Arbitrary symbolism in natural language revisited: When word forms carry meaning

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Reilly, Jamie ^a   Westbury, Chris ^b   Kean, Jacob ^c   Peelle, Jonathan E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYMBOLISM; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; SYMBOLISM; YOUNG ADULT;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 84864701326     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042286     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Barca L, Burani C, Arduino LS, ((2002)) Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behav Res Meth Ins C 34:424-434.
2. Clark JM, Paivio A, ((2004)) Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms. Behav Res Meth Ins C 36:371-383.
3. Paivio A, ((1995)) Imagery and memory. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. The Cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge USA: MIT Press. pp. 977-986.
4. Paivio A, Walsh M, Bons T, ((1994)) Concreteness effects on memory: When and why? J Exp Psychol Learn 20:1196-1204.
5. Acheson DJ, Postle BR, MacDonald MC, ((2010)) The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn 36:17-36.
6. Boulenger V, Dacoppet N, Roy AC, Paulignan Y, Nazir TA, ((2007)) Differential effects of age-of-acquisition for concrete nouns and action verbs: Evidence for partly distinct representations? Cognition 103:131-146.
7. Crutch SJ, Ridha BH, Warrington EK, ((2006)) The different frameworks underlying abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from a bilingual patient with a semantic refractory access dysphasia. Neurocase 12:151-163.
8. Crutch SJ, Warrington EK, ((2005)) Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain 128:615-627.
9. de Groot AM, ((1989)) Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. J Exp Psychol Learn 15:824-845.
10. Kroll JF, Merves JS, ((1986)) Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. J Exp Psychol Learn 12:92-107.
11. Paivio A, ((1985)) Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Sadoski M, Paivio A, ((2001)) Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. pp. 236.
13. Strain E, Patterson K, Seidenberg MS, ((1995)) Semantic effects in single-word naming. J Exp Psychol Learn 21:1140-1154.
14. Walker I, Hulme C, ((1999)) Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. J Exp Psychol Learn 25:1256-1271.
15. Berndt RS, Haendiges AN, Burton MW, Mitchum CC, ((2002)) Grammatical class and imageability in aphasic word production: Their effects are independent. J Neurolinguist 15:353-371.
16. Crutch SJ, Warrington EK, ((2003)) Preservation of prepositional speech in a pure anomic: The importance of an abstract vocabulary. Neurocase 9:465-481.
17. Franklin S, Howard D, Patterson K, ((1994)) Abstract word meaning deafness. Cognitive Neuropsych 1:1-34.
18. Franklin S, Howard D, Patterson K, ((1995)) Abstract word anomia. Cognitive Neuropsych 12:549-566.
19. Barnes J, Whitwell JL, Frost C, Josephs KA, Rossor M, et al. ((2006)) Measurements of the amygdala and hippocampus in pathologically confirmed Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Arch Neurol-Chicago 63:1434-1439.
20. Breedin SD, Saffran EM, Coslett HB, ((1994)) Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychol 11:617-660.
21. Cipolotti L, Warrington EK, ((1995)) Semantic memory and reading abilities: A case report. J Int Neuropsy Soc 1:104-110.
22. Papagno C, Capasso R, Miceli G, ((2009)) Reversed concreteness effect for nouns in a subject with semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia 47:1138-48.
23. Reilly J, Cross K, Troiani V, Grossman M, ((2007)) Single word semantic judgments in Semantic Dementia: Do phonology and grammatical class count? Aphasiology 21:558-569.
24. Binder JR, Westbury C, McKiernan K, ((2005)) Distinct brain systems for processing abstract and concrete concepts. J Cognitive Neurosci 17:905-917.
25. Kounios J, Koenig P, Glosser G, DeVita C, Dennis K, et al. ((2003)) Category-specific medial temporal lobe activation and the consolidation of semantic memory: evidence from fMRI. Cognitive Brain Res 17:484-494.
26. Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio AR, ((1997)) A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia 35:1319-1327.
27. Pexman PM, Hargraves IS, Edwards JD, Henry LC, Goodyear BG, ((2007)) Neural correlates of concreteness in semantic categorization. J Cognitive Neurosci 19:1407-19.
28. Wise RJS, Howard D, Mummery CJ, Fletcher P, Leff A, et al. ((2000)) Noun imageability and the temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 38:985-994.
29. Kousta ST, Vigliocco G, Vinson DP, Andrews M, Del Campo E, ((2011)) The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. J Exp Psychol Gen 140:14-34.
30. Locke J (1685) An Essay on human understanding.
31. Paivio A, ((1991)) Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Can J Psychol 45:255-287.
32. Schwanenflugel PJ, Akin CE, Luh W, ((1992)) Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Mem Cognition 20:96-104.
33. Reilly J, Kean J, ((2007)) Formal distinctiveness of high- and low-imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. Cognitive Sci 31:1-12.
34. Westbury C, Moroschan G, ((2009)) Imageability x phonology interactions in lexical access. Mental Lexicon 4:115-145.
35. Davis MH, Johnsrude IS, ((2007)) Hearing speech sounds: top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception. Hearing Res 229:132-47.
36. Gleitman LR, Gleitman H, ((1992)) A picture is worth a thousand words, but that's the problem: The role of syntax in vocabulary acquisition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1:31-35.
37. Lederer A, Gleitman H, Gleitman L, ((1995)) Verbs of a feather flock together: Semantic information in the structure of maternal speech. In: Tomasello M, editor. Merriman WE, editors. Beyond names for things: Young children's acquisition of verbs. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 277-297.
38. Lidz J, Gleitman HM, Gleitman LR, ((2004)) Kidz in the 'Hood: Syntactic Bootstrapping and the Mental Lexicon. In: Hall, DG, editors. Waxman SR, editors. Weaving a lexicon. Cambridge USA: MIT Press. pp. 603-636.
39. Pinker S, ((1987)) The bootstrapping problem in language acquisition. In: MacWhinney, B, editor. Mechanisms of language aquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. pp. 399-441.
40. Albright A, Hayes B, ((2003)) Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition 90:119-161.
41. Kelly MH, ((1992)) Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychol Rev 99:349-364.
42. Monaghan P, Chater N, Christiansen MH, ((2005)) The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. Cognition 96:143-182.
43. Chomsky N, Halle M, ((1968)) The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row. pp. 488p.
44. Langenmayr A, Gozutok M, Gust J, ((2001)) Remembering more nouns than verbs in lists of foreign-language words as an indicator of syntactic phonetic symbolism. Percept Motor Skill 93:843-850.
45. Cassidy KW, Kelly MH, ((2001)) Children's use of phonology to infer grammatical class in vocabulary learning. Psychon B Rev 8:519-523.
46. Dikker S, Rabagliati H, Farmer TA, Pylkkänen M, ((2010)) Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality. Psychol Sci 21:629-634.
47. Jusczyk PW, Luce PA, Charles-Luce J, ((1994)) Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. J Mem Lang 33:630-645.
48. Saffran JR, ((2003)) Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 12:110-114.
49. Saffran JR, Aslin RN, Newport EL, ((1996)) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274:1926-1928.
50. Saffran JR, Thiessen ED, ((2003)) Pattern induction by infant language learners. Dev Psychol 39:484-494.
51. Thiessen ED, Saffran JR, ((2003)) When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Dev Psychol 39:706-716.
52. Thiessen ED, Saffran JR, ((2007)) Learning to learn: Infants' acquisition of stress-based strategies for word segmentation. Lang Learn 3:73-100.
53. Shukla M, White KS, Aslin RN, ((2011)) Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:6038-6043.
54. Yang CD, ((2004)) Universal Grammar, statistics or both? Trends Cogn Sci 8:451-456.
55. Christiansen MH, Onnis L, Hockema SA, ((2009)) The secret is in the sound: From unsegmented speech to lexical categories. Developmental Science 12:388-395.
56. Monaghan P, Christiansen MH, ((2010)) Words in puddles of sound: Modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation. J Child Lang 37:545-564.
57. Monaghan P, Christiansen MH, Fitneva SA, ((2011)) The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. J Exp Psychol Gen 140:325-347.
58. Reali F, Christiansen MH, ((2005)) Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Sci 29:1007-1028.
59. Nygaard LC, Cook AE, Namy LL, ((2009)) Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition 112:181-186.
60. Farmer TA, Christiansen MH, Monaghan P, ((2006)) Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12203-8.
61. Saussure F (1907/1916) Cours de linguistique generale. London: Peter Owen [trans].
62. Dell GS, O'Seaghdha PG, ((1992)) Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 42:287-314.
63. Levelt WJM, Roelofs A, Meyer AS, ((1999)) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci 22:1-75.
64. Marslen-Wilson W, Moss HE, van Halen S, ((1996)) Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. J Exp Psychol Human 22:1376-1392.
65. Nuckolls JB, ((1999)) The case for sound symbolism. Annu Rev Anthropol 28:225-252.
66. Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ, Hutchison KA, Kessler B, et al. ((2007)) The English Lexicon project. Behav Res Meth 39:445-459.
67. Reilly J, Grossman M, McCawley G, ((2006)) Concreteness effects in lexical processing of semantic dementia. Brain Lang 99:218-219.
68. Rastle K, Harrington J, Coltheart M, ((2002)) 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. Q J Exp Psychol-A 55:1339-1362.
69. Baayen RH, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L, ((1995)) The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium of the University of Pennsylvania.
70. Vitevitch MS, Luce PA, ((2004)) A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behav Res Meth, Inst C 36:481-487.
71. Frisch SA, Large NR, Pisoni DB, ((2000)) Perception of wordlikeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords. J Mem Lang 42:481-496.
72. Reilly J, ((2005)) A tale of two imageabilities: An interaction of sound and meaning in natural language perception. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering: USA.
73. Storkel HL, Armbruster J, Hogan TP, ((2006)) Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. J Speech Lang Hear R 49:1175-1192.
74. Cowan N, Wood NL, Nugent LD, Treisman M, ((1997)) There are two word-length effects in verbal short-term memory: Opposed effects of duration and complexity. Psychol Sci 8:290-295.
75. Coltheart M, ((1981)) The MRC Psycholinguistic database. Q J Exp Psychol 33:497-505.
76. Brysbaert M, New B, ((2009)) Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Meth 41:977-90.
77. Shaoul C, Westbury C, ((2010)) Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx. Behav Res Meth 42:393-413.
78. Shaoul C, Westbury C, ((2011)) HiDEx: The High dimensional explorer. In: McCarthy P, Boonthum C, editors. Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution. IGI Global. pp. 230-246.
79. Paivio A, Yuille JC, Madigan SA, ((1968)) Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. J Exp Psychol 76:1-25.
80. Cortese MJ, Simpson GB, Woolsey S, ((1997)) Effects of association and imageability on phonological mapping. Psychon Bull Rev 4:226-231.
81. Sadoski M, Kealy WA, Goetz ET, Paivio A, ((1997)) Concreteness and imagery effects in the written composition of definitions. J Educ Psychol 89:518-526.
82. Shibahara N, Zorzi M, Hill MP, Wydell T, Butterworth B, ((2003)) Semantic effects in word naming: Evidence from English and Japanese Kanji. Q J Exp Psychol-A 56:263-286.
83. Strain E, Herdman CM, ((1999)) Imageability effects in word naming: An individual differences analysis. Can J Exp Psychol 53:347-359.
84. Strain E, Patterson K, Seidenberg MS, ((2002)) Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency. J Exp Psychol Learn 28:207-220.
85. Woollams AM, ((2005)) Imageability and ambiguity effects in speeded naming: Convergence and divergence. J Exp Psychol Learn 31:878-890.
86. Coltheart V, Laxon VJ, Keating C, ((1988)) Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading. Brit J Psychol 79:1-12.
87. Schwanenflugel PJ, Shoben EJ, ((1983)) Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. J Exp Psychol Learn 9:82-102.
88. Schwanenflugel PJ, Stowe RW, ((1989)) Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Read Res Quar 24:114-126.
89. Westbury C, Buchanan L, ((2006)) Toward a frontal lobe disconnection model of deep dyslexia: The role of semantic feedback in phonological false memories. J Neuroling 19:124-156.
90. Balota DA, Cortese MJ, Sergent-Marshall SD, Spieler DH, Yap MJ, ((2004)) Visual Word Recognition of Single-Syllable Words. J Exp Psychol Gen 133:283-316.
91. Yap MJ, Balota DA, ((2009)) Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. J Mem Lang 60:502-529.
92. Yap MJ, Balota DA, Sibley DE, Ratcliff R, ((2012)) Individual differences in visual word recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. J Exp Psychol Human 38:53-79.
93. SommersM (2011) Washington University Speech and Hearing Lab Neighborhood Database. http://128.252.27.56/Neighborhood/Home.asp.
94. Rastle K, Davis MH, ((2002)) On the complexities of measuring naming. J Exp Psychol Human 28:307-314.
95. Spieler DH, Balota DA, ((1997)) Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychol Sci 8:411-416.
96. Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J, ((2001)) DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev 108:204-256.
97. Plaut DC, McClelland JL, Seidenberg MS, Patterson K, ((1996)) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychol Rev 103:56-115.
98. Seidenberg MS, McClelland JL, ((1989)) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol Rev 96:523-568.
99. Dell GS, ((1986)) A spreading activation theory of retrieval in language production. Psychol Rev 93:283-321.
100. Regier T, ((2005)) The Emergence of words: Attentional learning in form and meaning. Cognitive Sci 29:819-865.
101. Piantadosi ST, Tily H, Gibson E, ((2011)) Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3526-3529.
102. Zipf G (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Oxford: Addison Wesley Press.
103. Reilly J, Kean J, ((2011)) Information content and word frequency in natural language: word length matters. P Natl Acad Sci USA. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103550108.
104. Piantadosi SE, Tily E, Gibson E, ((2011)) Reply to Reilly and Kean: Clarifications on word length and information content. P Natl Acad Sci USA. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103550108.
105. Cutler A, ((1981)) Making up materials is a confounded nuisance: or Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition 10:65-70.
106. Lund K, Burgess C, ((1996)) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behav Res Meth Inst C 28:203-208.