Professionalization of university teachers-Teaching approaches, professional vision and teacher identity in video-based training;Professionalisierung von Hochschullehrenden-Lehrbezogene Vorstellungen, Wissensanwendung und Identitätsentwicklung in einem videobasierten Qualifikationsprogramm

Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 233-251

  Johannes, Christine ^a   Seidel, Tina ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Higher education; Professional development; Professional vision; Teacher identity; Teacher thinking; University teaching; Video analysis; Video reflection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864336268     PISSN: 1434663X     EISSN: 18625215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11618-012-0273-0     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1990). Invalidity of true experiments. Evaluation Review, 14(4), 374-390. doi:10.1177/0193841X9001400403.
2. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschriftfür Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 469-520. doi:10.07/s11618-006-0165-2.
3. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001. (Pubitemid 38341311)
4. Blomberg, G. (2011). Der Einsatz von Unterrichtsvideos in der universitären Lehrerbildung. Diss., München: Technische Universität.
5. Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers' teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131-1140. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008.
6. Braun, E., & Hannover, B. (2008). Zum Zusammenhang zwischen Lehr-Orientierung und Lehrgestaltung von Hochschuldozierenden und subjektivem Kompetenzzuwachs bei Studierenden. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft 9, 277-291.
7. Bühner, M., & Ziegler, M. (2009). Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. München: Pearson Studium.
8. Coffey, M., & Gibbs, G. (2002). Measuring teachers' repertoire of teaching methods. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), 383-390. doi:10.1080/0260293022000001382.
9. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Hrsg.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing World: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
11. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning: How do teachers learn to teach? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Hrsg.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions and changing contexts (3.Aufl.). New York: Routledge.
12. Fendler, J., Seidel, T., & Johannes, C. (2011). Effekte hochschuldidaktischer Workshops auf den Lehransatz, das Wissen und die Selbstregulation von Hochschullehrenden. Manuscript, submitted for publication.
13. Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers' identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219-232. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002. (Pubitemid 43115450)
14. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Shulman, L. S. (2002). Toward expert thinking: How curriculum case writing prompts the development of theory-based professional knowledge in student teachers. Teaching Education, 13(2), 221-245. doi:10.1080/1047621022000007594.
15. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 4-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X031005003.
16. Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers' professional identity and its relation to drop-ping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1530-1543. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.003.
17. Hoogstraten, J. (1982). The retrospective pretest in an educational training context. Journal of Experimental Education, 50(4), 200-204.
18. Johannes, C., & Seidel, T. (2010). Professionelles Lernen von Anfängern in der Hochschul-lehre-Erwartungen und Vorstellungen über Hochschullehre im Rahmen des projekts LehreLernen. Personal-und Organisationsentwicklung in Einrichtungen der Lehre und Forschung (P-OE), 5(2+3), 31-40.
19. Johannes, C., Soellner, R., & Seidel, T. (2011a). Teaching and learning in university courses from teacher, student and video-based expertperspective. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Johannes, C., Fendler, J., Hoppert, A., & Seidel, T. (2011b). Projekt LehreLernen (2008-2010): Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Münster: Monsenstein und Vannerdat.
21. Johannes, C., Fendler, J., & Seidel, T. (in press). Teachers' perception of the learning environment and their knowledge base in a training program for novice university teachers. International Journal for Academic Development. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2012.681785.
22. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177-228. doi:10.3102/00346543072002177.
23. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255-275. doi:0.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X. (Pubitemid 127160103)
24. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285-298. doi:10.1080/ 03075070600680539. (Pubitemid 43704367)
25. Mälkki, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). From reflection to action? Barriers and bridges between higher education teachers' thoughts and actions. Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 33-50. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010. 492500.
26. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (7.Aufl.). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
27. McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors' teaching and students' learning. Instructional Science, 28(5-6), 363-385. doi:10.1023/A:1026583208230. (Pubitemid 33212726)
28. McAlpine, L., Weston, C., Timmermans, J., Berthiaume, D., & Fairbank-Roch, G. (2006). Zones: Reconceptualizing teacher thinking in relation to action. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 601-615. doi:10.1080/ 03075070600923426. (Pubitemid 44494874)
29. McLean, M., & Bullard, J. E. (2000). Becoming a university teacher: Evidence from teaching portfolios (how academics learn to teach). Teacher Development, 4(1), 79-101. doi:10.1080/13664530000200104.
30. Moore, D., & Tananis, C. A. (2009). Measuring change in a short-term educational program using a retrospective pretest design. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(2), 189-202. doi:10.1177/1098214009334506.
31. Nimon, K., Zigarmi, D., & Allen, J. (2011). Measures of program effectiveness based on retro-spective pretest data: Are all created equal? American Journal of Evaluation, 32(1), 8-28. doi:10.1177/1098214010378354.
32. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2008a). A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 56(1), 29-43. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9087-z.
33. Postareff, L., Katajavuori, N., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Trigwell, K. (2008b). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 49-61. doi:10.1080/ 03075070701794809.
34. Rimmele, R. (2009). Videograph: Das Programm zur Kodierung von Videoinhalten., Kiel. http://www.dervideograph.de/.Zugegriffen: 14. Juli 2011.
35. Seidel, T., & Hoppert, A. (2011). Merkmale von Lehre an der Hochschule: Ergebnisse zur Gestaltung von Hochschulseminaren mittels Videoanalysen. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 39(2), 154-172.
36. Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Rimmele, R., Dalehefte, I. M., Herweg, C., Kobarg, M., et al. (2006). Blicke auf den Physikunterricht. Ergebnisse der IPN Videostudie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(6), 798-821.
37. Seidel, T., Schwindt, K., Rimmele, R., & Prenzel, M. (2008). Konstruktivistische Überzeugungen von Lehrpersonen: Was bedeuten sie für den Unterricht? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft 9, 259-276.
38. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259-267. doi:10.1016/j.tate. 2010.08.009.
39. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers' professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Hrsg.), Video research in the learning sciences (S. 383-395). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
40. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. doi:10.1177/0022487108328155.
41. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 3-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
42. Skeff, K. M., Stratos, G. A., & Bergen, M. R. (1992). Evaluation of a medical faculty development program. Evaluation & the HealthProfessions, 15(3), 350-366. doi:10.1177/016327879201500307.
43. Stes, A. (2008). The impact of instructional development in higher education: Effects on teachers and students. Gent: Academia Press.
44. Stes, A., Min-Leliveld, M., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2010a). The impact of instructional development in higher education: The state-of-the-art of the research. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 25-49. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.07.00.
45. Stes, A., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2010b). Approaches to teaching in higher education: Validation of a dutch version of the approaches to teaching inventory. Learning Environments Research, 13(1), 59-73. doi:1007/s10984-009-9066-7.
46. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409-424. doi:0.1007/s10648-004-0007-9. (Pubitemid 40976018)
47. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ginns, P. (2005). Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised approaches to teaching inventory. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 349-360. doi:10.1080/07294360500284730. (Pubitemid 43084448)
48. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57-70. doi:10.1023/A:1003548313194.
49. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' ,learning to notice' in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005.
50. Young, M. S., Robinson, S., & Alberts, P. (2009). Students pay attention!: Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 41-55. doi:10.1177/1469787408100194.