Measuring teachers’ repertoire of teaching methods

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 383-390

  Coffey, Martin ^a   Gibbs, Graham ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26244458178     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293022000001382     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. COFFEY, M. & GIBBS, G. (2001) The use of the student evaluation of educational quality questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), pp. 89-93.
2. GIBBS, G. & COFFEY, M. (2000) Training university teachers: what are trainers trying to achieve and how could their success me measured?, Teacher Development, 4(1), pp. 31-44, I.
3. GILBERT, A. & GIBBS, G. (1998) A proposal for an international research programme to identify the impact of initial training on university teaching. Proceedings of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Annual Conference, Auckland, 1997.
4. MARSH, H. W. (1982) SEEQ: a reliable, valid and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), pp. 77-95.
5. RAMSDEN, P. (1991) A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire, Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), pp. 129-150.
6. TRIGWELL, K. & PROSSER, M. (1996) Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers' approach to teaching, Higher Education, 32(1), pp. 77-87.