How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 285-298

  Lindblom Ylänne, Sari ^a,d   Trigwell, Keith ^b   Nevgi, Anne ^a   Ashwin, Paul ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Faculty of Behavioural Sciences   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646511133     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070600680539     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2003) Growing and developing as a university teacher - variation in meaning, Studies in Higher Education, 28, 376-390.
2. Bailey, J. G. (1999) Academics' motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research, Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 343-359.
3. Bandura, A. (1982) The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy, Journal of Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13, 195-199.
4. Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control (New York, W. H. Freeman).
5. Becher, T. (1987) The disciplinary shaping of the profession, in: B. R. Clark (Ed.) The academic profession (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press), 271-303.
6. Becher, T. (1989) Academic tribes and territories; intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (Buckingham, Open University Press).
7. Becher, T. (1994) The significance of disciplinary differences, Studies in Higher Education, 19, 151-161.
8. Biggs, J. (1999) Teaching for quality learning at university (Buckingham, Open University Press).
9. Biglan, A. (1973) Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university department, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 204-213.
10. Eley, M. G. (1992) Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students, Higher Education, 23, 231-254.
11. Gordon, C. & Debus, R. (2002) Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 483-511.
12. Kember, D. (1997) A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching, Learning and Instruction, 7, 255-275.
13. Kember, D. & Kwan, K. (2002) Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching, in: N. Hativa & P. Goodyear (Eds) Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (Dordrecht, Kluwer), 219-240.
14. Kolb, D. A. (1981) Learning styles and disciplinary differences, in A. W. Checkering & Associates (Eds) The modern American college (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass), 232-255.
15. Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A. (2003) How pedagogical training and context affect approach to teaching, paper presented at the 11th European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Conference, Padova, Italy, 26-30 August.
16. Lueddekc, G. (2003) Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: a study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching-scholarship', Studies in Higher Education, 28, 213-228.
17. Neumann, R. (2001) Disciplinary differences and university teaching, Studies in Higher Education, 2, 135-146.
18. Neumann, R., Parry, S. & Becher, T. (2002) Teaching and learning in their disciplinary context: a conceptual analysis, Studies in Higher Education, 4, 405-417.
19. Parry, S. (1998) Disciplinary discourse in doctoral theses, Higher Education, 3, 273-299.
20. Pintrich, P., Smith, D. A. F. & McKeachie, W. J. (1989) A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Ann Arbor, MI, National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan).
21. Pintrich, P. & Mckeachie, W. (2000) A framework for conceptualizing student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom, in: P. Pintrich & P. Ruohotie (Eds) Conative constructs and self-regulated learning (Saarijärvi, Finland, Research Centre for Vocational Education and The Okka Foundation for Teaching, Education and Personal Development), 31-50.
22. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A. (2004) The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education, paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Higher Education Special Interest Group conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 18-21 June.
23. Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999) Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education (Buckingham, Open University Press).
24. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. & Taylor, P. (1994) A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching, Learning and Instruction, 4, 217-231.
25. Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J. (1992) Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers, Higher Education, 24, 93-111.
26. Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001) Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning, Higher Education, 41, 299-325.
27. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences (2nd edn) (New York, McGraw-Hill).
28. Smeby, J. (1996) Disciplinary differences in university teaching, Studies in Higher Education, 1, 69-79.
29. Trigwell, K. (2002) Approaches to teaching design subjects: a quantitative analysis, An, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 1, 69-80.
30. Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A. (2004) Variation in approaches to university teaching: the role of regulation and motivation, paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Higher Education Special Interest Group conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 18-21 June.
31. Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1996) Changing approaches to teaching: a relational perspective, Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275-284.
32. Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory, Educational Psychology Review, 16, 409-424.
33. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Waterhouse, F. (1999) Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approach to learning, Higher Education, 37, 73-83.
34. Vermunt, J. D. & Verloop, N. (1999) Congruence and friction between learning and teaching, learning and Instruct ion, 9, 257-280.
35. Ylijoki, O.-H. (2000) Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying - a case study of four Finnish university departments, Higher Education, 39, 339-362.
36. Zimmerman, B. (2000) Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective, in: M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds) Handbook of self-regulation (San Diego, CA, Academic Press), 13-39.