Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 49-61

  Postareff, Liisa ^a   Katajavuori, Nina ^a   Lindblom Ylnne, Sari ^a   Trigwell, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149050707     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070701794809     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Åkerlind, G.S. 2003. Ciro wing and developing as a university teacher - Variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education 28: 375-90.
2. Biglan, A. 1973. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 204-13.
3. Cano, F. 2005. Consonance and dissonance in students' learning experience. Learning and Instruction 15: 201-23.
4. Eley, M.E. 2006. Teachers' conceptions of teaching, and the making of specific decisions in planning to teach. Higher Education 51: 191-214.
5. Entwistle, N., D. Skinner, D. Entwistle, and S. Orr. 2000. Conceptions and beliefs about 'Good Teaching': An integration of contrasting research areas. Higher Education Research & Development 19: 5-26.
6. Gibbs, G., and M. Coffey. 2004. The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education 5: 87-100.
7. Guskey, T. R. 2000. Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
8. Ho, A., D. Watkins, and M. Kelly. 2001. The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: an evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education 42: 143-69.
9. Kember, D. 1997. A rconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7: 255-75.
10. Kember, D., and K. Kwan. 2000. Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science 28: 469-90.
11. Lindblom-Ylänne, S. 2003. Broadening an understanding of the phenomenon of dissonance. Studies in Higher Education 28: 63-77.
12. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., and K. Lonka. 1999. Individual ways of interacting with the learning environment are they related to study success? Learning and Instruction 9: 1-18.
13. _. 2000. Dissonant study orchestrations of high-achieving university students. European Journal of Psychology of Education XV: 19-32.
14. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., K. Trigwell, A. Nevgi, and P. Ashwin. 2006. How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education 31: 285-98.
15. Lueddekc, G.R. 2003. Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: a study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching-scholarship'. Studies in Higher Education 28: 213-28.
16. Martin, E., and Lueckenhausen, G. 2005. How university teaching changes teachers: affective as well as cognitive challenges. Higher Education 49: 389-412.
17. Meyer, J.H.F. 2000. The modeling of 'dissonant' study orchestration in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education XV: 5-18.
18. Postareff, I.., and S. Lindblom-Ylänne. Forthcoming. Valuation in teachers' descriptions of teaching broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction.
19. Postareff, L., S. Lindblom-Ylänne, and A. Nevgi, A. 2007. The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 23: 557-571.
20. Prosser. M., P. Ramsden, K. Trigwell, and E. Martin. 2003. Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education 28: 37-48.
21. Prosser, M., M. Rickinson, V. Bence, A. Hanbury, and M. Kulej. 2006. Formative evaluation of accredited programmes. Higher Education Academy Report. hup://www.heacademy.ac.uk/research/Formative-Evaluationreport.rtf (accessed 31 August 2006).
22. Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell. 1997. Perceptions of the teaching environment and its relationship to approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 25-35.
23. _, 1999. Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
24. Prosser, M., K. Trigwell, E. Hazel, and F. Watcrhousc. 2000. Students' experiences of studying physics concepts: The effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches. European Journal of Psycholog)' of Education 15: 61-74.
25. Prosser, M., K. Trigwell, and P. Taylor. 1994. A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science teaching and learning, Learning Instruction 4: 217-31.
26. Richardson, J.T.E. 2005. Students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology 25: 673-80.
27. Samuelowicz, K., and J.D. Bain. 1992. Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education 24: 93-112.
28. _. 2001. Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education 41: 299-325.
29. Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser. 1996a. Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers' approach to teaching. Higher Education 32: 77-87.
30. _. 1996b. Changing approaches to teaching: a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education 21: 275-84.
31. Trigwell, K., M. Prosser, and F. Waterhouse. 1999. Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education 37: 57-70.
32. Trigwell, K., and S. Lindblom-Ylänne. 2005. How dimensions of university teaching are related to educational innovations. Paper presented at the 11th conference of the European Association for Research into Learning and Instruction, Cyprus, August.
33. Vermunt, J.D., and N. Verloop. 1999. Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction 9: 257-80.