Haptic human-robot collaboration: Comparison of robot partner implementations in terms of human-likeness and task performance

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 173-189

  Feth, Daniela ^a   Groten, Raphaela ^a   Peer, Angelika ^a   Buss, Martin ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATION PARTNER; CONTINUOUS SCALE; ENERGY EXCHANGES; FEEDBACK MODEL; FEEDFORWARD MODEL; HAPTIC INTERACTIONS; HUMAN-ROBOT COLLABORATION; IN-BUILDINGS; MANIPULATION TASK; MUTUAL ADAPTATION; ROBOT IMPLEMENTATION; SCALE VALUE; SUBJECTIVE RATING; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING SPACE;

ELASTIC DEFORMATION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 79958260652     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres_a_00042     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allison, R. S., Zacher, J. E., Wang, D., & Shu, J. (2004). Effects of network delay on a collaborative motor task with telehaptic and televisual feedback. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, 375-381.
2. Basdogan, C., Ho, C.-H., & Srinivasan, M. A. (2000). An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 443-460.
3. Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39(3/4), 324-345.
4. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
5. Corteville, B., Aertbelien, E., Bruyninckx, H., Schutter, J. D., & Brussel, H. V. (2007). Human-inspired robot assistant for fast point-to-point movements. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3639-3644.
6. Duchaine, V., & Gosselin, C. (2007). General model of human-robot cooperation using a novel velocity based variable impedance control. In Proceedings of the 2nd Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 446-451.
7. Duchaine, V., & Gosselin, C. (2009). Safe, stable and intuitive control for physical human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3383-3388.
8. Duffy, B. R., Joue, G., & Bourke, J. (2002). Issues in assessing performance of social robots. In Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS International Conference on Robotics, Distance Learning and Intelligent Communication Systems, 25-28.
9. Edlund, J., Gustafson, J., Heldner, M., & Hjalmarsson, A. (2008). Towards human-like spoken dialogue systems. Speech Communication, 50(8-9), 630-645.
10. Evrard, P., & Kheddar, A. (2009). Homotopy switching model for dyad haptic interaction in physical collaborative tasks. In Proceedings of the Third Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 45-50.
11. Feil-Seifer, D., Skinner, K., & Mataric, M. J. (2007). Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics. Interaction Studies, 8(17), 423-439.
12. Feth, D., Groten, R., Peer, A., & Buss, M. (2009). Controltheoretic model of haptic human-human interaction in a pursuit tracking task. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 1106-1111.
13. Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience, 5(7), 1688-1703.
15. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 143-166.
16. Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Meddis, R., Pearson, D. E., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2000). Using behavioral realism to estimate presence: A study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Enviroments, 9(2), 149-164.
17. Gentry, S., Wall, S., Oakley, I., & Murray-Smith, R. (2003). Got rhythm? Haptic-only lead and follow dancing. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics, 481-488.
18. Gescheider, G. A. (1985). Psychophysics: Method, Theory, and Application. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 151-181.
20. IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Ridder, H., Freeman, J., & Avons, S. E. (2000). Presence: Concept, determinants, and measurement. In B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3959, pp. 520-529.
21. Ikeura, R., Inooka, H., & Mizutani, K. (2002). Subjective evaluation for maneuverability of a robot cooperating with humans. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 14(5), 514-519.
22. Ishiguro, H. (2007). Scientific issues concerning androids. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 26(1), 105-117.
23. Jagacinski, R. J., & Flach, J. M. (2003). Control theory for humans-Quantitative approaches to modeling performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Karniel, A., Nisky, I., Avraham, G., Peles, B.-C., & Levy-Tzedek, S. (2010). Haptics: Generating and perceiving tangible sensations. In A. M. Kappers, J. B. van Erp, W. M. B. Tiest, & F. C. van der Helm (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference, EuroHaptics 2010, Vol. 6192, pp. 197-204. Berlin: Springer.
25. Kazerooni, H., & Guo, J. (1993). Human extenders. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 115(2B), 281-290.
26. Khademian, B., & Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. (2007). Performance issues in collaborative haptic training. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3257-3262.
27. Krendel, E. S., & McRuer, D. T. (1960). A servomechanisms approach to skill development. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 268(1), 24-42.
28. McRuer, D. T., & Jex, H. R. (1967). A review of quasi-linear pilot models. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-8(3), 231-249.
29. McRuer, D. T., Allen, R. W., Weir, D. H., & Klein, R. H. (1977). New results in driver steering control models. Human Factors, 19(4), 381-397.
30. Minato, T., Shimada, M., Ishiguro, H., & Itakura, S. (2004). Innovations in applied artificial intelligence. LNCS, Vol. 3029, 424-434. Berlin: Springer.
31. Mori, M. (1970). Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
32. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33. Passenberg, C., Peer, A., & Buss, M. (2010). A survey of environment-, operator-, and task-adapted controllers for teleoperation systems. Journal of Mechatronics, 20(7), 787-801.
34. Rahman, M. M., Ikeura, R., & Mitzutani, K. (2002). Investigation of the impedance characteristic of human arm for development of robots to cooperate with humans. JSME International Journal Series C, 45(2), 510-518.
35. Reed, K. B., & Peshkin, M. A. (2008). Physical collaboration of human-human and human-robot teams. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 1(2), 108-120.
36. Russel, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2005). Artificial intelligence-A modern approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37. Sallnäs, E.-L. (1999). Presence in multimodal interfaces. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Presence.
38. Schloerb, D. W. (1995). A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(1), 64-80.
39. Schroeder, R., Steed, A., Axelsson, A.-S., Heldal, I., Abelin, A., Wideström, J., Nilsson, A., et al. (2001). Collaborating in networked immersive spaces: As good as being there together? Computers & Graphics, 25(5), 781-788.
40. Sharpand, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
41. Sheridan, T. B. (1996). Further musings on the psychophysics of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(2), 241-246.
42. Shibata, S., & Inooka, H. (1998). Psychological evaluations of robot motions-An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 21(12), 483-494.
43. Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 364(1535), 3549-3557.
44. Snow, M. P., & Williges, R. C. (1998). Empirical models based on free-modulus magnitude estimation of perceived presence in virtual environments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40(17), 386-402.
45. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677-680.
46. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(107), 4.
47. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433-460.
48. Wang, Z., Lu, J., Peer, A., & Buss, M. (2010). Haptics: Generating and perceiving tangible sensations. In A. Kappers, J. van Erp, W. M. B. Tiest, & F. C. van der Helm (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference, EuroHaptics 2010, 172-177.
49. Welch, R. B. (1997). The presence of aftereffects. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 273-276. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
50. Wiederhold, B. K., Davis, R., & Wiederhold, M. D. (1998). The effects of immersiveness on physiology. In G. Riva, B. Wiederhold, & E. Molinari (Eds.), Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience (pp. 52-60). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
51. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240.