Three Alternatives to measure the human-likeness of a handshake model in a Turing-like test

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 156-182

  Nisky, Ilana ^a   Avraham, Guy ^a   Karniel, Amir ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ROBOTICS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

COMPUTER MODELS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; HUMAN LIKENESS; LINEAR COMBINATIONS; LOW LEVEL; MACHINE INTELLIGENCE; NOISE TEST; SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY; SIMULATION STUDIES; STATISTICAL POWER; TELEPRESENCE; TELEROBOTIC SYSTEMS; TURING TESTS;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 84864947391     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/PRES_a_00097     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Abdi, H. (2007a). The Bonferroni and Sidak corrections for multiple comparisons. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Abdi, H. (2007b). Signal detection theory. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Sizecontrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5(6), 679-685.
4. Anttonen, J., & Surakka, V. (2005). Emotions and heart rate while sitting on a chair. Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon.
5. Avraham, G., Levy-Tzedek, S., & Karniel, A. (2009). Exploring the rhythmic nature of handshake movement and a Turinglike test. Paper presented at the Fifth Computational Motor Control Workshop, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
6. Avraham, G., Levy-Tzedek, S., Peles, B.-C., Bar-Haim, S., & Karniel, A. (2010). Reduced frequency variability in handshake movements of individuals with cerebral palsy. Paper presented at the Sixth Computational Motor Control Workshop, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
7. Avraham, G., Nisky, I., Fernandes, H., Acuna, D., Kording, K., Loeb, G., & Karniel, A. (submitted). Towards perceiving robots as humans-Three handshake models face the Turing-like handshake test. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. doi:10.1109/TOH.2012.16.
8. Avraham, G., Nisky, I., & Karniel, A. (2011). When robots become humans: A Turing-like handshake test. Paper presented at the CMCW7, Seventh Annual Computational Motor Control Workshop at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
9. Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2008). Virtual interpersonal touch: Haptic interaction and copresence in collaborative virtual environments. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 37(1), 5-14. doi:10.1007/s11042-007-0171-2
10. Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2007). Virtual interpersonal touch and digital chameleons. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31(4), 225-242.
11. Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Brave, S., Merget, D., & Koslow, D. (2007). Virtual interpersonal touch: Expressing and recognizing emotions through haptic devices. Human-Computer Interaction, 22(3), 325-353.
12. Barto, A. G., Fagg, A. H., Sitkoff, N., & Houk, J. C. (1999). A cerebellar model of timing and prediction in the control of reaching. Neural Computation, 11(3), 565-594. doi:10.1162/089976699300016575
13. Ben-Itzhak, S., & Karniel, A. (2007). Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements. Neural Computation, 20(3), 779-812. doi:10.1162/neco.2007.12-05-077
14. Biggs, J., & Srinivasan, M. A. (2002). Haptic interfaces. In K. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments (pp. 93-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Chaplin, W. F., Phillips, J. B., Brown, J. D., Clanton, N. R., & Stein, J. L. (2000). Handshaking, gender, personality, and first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 110-117.
16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
18. Durlach, N., & Slater, M. (2000). Presence in shared virtual environments and virtual togetherness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 214-217. doi:10.1162/105474600566736
19. El Saddik, A. (2007). The potential of haptics technologies. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 10(1), 10-17.
20. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870), 429-433.
21. Feth, D., Groten, R., Peer, A., & Buss, M. (2011). Haptic human-robot collaboration: Comparison of robot partner implementations in terms of human-likeness and task performance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20(2), 173-189. doi:10.1162/pres_a_00042
22. Flanagan, J. R., & Wing, A. M. (1997). The role of internal models in motion planning and control: Evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(4), 1519-1528.
23. Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience, 5(7), 1688-1703.
24. Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Meddis, R., Pearson, D. E., & IJsselsteijn, W. (2000). Using behavioral realism to estimate presence: A study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 149-164. doi:10.1162/105474600566691
25. Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675-701.
26. Friedman, R., Hester, K., Green, B., & LaMotte, R. (2008). Magnitude estimation of softness. Experimental Brain Research, 191(2), 133-142.
27. Ganel, T., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature, 426(6967), 664-667.
28. Garcia-Perez, M. A., & Alcala-Quintana, R. (2011). Improving the estimation of psychometric functions in 2AFC discrimination tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(96), 1-9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00096
29. Gentry, S., Feron, E., & Murray-Smith, R. (2005). Humanhuman haptic collaboration in cyclical Fitts' tasks. Paper presented at the IROS 2005, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
30. Gescheider, G. A. (1985). Method, theory, and application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20-25.
32. Groten, R., Feth, D., Goshy, H., Peer, A., Kenny, D. A., & Buss, M. (2009). Experimental analysis of dominance in haptic collaboration. Paper presented at the RO-MAN 2009, the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.
33. Hannaford, B. (1989). Stability and performance tradeoffs in bi-lateral telemanipulation. Paper presented at the ICRA '89, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ.
34. Helbig, H., & Ernst, M. (2007). Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch. Experimental Brain Research, 179(4), 595-606. doi:10.1007/s00221-0060814-y
35. Hespanha, J. P., McLaughlin, M., Sukhatme, G. S., Akbarian, M., Garg, R., & Zhu, W. (2000). Haptic collaboration over the internet. Paper presented at the Fifth PHANToM Users Group Workshop.
36. Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 151-181. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1901\&2_7
37. Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., & Banks, M. S. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and causes visual fatigue. Journal of Vision, 8(3). doi:10.1167/8.3.33
38. Ikeura, R., Inooka, H., & Mizutani, K. (1999). Subjective evaluation for maneuverability of a robot cooperating with human. Paper presented at the RO-MAN 1999, 8th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interaction.
39. Jin, S.-A. A. (2011). "It feels right. Therefore, I feel present and enjoy": The effects of regulatory fit and the mediating roles of social presence and self-presence in avatar-based 3D virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20(2), 105-116.
40. Jindai, M., Watanabe, T., Shibata, S., & Yamamoto, T. (2006). Development of handshake robot system for embodied interaction with humans. Paper presented at the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Hatfield, UK.
41. Jones, L. A., & Hunter, I. W. (1990). A perceptual analysis of stiffness. Experimental Brain Research, 79(1), 150-156.
42. Jones, L. A., & Hunter, I. W. (1993). A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Experimental Brain Research, 94(2), 343-351.
43. Karniel, A. (2010). A Turing-like handshake test for motor intelligence. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neural Control of Movement, Naples, Florida.
44. Karniel, A., Avraham, G., Peles, B.-C., Levy-Tzedek, S., & Nisky, I. (2010). One dimensional Turing-like handshake test for motor intelligence. Journal of Vision Exploration, 46, e2492.
45. Karniel, A., & Inbar, G. F. (1997). A model for learning human reaching movements. Biological Cybernetics, 77(3), 173-183. doi:10.1007/s004220050378
46. Karniel, A., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2003). Sequence, time, or state representation: How does the motor control system adapt to variable environments? Biological Cybernetics, 89(1), 10-21.
47. Karniel, A., Nisky, I., Avraham, G., Peles, B.-C., & LevyTzedek, S. (2010). A Turing-like handshake test for motor intelligence. In A. Kappers, J. van Erp, W. Bergmann Tiest, & F. van der Helm (Eds.), Haptics: Generating and perceiving tangible sensations (Vol. 6191, pp. 197-204). Berlin: Springer.
48. Kasuga, T., & Hashimoto, M. (2005). Human-robot handshaking using neural oscillators. Paper presented at the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain.
49. Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9(6), 718-727. doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8
50. Kim, J., Kim, H., Tay, B. K., Muniyandi, M., Srinivasan, M. A., Jordan, J., ... Slater, M. (2004). Transatlantic touch: A study of haptic collaboration over long distance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(3), 328-337. doi:10.1162/1054746041422370
51. Kunii, Y., & Hashimoto, H. (1995). Tele-handshake using HandShake device. Paper presented at the 1995 IEEE IECON, 21st International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation.
52. Laine, C. M., Spitler, K. M., Mosher, C. P., & Gothard, K. M. (2009). Behavioral triggers of skin conductance responses and their neural correlates in the primate amygdala. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(4), 1749-1754. doi:10.1152/jn.91110.2008
53. Lu, Z.-L., & Dosher, B. A. (2008). Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: Assessing internal representations with external noise. Psychological Review, 115(1), 44-82. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.1.44
54. MacMillan, N. A. (2002). Signal detection theory. Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology. New York: John Wiley.
55. McLaughlin, M., Sukhatme, G., Wei, P., Weirong, Z., & Parks, J. (2003). Performance and co-presence in heterogeneous haptic collaboration. Paper presented at the HAPTICS 2003, 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems.
56. Meteyard, L., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2007). Motion detection and motion verbs. Psychological Science, 18(11), 1007-1013. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02016.x
57. Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2001). On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Kärber method. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1399-1420. doi:10.3758/bf03194551
58. Miyashita, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Human-like natural behavior generation based on involuntary motions for humanoid robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 48(4), 203-212.
59. Morasso, P. (1981). Spatial control of arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 42(2), 223-227.
60. Nieder, A., & Miller, E. K. (2004). Analog numerical representations in Rhesus monkeys: Evidence for parallel processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(5), 889-901. doi:10.1162/089892904970807
61. Niemeyer, G., & Slotine, J.-J. E. (2004). Telemanipulation with time delays. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 23(9), 873-890. doi:10.1177/0278364904045563
62. Nisky, I., Baraduc, P., & Karniel, A. (2010). Proximodistal gradient in the perception of delayed stiffness. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103(6), 3017-3026.
63. Nisky, I., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Karniel, A. (2008). A regression and boundary-crossing-based model for the perception of delayed stiffness. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 1(2), 73-82.
64. Nisky, I., Pressman, A., Pugh, C. M., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Karniel, A. (2011). Perception and action in teleoperated needle insertion. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 4(3), 155-166.
65. Norwich, K. (1987). On the theory of Weber fractions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 42(3), 286-298. doi:10.3758/bf03203081
66. Okamura, A., Verner, L., Reiley, C., & Mahvash, M. (2011). Haptics for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. In M. Kaneko & Y. Nakamura (Eds.), Robotics research (Vol. 66, pp. 361-372). Berlin: Springer.
67. Ouchi, K., & Hashimoto, S. (1997). Handshake telephone system to communicate with voice and force. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.
68. Pollak, S. D., Messner, M., Kistler, D. J., & Cohn, J. F. (2009). Development of perceptual expertise in emotion recognition. Cognition, 110(2), 242-247. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.010
69. Pressman, A., Nisky, I., Karniel, A., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2008). Probing virtual boundaries and the perception of delayed stiffness. Advanced Robotics, 22, 119-140.
70. Pressman, A., Welty, L. J., Karniel, A., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2007). Perception of delayed stiffness. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 26(11-12), 1191-1203.
71. Rahman, M. M., Ikeura, R., & Mizutani, K. (2002). Investigation of the impedance characteristic of human arm for development of robots to cooperate with humans. International Journal Series C Mechanical Systems, Machine Elements and Manufacturing, 45(2), 510-518.
72. Reed, K. B., & Peshkin, M. A. (2008). Physical collaboration of human-human and human-robot teams. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 1(2), 108-120.
73. Roennqvist, L., & Roesblad, B. (2007). Kinematic analysis of unimanual reaching and grasping movements in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Clinical Biomechanics, 22(2), 165-175.
74. Sato, T., Hashimoto, M., & Tsukahara, M. (2007). Synchronization based control using online design of dynamics and its application to human-robot interaction. Paper presented at the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetrics.
75. Schloerb, D. W. (1995). A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(1), 64-80.
76. Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1994). Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience, 14(5), 3208-3224.
77. Shadmehr, R., & Wise, S. P. (2005). The computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing: A foundation for motor learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78. Sheridan, T. B. (1994). Further musings on the psychophysics of presence. Paper presented at the Humans, Information and Technology, 1994 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
79. Sheridan, T. B. (1996). Further musings on the psychophysics of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(2), 241-246.
80. Srinivasan, M. A., & LaMotte, R. H. (1995). Tactual discrimination of softness. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73(1), 88-101.
81. Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64(3), 153-181. doi:10.1037/h0046162
82. Stewart, G. L., Dustin, S. L., Barrick, M. R., & Darnold, T. C. (2008). Exploring the handshake in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1139-1146. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1139
83. Tan, H. Z., Durlach, N. I., Beauregard, G., & Srinivasan, M. A. (1995). Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: The roles of force and work cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(4), 495-510.
84. Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neuroscience, 5(11), 1226-1235. doi:10.1038/nn963
85. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, LIX(236).
86. Uchida, N., & Mainen, Z. F. (2003). Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat. Nature Neuroscience, 6(11), 1224-1229. doi:10.1038/nn1142
87. van Den, B. (2000). Coordination disorders in patients with Parkinson's disease: A study of paced rhythmic forearm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 134(2), 174-186.
88. van der Heide, J. C., Fock, J. M., Otten, B., Stremmelaar, E., Hadders-Algra, M. (2005). Kinematic characteristics of reaching movements in preterm children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Research, 57(6), 883.
89. Wang, Z., Lu, J., Peer, A., & Buss, M. (2010). Influence of vision and haptics on plausibility of social interaction in virtual reality scenarios. In A. Kappers, J. van Erp, W. Bergmann Tiest, & F. van der Helm (Eds.), Haptics: Generating and perceiving tangible sensations (Vol. 6192, pp. 172-177). Berlin: Springer.
90. Wang, Z., Peer, A., & Buss, M. (2009). An HMM approach to realistic haptic human-robot interaction. Paper presented at the World Haptics 2009, Third Joint EuroHaptics Conference, and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.
91. Warren, J. D., Uppenkamp, S., Patterson, R. D., & Griffiths, T. D. (2003). Separating pitch chroma and pitch height in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(17), 10038-10042. doi:10.1073/pnas.1730682100
92. Wichmann, F., & Hill, N. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1293-1313.
93. Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212-1217.
94. Yokokohji, Y., & Yoshikawa, T. (1994). Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling-Formulation and experiment. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 10(5), 605-620.
95. Zaal, F. T. J. M., & Bootsma, R. J. (2011). Virtual reality as a tool for the study of perception-action: The case of running to catch fly balls. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20(1), 93-103.