling pathways in cancer and embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Reviews, 3, 7-17.
14. Campos, L. S., Decker, L., Taylor, V., & Skarnes, W. (2006). Notch, epidermal growth factor receptor, and beta1-integrin pathways are coordinated in neural stem cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281, 5300-5309.
15. Surmacz, B., Noisa, P., Risner-Janiczek, J. R., et al. DLK1 promotes neurogenesis of human and mouse pluripotent stem cell-derived neural progenitors via modulating notch and BMP signalling. Stem Cell Reviews. doi: 10. 1007/s12015-011-9298-7.
16. Ables, J. L., Breunig, J. J., Eisch, A. J., & Rakic, P. Not (ch) just development: Notch signalling in the adult brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 269-283.
17. Hurlbut, G. D., Kankel, M. W., Lake, R. J., & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (2007). Crossing paths with Notch in the hyper-network. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 19, 166-175.
18. Sanalkumar, R., Dhanesh, S. B., & James, J. (2010). Non-canonical activation of Notch signaling/target genes in vertebrates. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 67, 2957-2968.
19. Das, D., Lanner, F., Main, H., et al. (2010). Notch induces cyclin-D1-dependent proliferation during a specific temporal window of neural differentiation in ES cells. Developmental Biology, 348, 153-166.
20. Borghese, L., Dolezalova, D., Opitz, T., et al. (2010). Inhibition of notch signaling in human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells delays G1/S phase transition and accelerates neuronal differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cells, 28, 955-964.
21. Androutsellis-Theotokis, A., Leker, R. R., Soldner, F., et al. (2006). Notch signalling regulates stem cell numbers in vitro and in vivo. Nature, 442, 823-826.
22. Shimizu, K., Chiba, S., Saito, T., et al. (2002). Integrity of intracellular domain of Notch ligand is indispensable for cleavage required for release of the Notch2 intracellular domain. EMBO Journal, 21, 294-302.
23. Hicks, C., Ladi, E., Lindsell, C., et al. (2002). A secreted Delta1-Fc fusion protein functions both as an activator and inhibitor of Notch1 signaling. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 68, 655-667.
24. Schmidt, M. H., Bicker, F., Nikolic, I., et al. (2009). Epidermal growth factor-like domain 7 (EGFL7) modulates Notch signalling and affects neural stem cell renewal. Nature Cell Biology, 11, 873-880.
25. Deregowski, V., Gazzerro, E., Priest, L., Rydziel, S., & Canalis, E. (2006). Notch 1 overexpression inhibits osteoblastogenesis by suppressing Wnt/beta-catenin but not bone morphogenetic protein signaling. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281, 6203-6210.
26. Munst, B., Patsch, C., & Edenhofer, F. (2009). Engineering cell-permeable protein. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 28(34). doi: 10. 3791/1627.
27. Derossi, D., Chassaing, G., & Prochiantz, A. (1998). Trojan peptides: the penetratin system for intracellular delivery. Trends in Cell Biology, 8, 84-87.
28. Schwarze, S. R., & Dowdy, S. F. (2000). In vivo protein transduction: intracellular delivery of biologically active proteins, compounds and DNA. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 21, 45-48.
29. Edenhofer, F. (2008). Protein transduction revisited: novel insights into the mechanism underlying intracellular delivery of proteins. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 14, 3628-3636.
30. Vives, E., Brodin, P., & Lebleu, B. (1997). A truncated HIV-1 Tat protein basic domain rapidly translocates through the plasma membrane and accumulates in the cell nucleus. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, 16010-16017.
31. Schwarze, S. R., Ho, A., Vocero-Akbani, A., & Dowdy, S. F. (1999). In vivo protein transduction: delivery of a biologically active protein into the mouse. Science, 285, 1569-1572.
32. Nagahara, H., Vocero-Akbani, A. M., Snyder, E. L., et al. (1998). Transduction of full-length TAT fusion proteins into mammalian cells: TAT-p27Kip1 induces cell migration. Nature Medicine, 4, 1449-1452.
33. Nolden, L., Edenhofer, F., Haupt, S., et al. (2006). Site-specific recombination in human embryonic stem cells induced by cell-permeant Cre recombinase. Nature Methods, 3, 461-467.
34. Gump, J. M., June, R. K., & Dowdy, S. F. (2010). Revised role of glycosaminoglycans in TAT protein transduction domain-mediated cellular transduction. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285, 1500-1507.
35. Derossi, D., Joliot, A. H., Chassaing, G., & Prochiantz, A. (1994). The third helix of the Antennapedia homeodomain translocates through biological membranes. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269, 10444-10450.
36. Patsch, C., Peitz, M., Otte, D. M., et al. (2010). Engineering cell-permeant FLP recombinase for tightly controlled inducible and reversible overexpression in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells, 28, 894-902.
37. Thier, M., Munst, B., & Edenhofer, F. (2010). Exploring refined conditions for reprogramming cells by recombinant Oct4 protein. International Journal of Development Biology, 54, 1713-1721.
38. Seifinejad, A., Tabebordbar, M., Baharvand, H., Boyer, L. A., & Salekdeh, G. H. (2010). Progress and promise towards safe induced pluripotent stem cells for therapy. Stem Cell Reviews, 6, 297-306.
39. Said Hassane, F., Saleh, A. F., Abes, R., Gait, M. J., & Lebleu, B. (2010). Cell penetrating peptides: overview and applications to the delivery of oligonucleotides. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 67, 715-726.
40. Tunnemann, G., Martin, R. M., Haupt, S., Patsch, C., Edenhofer, F., & Cardoso, M. C. (2006). Cargo-dependent mode of uptake and bioavailability of TAT-containing proteins and peptides in living cells. The FASEB Journal, 20, 1775-1784.
41. Haupt, S., Edenhofer, F., Peitz, M., Leinhaas, A., & Brustle, O. (2007). Stage-specific conditional mutagenesis in mouse embryonic stem cell-derived neural cells and postmitotic neurons by direct delivery of biologically active Cre recombinase. Stem Cells, 25, 181-188.
42. Bosnali, M., & Edenhofer, F. (2008). Generation of transducible versions of transcription factors Oct4 and Sox2. Biological Chemistry, 389, 851-861.
43. Brustle, O., Jones, K. N., Learish, R. D., et al. (1999). Embryonic stem cell-derived glial precursors: a source of myelinating transplants. Science, 285, 754-756.
44. Novak, A., Guo, C., Yang, W., Nagy, A., & Lobe, C. G. (2000). Z/EG, a double reporter mouse line that expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein upon Cre-mediated excision. Genesis, 28, 147-155.
45. Okabe, S., Forsberg-Nilsson, K., Spiro, A. C., Segal, M., & McKay, R. D. (1996). Development of neuronal precursor cells and functional postmitotic neurons from embryonic stem cells in vitro. Mechanisms of Development, 59, 89-102.
46. Conti, L., Pollard, S. M., Gorba, T., et al. (2005). Niche-independent symmetrical self-renewal of a mammalian tissue stem cell. PLoS Biology, 3, e283.
47. Koch, P., Opitz, T., Steinbeck, J. A., Ladewig, J., & Brustle, O. (2009). A rosette-type, self-renewing human ES cell-derived neural stem cell with potential for in vitro instruction and synaptic integration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 3225-3230.
48. Jeffries, S., & Capobianco, A. J. (2000). Neoplastic transformation by Notch requires nuclear localization. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 20, 3928-3941.
49. Sarmento, L. M., Huang, H., Limon, A., et al. (2005). Notch1 modulates timing of G1-S progression by inducing SKP2 transcription and p27 Kip1 degradation. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 202, 157-168.
50. Hitoshi, S., Alexson, T., Tropepe, V., et al. (2002). Notch pathway molecules are essential for the maintenance, but not the generation, of mammalian neural stem cells. Genes & Development, 16, 846-858.
51. Nagao, M., Sugimori, M., & Nakafuku, M. (2007). Cross talk between notch and growth factor/cytokine signaling pathways in neural stem cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 27, 3982-3994.
52. Hitoshi, S., Seaberg, R. M., Koscik, C., et al. (2004). Primitive neural stem cells from the mammalian epiblast differentiate to definitive neural stem cells under the control of Notch signaling. Genes & Development, 18, 1806-1811.
53. Kopan, R., & Ilagan, M. X. (2009). The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell, 137, 216-233.
54. Guentchev, M., & McKay, R. D. (2006). Notch controls proliferation and differentiation of stem cells in a dose-dependent manner. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2289-2296.
55. Dohda, T., Maljukova, A., Liu, L., et al. (2007). Notch signaling induces SKP2 expression and promotes reduction of p27Kip1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines. Experimental Cell Research, 313, 3141-3152.
56. Murata, K., Hattori, M., Hirai, N., et al. (2005). Hes1 directly controls cell proliferation through the transcriptional repression of p27Kip1. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 25, 4262-4271.
57. Campa, V. M., Gutierrez-Lanza, R., Cerignoli, F., et al. (2008). Notch activates cell cycle reentry and progression in quiescent cardiomyocytes. The Journal of Cell Biology, 183, 129-141.
58. Ronchini, C., & Capobianco, A. J. (2001). Induction of cyclin D1 transcription and CDK2 activity by Notch(ic): implication for cell cycle disruption in transformation by Notch(ic). Molecular and Cellular Biology, 21, 5925-5934.
59. Oishi, K., Kamakura, S., Isazawa, Y., et al. (2004). Notch promotes survival of neural precursor cells via mechanisms distinct from those regulating neurogenesis. Developmental Biology, 276, 172-184.
60. Nguyen, L., Besson, A., Heng, J. I., et al. (2006). p27kip1 independently promotes neuronal differentiation and migration in the cerebral cortex. Genes & Development, 20, 1511-1524.
61. Carruthers, S., Mason, J., & Papalopulu, N. (2003). Depletion of the cell-cycle inhibitor p27(Xic1) impairs neuronal differentiation and increases the number of ElrC(+) progenitor cells in Xenopus tropicalis. Mechanisms of Development, 120, 607-616.
62. Vernon, A. E., Movassagh, M., Horan, I., Wise, H., Ohnuma, S., & Philpott, A. (2006). Notch targets the Cdk inhibitor Xic1 to regulate differentiation but not the cell cycle in neurons. EMBO Reports, 7, 643-648.
63. Aguirre, A., Rubio, M. E., & Gallo, V. (2010). Notch and EGFR pathway interaction regulates neural stem cell number and self-renewal. Nature, 467, 323-327.
64. Faux, C. H., Turnley, A. M., Epa, R., Cappai, R., & Bartlett, P. F. (2001). Interactions between fibroblast growth factors and Notch regulate neuronal differentiation. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 5587-5596.
65. Stock, K., Nolden, L., Edenhofer, F., Quandel, T., & Brustle, O. (2010). Transcription factor-based modulation of neural stem cell differentiation using direct protein transduction. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 67, 2439-2449.
66. Zhang, Y. E., Wang, J. N., Tang, J. M., et al. (2009). In vivo protein transduction: delivery of PEP-1-SOD1 fusion protein into myocardium efficiently protects against ischemic insult. Molecules and Cells, 27, 159-166.