The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 140, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 325-347

  Monaghan, Padraic ^a   Christiansen, Morten H ^b   Fitneva, Stanka A ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arbitrariness of the sign; Artificial language learning; Connectionist modeling; Language acquisition; Language evolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961184977     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022924     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Arciuli J., Cupples L. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:920-948. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000782.
2. Arciuli J., Cupples L. Would you rather 'embert a cudsert' or 'cudsert an embert'? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. Mental states: Language and cognitive structure 2007, 213-237. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. A. Schalley, D. Khlentzos (Eds.).
3. Baayen R.H., Pipenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) 1995, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Bergen B.K. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 2004, 80:290-311. doi: 10.1353/lan.2004.0056.
5. Black A.W., Clark R., Richmond K., King S., Zen H. Festival speech synthesizer (Version 1.95; CNRS) 2004, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
6. Borges J.L. John Wilkins' analytic language. Borges: Selected non-fictions 1942, 229-232. Penguin, New York, NY. E. Weinberger, E. Allen, S.J. Levine (Eds.).
7. Brandone A.C., Golinkoff R.M., Pence K.H., Hirsh-Pasek K. Action speaks louder than words: Young children differentially weight perceptual, social, and linguistic cues to learn verbs. Child Development 2007, 78:1322-1342. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01068.x.
8. Brooks P.B., Braine M.D.S., Catalano L., Brody R.E., Sudhalter V. Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32:76-95. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1005.
9. Bybee J. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form 1985, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
10. Cassidy K.W., Kelly M.H. Phonological information for grammatical category assignments. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:348-369. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90041-H.
11. Cassidy K.W., Kelly M.H. Children's use of phonology to infer grammatical class in vocabulary learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:519-523. doi: 10.3758/BF03196187.
12. Christiansen M.H., Chater N. Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2008, 31:489-509. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X08004998.
13. Clark A. Magic words: How language augments human computation. Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes 1998, 162-183. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. P. Carruthers, J. Boucher (Eds.).
14. Content A., Mousty P., Radeau M. BRULEX: Une base de donnés lexicales informatisé pour le français écrit et parlé [BRULEX: A computerized lexical database of written and spoken French]. Anné Psychologique 1990, 90:551-566. doi: 10.3406/psy.1990.29428.
15. Corballis M.C. From hand to mouth: The origins of language 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Cutler A., Hawkins J.A., Gilligan G. The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics 1985, 23:723-758. doi: 10.1515/ling.1985.23.5.723.
17. Darwin C. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex 1874, John Murray, London, England. 2nd ed.
18. de Saussure F. Course in general linguistics 1916, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
19. Dunn L., Dunn L. Peabody picture vocabulary test III 1997, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN.
20. Eco U. The search for the perfect language 1995, Blackwell, London, England.
21. Enrique-Arias A. Accounting for the position of verbal agreement morphology with psycholinguistic and diachronic explanatory factors. Studies in Language 2002, 26:1-31. doi: 10.1075/sl.26.1.02enr.
22. Farmer T.A., Christiansen M.H., Monaghan P. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2006, 103:12203-12208.
23. Fitneva S.A., Christiansen M.H., Monaghan P. From sound to syntax: Phonological constraints on children's lexical categorization of new words. Journal of Child Language 2009, 36:967-997. doi: 10.1017/S0305000908009252.
24. Fudge E. English word-stress 1984, George Allen & Unwin, London, England.
25. Gasser M. The origins of arbitrariness of language. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2004, 434-439. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. K. Forbus, D. Gentner, T. Regier (Eds.).
26. Gasser M., Sethuraman N., Hockema S. Iconicity in expressives: An empirical investigation. Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research 2011, 163-180. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA. J. Newman, S. Rice (Eds.).
27. Gliga T., Csibra G. One-year-old infants appreciate the referential nature of deictic gestures and words. Psychological Science 2009, 20:347-353. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02295.x.
28. Greenberg J. Essays in linguistics 1957, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
29. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Phonology, reading, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review 1999, 106:491-528.
30. Hawkins J.A., Cutler A. Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry. Explaining language universals 1988, 280-317. Blackwell, Oxford, England. J.A. Hawkins (Ed.).
31. Hawkins J.A., Gilligan G. Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order. Lingua 1988, 74:219-259. doi: 10.1016/0024-3841(88)90060-5.
32. Hinton L., Nichols J., Ohala J. Sound symbolism 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
33. Hockett C.F. The origin of speech. Scientific American 1960, September, 203(3):88-96. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88.
34. Hollich G., Hirsh-Pasek K., Golinkoff R. Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 2000, 65(Serial No. 262).
35. Hupp J.M., Sloutsky V.M., Culicover P.W. Evidence for a domain general mechanism underlying the suffixation preference in language. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24:876-909. doi: 10.1080/01690960902719267.
36. Imai M., Kita S., Nagumo M., Okada H. Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition 2008, 109:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015.
37. Kelly M.H. Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review 1992, 99:349-364. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.349.
38. Kovic V., Plunkett K., Westermann G. The shape of words in the brain. Cognition 2010, 114:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.016.
39. Lambon Ralph M.A., Ehsan S. Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:928-948. doi: 10.1080/13506280544000110.
40. Landauer T.K., Dumais S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 1997, 104:211-240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211.
41. Langdon M. Noise words in Guaraní. Sound symbolism 1984, 94-103. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. L. Hinton, J. Nichols, J. Ohala (Eds.).
42. Lindell A., Nicholls M., Castles A.E. The effect of orthographic uniqueness and deviation points on lexical decisions: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral- redundant presentations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 56A:287-307.
43. Mintz T.H. Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:678-686.
44. Monaghan P., Chater N., Christiansen M.H. The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorization. Cognition 2005, 96:143-182. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.001.
45. Monaghan P., Christiansen M.H. Why form-meaning mappings are not entirely arbitrary in language. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2006, 1838-1843. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R. Sun (Ed.).
46. Monaghan P., Christiansen M.H. Integration of multiple probabilistic cues in syntax acquisition. Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives 2008, 139-164. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. H. Behrens (Ed.).
47. Monaghan P., Christiansen M.H., Chater N. The phonological distributional coherence hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 55:259-305. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.12.001.
48. Monaghan P., Mattock K. Cross-situational language learning: The effects of grammatical categories as constraints on referential labeling. Proceedings of the Thirty First Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference 2009, 2226-2231. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. N. Taatgen, H. van Rijn (Eds.).
49. Nagumo, M., Imai, M., Kita, S., Haryu, E., & Kajikawa, S. (2006, June). Sound iconicity bootstraps verb meaning acquisition. Paper presented at the XVth International Conference of Infant Studies, Kyoto, Japan.
50. Nelson D.L., McEvoy C.L., Schreiber T.A. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004, 36:402-407.
51. Newmeyer F.J. Language form and language function 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
52. Nygaard L.C., Cook A.E., Namy L.L. Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition 2009, 112:181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.001.
53. Ohala J.J. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 1984, 41:1-16. doi: 10.1159/000261706.
54. Onnis L., Christiansen M.H. Lexical categories at the edge of the word. Cognitive Science 2008, 32:184-221. doi: 10.1080/03640210701703691.
55. Otis, K., & Sagi, E. (2008). Phonoaesthemes: A corpora-based analysis. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 65-70). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
56. Pinker S. Language learnability and language development 1984, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. Seidenberg M.S., Gonnerman L.M. Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:353-361. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1.
58. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523.
59. Shannon C.E. Prediction and entropy of printed English. The Bell System Technical Journal 1951, 30:50-64.
60. Spector F., Maurer D. Synesthesia: A new approach to understanding the development of perception. Developmental Psychology 2009, 45:175-189. doi: 10.1037/a0014171.
61. St.Clair M.C., Monaghan P., Christiansen M.H. Learning grammatical categories from distributional cues: Flexible frames for language acquisition. Cognition 2010, 116:341-360. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.012.
62. St.Clair M.C., Monaghan P., Ramscar M. Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:1317-1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01065.x.
63. Tamariz M. Exploring systematicity between phonological and context-co-occurrence representations of the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon 2008, 3:259-278. doi: 10.1075/ml.3.2.05tam.
64. Tomasello M. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition 2003, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
65. Ultan R. Size-sound symbolism. Universals of human language: Vol. 2. Phonology 1978, 525-568. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. J. Greenberg (Ed.).
66. Wilkins J. An essay towards a real character and a philosophical language 1668, Gellibrand, London, England.
67. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations 1953, Blackwell, Oxford, England.
68. Xu F., Tenenbaum J.B. Sensitivity to sampling in Bayesian word learning. Developmental Science 2007, 10:288-297. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00590.x.
69. Yoshida K.A., Fennell C.T., Swingley D., Werker J.F. Fourteen month-old infants learn similar sounding words. Developmental Science 2009, 12:412-418. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00789.x.