Hearing speech sounds: Top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception

Hearing Research

Volumn 229, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 132-147

  Davis, Matthew H ^a   Johnsrude, Ingrid S ^b  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Categorical perception; Feedback; fMRI; Frontal lobe; Lexical segmentation; Perceptual grouping; Perceptual learning; Speech perception; Temporal lobe

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

COGNITION; HEARING; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROBIOLOGY; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 34250348668     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (176)

1. Ahissar E., Nagarajan S., Ahissar M., Protopapas A., Mahncke H., and Merzenich M.M. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001) 13367-13372
2. Andruski J.E., Blumstein S.E., and Burton M. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition 52 (1994) 163-187
3. Baddeley A.D. Working Memory (1986), Clarendon Press, Oxford, Oxfordshire
4. Bailey P.J., and Summerfield Q. Information in speech: observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 6 (1980) 536-563
5. Barker J., and Cooke M. Is the sine-wave speech cocktail party worth attending?. Speech Commun. 27 (1999) 159-174
6. Brady S.A., and Darwin C.J. Range effect in the perception of voicing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63 (1978) 1556-1558
7. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
8. Brent M.R. Towards a unified model of lexical acquisition and lexical access. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 26 (1997) 363-375
9. Brent M.R., and Cartwright T.A. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition 61 (1996) 93-125
10. Brugge J.F., Volkov I.O., Garell P.C., Reale R.A., and Howard M.A. Functional connections between auditory cortex on Heschl's gyrus and on the lateral superior temporal gyrus in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 90 (2003) 3750-3763
11. Buchsbaum B.R., Olsen R.K., Koch P., and Berman K.F. Human dorsal and ventral auditory streams subserve rehearsal-based and echoic processes during verbal working memory. Neuron 48 (2005) 687-697
12. Bybee J., and McClelland J.L. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. Linguist. Rev. 22 (2005) 381-410
13. Cairns P., Shillcock R., Chater N., and Levy J. Bootstrapping word boundaries: a bottom-up corpus based approach to speech segmentation. Cognitive Psychol. 33 (1997) 111-153
14. Callan D.E., Tajima K., Callan A.M., Kubo R., Masaki S., and Akahane-Yamada R. Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. Neuroimage 19 (2003) 113-124
15. Carlyon R.P., Cusack R., Foxton J.M., and Robertson I.H. Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (2001) 115-127
16. Carlyon R.P., Deeks J., Norris D., and Butterfield S. The continuity illusion and vowel identification. Acta Acust. Unit. Acust. 88 (2002) 408-415
17. Christiansen M.H., Allen J., and Seidenberg M.S. Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: a connectionist model. Lang. Cognitive Process. (1998) 13
18. Clarke C.M., and Garrett M.F. Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (2004) 3647-3658
19. Crowder R.G. The purity of auditory memory. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 302 (1983) 251-265
20. Crowder R.G., and Morton J. Precategorical acoustic storage. Percept. Psychophy. 5 (1969) 365-373
21. Cutler A., and Carter D.M. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Comput. Speech Lang. 2 (1987) 133-142
22. Cutler A., and Norris D. The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14 (1988) 113-121
23. Cutting J.E. Aspects of phonological fusion. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 104 (1975) 105-120
24. Davis M.H. Connectionist modelling of lexical segmentation and vocabulary acquisition. In: Quinlan P.T. (Ed). Connectionist Models of Development (2003), Psychology Press, Hove, UK
25. Davis M.H., and Johnsrude I.S. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003) 3423-3431
26. Davis M.H., Marslen-Wilson W.D., and Gaskell M.G. Leading up the lexical garden path: segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (2002) 218-244
27. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S., Hervais-Adelman A., Taylor K., and McGettigan C. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134 (2005) 222-241
28. Davis, M.H., Coleman, M.R., Absalom, A., Rodd, J.M., Johnsrude, I.S., Matta, B., Owen, A.M., Menon, D.K., in preparation. Dissociating Speech Perception and Comprehension at Reduced Levels of Awareness: An fMRI Study with Graded Propofol Sedation.
29. de la Mothe L.A., Blumell S., Kajikawa Y., and Hackett T.A. Cortical connections of the auditory cortex in marmoset monkeys: core and medial belt regions. J. Comp. Neurol. 496 (2006) 27-71
30. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Pallier C., Serniclaes W., Sprenger-Charolles L., Jobert A., and Dehaene S. Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. Neuroimage 24 (2005) 21-33
31. Diamond I.T., Jones E.G., and Powell T.P. The projection of the auditory cortex upon the diencephalon and brain stem in the cat. Brain Res. 15 (1969) 305-340
32. Doupe A.J., and Kuhl P.K. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22 (1999) 567-631
33. Eisner F., and McQueen J.M. Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (2006) 1950-1953
34. Elman J.L., and McClelland J.L. Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. J. Mem. Lang. 27 (1988) 143-165
35. Fadiga L., Craighero L., Buccino G., and Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15 (2002) 399-402
36. Felleman D.J., and Essen D.C.V. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1 (1991) 1-47
37. Fodor J.A., and Bever T.G. The psychological reality of linguistic segments. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 4 (1965) 414-420
38. Foxe J.J., and Simpson G.V. Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans. A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Exp. Brain Res. 142 (2002) 139-150
39. Frankish C. Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 15 (1989) 469-479
40. Friederici A.D., Meyer M., and von Cramon D.Y. Auditory language comprehension: an event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain Lang. 74 (2000) 289-300
41. Fritz J.B., Elhilali M., and Shamma S.A. Differential dynamic plasticity of A1 receptive fields during multiple spectral tasks. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 7623-7635
42. Ganong III W.F. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 6 (1980) 110-125
43. Gao E., and Suga N. Experience-dependent plasticity in the auditory cortex and the inferior colliculus of bats: role of the corticofugal system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 8081-8086
44. Garrett M., Bever T.G., and Fodor J.A. The active use of grammar in speech perception. Percept. Psychophys. 1 (1965) 30-32
45. Garrod S., and Pickering M.J. Why is conversation so easy?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 8-11
46. Gaskell M.G., and Marslen-Wilson W.D. Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22 (1996) 144-158
47. Gaskell M.G., and Marslen-Wilson W.D. Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception. Lang. Cognitive Process. 12 (1997) 613-656
48. Giraud A.L., Kell C., Thierfelder C., Sterzer P., Russ M.O., Preibisch C., and Kleinschmidt A. Contributions of sensory input, auditory search and verbal comprehension to cortical activity during speech processing. Cereb. Cortex 14 (2004) 247-255
49. Goldinger S.D. Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22 (1996) 1166-1183
50. Goldinger S.D. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychol. Rev. 105 (1998) 251-279
51. Goldinger S.D., Kleider H.M., and Shelley E. The marriage of perception and memory: Creating two-way illusions with words and voices. Mem. Cogn. 27 (1999) 328-338
52. Golestani N., and Zatorre R.J. Learning new sounds of speech: reallocation of neural substrates. Neuroimage 21 (2004) 494-506
53. Greenlee J.D., Oya H., Kawasaki H., Volkov I.O., Kaufman O.P., Kovach C., Howard M.A., and Brugge J.F. A functional connection between inferior frontal gyrus and orofacial motor cortex in human. J. Neurophysiol. 92 (2004) 1153-1164
54. Guenther F.H., Ghosh S.S., and Tourville J.A. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang. 96 (2006) 280-301
55. Hackett, T.A., Kaas, J.H., 2004. Auditory cortex in primates: functional subdivisions and processing streams. The Cognitive Neurosciences, third ed.
56. Hackett T.A., Stepniewska I., and Kaas J.H. Subdivisions of auditory cortex and ipsilateral cortical connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 394 (1998) 475-495
57. Hackett T.A., Stepniewska I., and Kaas J.H. Prefrontal connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. Brain Res. 817 (1999) 45-58
58. Harnad S. Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
59. Harris C.L. Coarse coding and the lexicon. In: Fuchs C., and Victorri B. (Eds). Continuity in Linguistic Semantics (1994), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Holland
60. Hartley T., and Houghton G. A linguistically constrained model of short term memory for nonwords. J. Mem. Lang. 35 (1996) 1-31
61. Hawkins S. Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. J. Phonetics 31 (2003) 373-405
62. Hervais-Adelman, A., Davis, M.H., Carlyon, R.P., Johnsrude, I.S., submitted for publication. Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: Effects of feedback and lexicality.
63. Hickok G., and Poeppel D. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92 (2004) 67-99
64. Houde J.F., and Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279 (1998) 1213-1216
65. Howard M.A., Volkov I.O., Mirsky R., Garell P.C., Noh M.D., Granner M., Damasio H., Steinschneider M., Reale R.A., Hind J.E., and Brugge J.F. Auditory cortex on the human posterior superior temporal gyrus. J. Comp. Neurol. 416 (2000) 79-92
66. Howell P. Syllabic and phonemic representations for short-term memory of speech stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 24 (1978) 496-500
67. Howell P., and Darwin C.J. Some properties of auditory memory for rapid formant transitions. Mem. Cogn. 5 (1977) 700-708
68. Huffman R.F., and Henson O.W. The descending auditory pathway and acousticomotor systems: connections with the inferior colliculus. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 15 (1990) 295-323
69. Humphries C., Love T., Swinney D., and Hickok G. Response of anterior temporal cortex to syntactic and prosodic manipulations during sentence processing. Hum. Brain Mapp. 26 (2005) 128-138
70. Humphries C., Binder J.R., Medler D.A., and Liebenthal E. Syntactic and semantic modulation of neural activity during auditory sentence comprehension. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18 (2006) 665-679
71. Indefrey P., and Cutler A. Prelexical and lexical processing in listening. In: Gazzaniga M.S. (Ed). The Cognitive Neurosciences. third ed. (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 759-774
72. Jacoby L.L., Allan L.G., Collins J.C., and Larwill L.K. Memory influences subjective experience: noise judgements. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 14 (1988) 240-247
73. Jacquemot C., Pallier C., LeBihan D., Dehaene S., and Dupoux E. Phonological grammar shapes the auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003) 9541-9546
74. Johnsrude, I.S., Davis, M.H., Horwitz, B., in preparation. Multiple processing pathways in speech comprehension.
75. Jones E.G. Chemically defined parallel pathways in the monkey auditory system. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 999 (2003) 218-233
76. Kaas J.H., Hackett T.A., and Tramo M.J. Auditory processing in primate cerebral cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9 (1999) 164-170
77. Kello C.T., and Plaut D.C. A neural network model of the articulatory-acoustic forward mapping trained on recordings of articulatory parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (2004) 2354-2364
78. Kemps R.J., Ernestus M., Schreuder R., and Baayen R.H. Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: the case of Dutch plural nouns. Mem. Cogn. 33 (2005) 430-446
79. Kersten D., and Yuille A. Bayesian models of object perception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13 (2003) 150-158
80. Kolinsky R., and Morais J. Représentations intermédiaires dans la reconnaissance de la parole: Apports de la technique de création de mots illusoires. Proceedings of the 19th journées d'étude sur la parole (1992), SFA, ULB, Brussels 129-133
81. Kolinsky R., and Morais J. Migrations in speech recognition. Lang. Cogn. Process. 11 (1996) 611-619
82. Kraljic T., and Samuel A.G. Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?. Cogn. Psychol. 51 (2005) 141-178
83. Krauss R.M., and Pardo J.S. Speaker perception and social behavior: bridging social psychology and speech science. In: Van Lange P.A.M. (Ed). Bridging Social Psychology: Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA
84. Kuhl P.K. Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5 (2004) 831-843
85. Lehiste I. Isochrony reconsidered. J. Phonetics 5 (1977) 253-263
86. Liberman A.M., and Whalen D.H. On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Science 4 (2000) 187-196
87. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P., and Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 74 (1967) 431-461
88. Logan J.S., Lively S.E., and Pisoni D.B. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89 (1991) 874-886
89. Luce P.A., and Lyons E.A. Specificity of memory representations for spoken words. Mem. Cogn. 26 (1998) 708-715
90. Luria A.R. The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology (Basil Haigh, Trans.) (1976), Penguin Books, London, UK
91. MacKay D.G., Wulf G., Yin C., and Abrams L. Relations between word perception and production: New theory and data on the verbal transformation effect. J. Mem. Lang. 32 (1993) 624-646
92. MacMillan N.A. Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: a psychophysical approach to processing modes. In: Harnad S. (Ed). Categorical Perception (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
93. Magnuson J.S., McMurray B., Tanenhaus M.K., and Aslin R.N. Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past. Cogn. Sci. 27 (2003) 285-298
94. Mann V.A., and Liberman A.M. Some differences between phonetic and auditory modes of perception. Cognition 14 (1983) 211-235
95. Marslen-Wilson W. Function and processing in spoken word recognition: a tutorial review. In: Bouma H., and Bouwhuis D.G. (Eds). Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processing (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ
96. Marslen-Wilson W., and Warren P. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. Psychol. Rev. 101 (1994) 653-675
97. Marslen-Wilson W., Moss H.E., and van Halen S. Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22 (1996) 1376-1392
98. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., and Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychol. Rev. 101 (1994) 3-33
99. Mattys S.L. The use of time during lexical processing and segmentation: A review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4 (1997) 310-329
100. Mattys S.L. Stress versus coarticulation: toward an integrated approach to explicit speech segmentation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30 (2004) 397-408
101. Mattys S.L., White L., and Melhorn J.F. Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134 (2005) 477-500
102. Maye, J., Aslin, R.N., Tanenhaus, M.K., in press. The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent.
103. McCandliss B.D., Fiez J.A., Protopapas A., Conway M., and McClelland J.L. Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cogn. Affect Behav. Neurosci. 2 (2002) 89-108
104. McClelland J.L., and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cogn. Psychol. 18 (1986) 1-86
105. McClelland J.L., Mirman D., and Holt L.L. Are there interactive processes in speech perception?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (2006) 363-369
106. McMurray B., Tanenhaus M.K., and Aslin R.N. Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition 86 (2002) B33-B42
107. McQueen J.M. Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. J. Mem. Lang. 39 (1998) 21-46
108. Miller J.L. The effect of speaking rate on segmental distinctions: acoustic variation and perceptual compensation. In: Eimas P.D., and Miller J.L. (Eds). Perspectives on the Study of Speech (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
109. Miller J.L., and Liberman A.M. Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Percept. Psychophys. 25 (1979) 457-465
110. Mirman, D., McClelland, J.L., Holt, L.L., in press. An Interactive Hebbian Account of Lexically Guided Tuning of Speech Perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Available from: .
111. Morais J., Cary L., Alegria J., and Bertelson P. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?. Cognition 7 (1979) 323-331
112. Morais J., Bertelson P., Cary L., and Alegria J. Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition 24 (1986) 45-64
113. Morton J., Crowder R.G., and Prussin H.A. Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect. J. Exp. Psychol. 91 (1971) 169-190
114. Mottonen R., Calvert G.A., Jaaskelainen I.P., Matthews P.M., Thesen T., Tuomainen J., and Sams M. Perceiving identical sounds as speech or non-speech modulates activity in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage 30 (2006) 563-569
115. Nakatani L.H., and Dukes K.D. Locus of segmental cues for word juncture. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62 (1977) 715-719
116. Narain C., Scott S.K., Wise R.J., Rosen S., Leff A., Iversen S.D., and Matthews P.M. Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 13 (2003) 1362-1368
117. Nearey T. Phoneme-like units and speech perception. Lang. Cogn. Process. 16 (2001) 673-681
118. Norris D. Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52 (1994) 189-234
119. Norris D., McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Perceptual learning in speech. Cogn. Psychol. 47 (2003) 204-238
120. Pallier C., Colome A., and Sebastian-Galles N. The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-Based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychol. Sci. 12 (2001) 445-449
121. Peelle J.E., and Wingfield A. Dissociations in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed speech. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31 (2005) 1315-1330
122. Perkell J., Matthies M., Lane H., Guenther F., Wilhelms-Tricarico R., Wozniak J., and Guiod P. Speech motor control: acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models. Speech Commun. 22 (1997) 227-250
123. Perrot X., Ryvlin P., Isnard J., Guenot M., Catenoix H., Fischer C., Mauguiere F., and Collet L. Evidence for corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory activity in humans. Cereb. Cortex 16 (2006) 941-948
124. Petrides M., and Pandya D.N. Association fiber pathways to the frontal cortex from the superior temporal region in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 273 (1988) 52-66
125. Petrides M., and Pandya D.N. Association pathways of the prefrontal cortex and functional observations. Prin. Frontal Lobe Funct. (2002) 31-50
126. Petrides M., and Pandya D.N. Efferent association pathways originating in the caudal prefrontal cortex in the macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 498 (2006) 227-251
127. Pickering M.J., and Garrod S. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 27 (2004) 169-190 discussion 190-226
128. Pisoni D.B., and Tash J. Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Percept. Psychophys. 15 (1974) 285-290
129. Pitt M., and McQueen J. Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon?. J. Mem. Lang. 39 (1998) 347-370
130. Pitt M.A., and Samuel A.G. An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19 (1993) 699-725
131. Pitt M.A., and Shoaf L. Linking verbal transformations to their causes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (2002) 150-162
132. Plomp R. The Intelligent Ear (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
133. Poeppel, D., Idsardi, W.J., van Wassenhove, V., in press. Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.
134. Price C., Thierry G., and Griffiths T. Speech-specific auditory processing: where is it?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 (2005) 271-276
135. Pulvermuller F., Huss M., Kherif F., Moscoso del Prado Martin F., Hauk O., and Shtyrov Y. Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 7865-7870
136. Purcell D.W., and Munhall K.G. Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) 966-977
137. Read C., Zhang Y.F., Nie H.Y., and Ding B.Q. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition 24 (1986) 31-44
138. Remez R.E., Fellowes J.M., and Rubin P.E. Talker identification based on phonetic information. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23 (1997) 651-666
139. Remez R.E., Rubin P.E., Pisoni D.B., and Carrell T.D. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science 212 (1981) 947-949
140. Remez R.E., Rubin P.E., Berns S.M., Pardo J.S., and Lang J.M. On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychol. Rev. 101 (1994) 129-156
141. Rizzolatti G., and Arbib M.A. Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 21 (1998) 188-194
142. Romanski L., Tian B., Fritz J., Mishkin M., Goldman-Rakic P., and Rauschecker J. Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999) 1131-1136
143. Romanski L.M., Bates J.F., and Goldman-Rakic P.S. Auditory belt and parabelt projections to the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 403 (1999) 141-157
144. Rosen S. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 336 (1992) 367-373
145. Rosen S.M. Range and frequency effects in consonant categorization. J. Phonetics 7 (1979) 393-402
146. Rozzi S., Calzavara R., Belmalih A., Borra E., Gregoriou G.G., Matelli M., and Luppino G. Cortical connections of the inferior parietal cortical convexity of the macaque monkey. Cereb. Cortex 16 (2006) 1389-1417
147. Salverda A.P., Dahan D., and McQueen J.M. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition 90 (2003) 51-89
148. Sawusch J.R., and Nusbaum H.C. Contextual effects in vowel perception I: anchor-induced contrast effects. Percept. Psychophys. 25 (1979) 292-302
149. Schroeder C.E., Smiley J., Fu K.G., McGinnis T., O'Connell M.N., and Hackett T.A. Anatomical mechanisms and functional implications of multisensory convergence in early cortical processing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 50 (2003) 5-17
150. Scott S.K., and Johnsrude I.S. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci. 26 (2003) 100-107
151. Scott S.K., Blank C.C., Rosen S., and Wise R.J.S. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 123 (2000) 2400-2406
152. Seltzer B., and Pandya D.N. Frontal lobe connections of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 281 (1989) 97-113
153. Seltzer B., and Pandya D.N. Post-rolandic cortical projections of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 312 (1991) 625-640
154. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., and Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270 (1995) 303-304
155. Sheffert S.M., Pisoni D.B., Fellowes J.M., and Remez R.E. Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (2002) 1447-1469
156. Shoaf L.C., and Pitt M.A. Does node stability underlie the verbal transformation effect? A test of node structure theory. Percept. Psychophys. 64 (2002) 795-803
157. Shockley K., Sabadini L., and Fowler C.A. Imitation in shadowing words. Percept. Psychophys. 66 (2004) 422-429
158. Shore S.E., and Zhou J. Somatosensory influence on the cochlear nucleus and beyond. Hear. Res. 217 (2006) 90-99
159. Thomas, S. M., Pilling, M., 2006. Auditory and audiovisual perceptual training using a simulation of a cochlear-implant system. Poster presented at the British Society of Audiology Short Papers Meeting on Experimental Studies of Hearing and Deafness. Cambridge, UK, September 2006.
160. Uppenkamp S., Johnsrude I.S., Norris D., Marslen-Wilson W., and Patterson R.D. Locating the initial stages of speech-sound processing in human temporal cortex. Neuroimage 31 (2006) 1284-1296
161. Warren R. Verbal transformation effect and auditory perceptual mechanisms. Psychol. Bull. 70 (1968) 261-270
162. Warren R.M. Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 167 (1970) 392-393
163. Warren R.M., and Gregory R.L. An auditory analogue of the visual reversible figure. Am. J. Psychol. 71 (1958) 612-613
164. Watkins K., and Paus T. Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: the role of Broca's area. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 978-987
165. Watkins K.E., Strafella A.P., and Paus T. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 989-994
166. Watkins O.C., and Watkins M.J. The modality effect and echoic persistence. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 109 (1980) 251-278
167. Weill, S.A., 2003. The Impact of Perceptual Dissimilarity on the Perception of Foreign Accented Speech. Ph.D,, Ohio State University.
168. Weinberg R.J. Are topographic maps fundamental to sensory processing?. Brain Res. Bull. 44 (1997) 113-116
169. Werker J.F., and Tees R.C. Influences on infant speech processing: toward a new synthesis. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 50 (1999) 509-535
170. Whalen D.H., and Liberman A.M. Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception. Science 237 (1987) 169-171
171. Wilson S.M., and Iacoboni M. Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: Evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception. Neuroimage 33 (2006) 316-325
172. Wilson S.M., Saygin A.P., Sereno M.I., and Iacoboni M. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 701-702
173. Winer J.A. Decoding the auditory corticofugal systems. Hear. Res. 212 (2006) 1-8
174. Wise R.J., Scott S.K., Blank S.C., Mummery C.J., Murphy K., and Warburton E.A. Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. Brain 124 (2001) 83-95
175. Xiao Z., and Suga N. Modulation of cochlear hair cells by the auditory cortex in the mustached bat. Nat. Neurosci. 5 (2002) 57-63
176. Yeterian E.H., and Pandya D.N. Corticostriatal connections of the superior temporal region in rhesus monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 399 (1998) 384-402