A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education

Higher Education

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-43

  Postareff, Liisa ^a   Lindblom Ylänne, Sari ^a   Nevgi, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Approaches to teaching; Conceptions of teaching; Pedagogical training; Self efficacy beliefs; Teaching experience

Indexed keywords

EID: 44349133467     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-007-9087-z     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher - Variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 375-390.
2. Bailey, J. G. (1999). Academics' motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 343-359.
3. Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
4. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckinghamshire: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.
5. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
6. Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 204-213.
7. Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2004). Does practice make perfect? A slow and discontinuous process. In H. P. A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme, & H. Gruber (Eds.), Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert (pp. 73-95). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Coffey, M., & Gibbs, G. (2000). Can academics benefit from training? Some preliminary evidence. Teaching in HigherEducation, 5, 385-389.
9. Eley, M. E. (2006). Teachers' conceptions of teaching, and the making of specific decisions in planning to teach. Higher Education, 51, 191-214.
10. Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87-100.
11. Gordon, C., & Debus, R. (2002). Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. British Journal of Higher Education, 72, 483-511.
12. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
13. Ho, A., Watkins, D., & Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education, 42, 143-169.
14. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255-275.
15. Kember, D., & Kwan, K. (2000). Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469-490.
16. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Hämäläinen, K. (2004). The Bologna declaration as a tool to enhance learning and instruction at the University of Helsinki. International Journal for Academic Development, 9, 153-165.
17. Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A. (2003, August). The effect of pedagogical training and teaching experience on approach to teaching. (Paper presented at the 11th EARLI conference, Padua).
18. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285-298.
19. Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching-scholarship'. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 213-228.
20. Martin, E., & Lueckenhausen, G. (2005). How university teaching changes teachers: Affective as well as cognitive challenges. Higher Education, 49, 389-412.
21. McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors' teaching and students' learning. Instructional Science, 28, 363-385.
22. Norton, L., Richardson, J. T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers' beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher education, 50, 537-571.
23. Oosterheert, I. E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2003). Knowledge construction in learning to teach: The role of dynamic sources. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 9, 157-173.
24. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557-571.
25. Postareff, L., Katajavuori, N. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Trigwell, K. (in press). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education.
26. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science teaching and learning. Learning Instruction, 4, 217-231.
27. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Suffolk: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
28. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
29. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25, 673-680.
30. Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93-112.
31. Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299-325.
32. Sonesson, A., & Lindberg Sand, Å. (2006, June). Compulsory higher education teacher training in Sweden - a nucleus for scholarship of teaching and learning. (Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the International Consortium for Educational Development, Sheffield).
33. Strategic plan for the years 2007-2009. University of Helsinki. (2006). Helsinki: Helsinki University Printing House.
34. Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A. (2004, June). Variation in approaches to university teaching: The role of regulation and motivation. (Paper presented at the EARLI SIG Higher Education Conference, Baltic Sea).
35. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275-284.
36. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57-70.
37. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
38. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944-956.
39. van Keulen, H. (2006, June). Staff development and basic teacher qualification systems in The Netherlands, with a focus on Utrecht University. (Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the International Consortium for Educational Development, Sheffield).
40. Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257-280.