Contextualizing the changing face of scaffolding research: Are we driving pedagogical theory development or avoiding it?

Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conf. Proc. - Community Events Proceedings, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conf.

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1037-1044

  Luckin, Rosemary ^a   Underwood, Joshua ^a   Looi, Chee Kit ^b   Chen, Wenli ^b   Puntambekar, Sadhana ^c   Fraser, Danae Stanton ^d   Tabak, Iris ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^e BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT SENSITIVE; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; THEORY DEVELOPMENT; UBIQUITOUS TECHNOLOGY;

RESEARCH;

SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84863338355     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (66)

1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Roll, I. & Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Toward tutoring help seeking - Applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3220 (pp. 227-39). Berlin: Springer-Verlag
2. Azevedo, R., Moos, D.C., Winters, F.W., Greene, J.A., Cromley, J.G., Olson, E.D. & Godbole-Chaudhuri, P. (2005). Why is externally-regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? In: Looi, C-K. McCalla, G. Bredeweg, B. & Breuker, J. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through intelligent and socially informed Technology (pp. 41-48). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press
3. Beal, C. & Lee, H. (2008). Mathematics motivation and achievement as predictors of high school students' guessing and help-seeking with instructional software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 507-514.
4. Brown, J. S. (1990). Toward a new Epistemology for Learning. In: Frasson C. & Gauthier G. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: At the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education (pp. 262-286). Norwood: Ablex.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
6. Butler, K. A. & Lumpe, A. (2008). Student use of scaffolding software: Relationships with motivation and conceptual understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 427-36
7. Casey, E. (2001). Between Geography and Philosophy: What does it mean to be in the Place-World? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91(4), 683-93.
8. Cassell, J. (2004). Towards a model of technology and literacy development: Story listening systems. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 75-105. (Pubitemid 38145872)
9. Chen, N., Wei, C-W., Wu, K-T. & Uden, L (1992). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners' reflection levels. Computers & Education, 52(2), 283-91.
10. Chen, W., Looi, C.K. & Wen, Y, (2011). A Scaffolded Software Tool for L2 Vocabulary Learning: GroupScribbles with Graphic Organizers, Proceedings of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2011, ISLS.
11. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A once and future Discipline. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Conole, G., Littlejohn, A., Falconer, I. & Jeffery, A. (2005). The LADIE lit review. [Online] Available athttp://www.elframework.org/refmodels/ ladie/ouputs/ LADIE%20lit%20review%20v15.doc [Accessed 12 August, 2008]
13. Crippen, K. J., & Earl, B. L. (2007). The impact of Web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 49(3), 809-21. (Pubitemid 46777160)
14. Cummins, S., Curtis, S., Diez-Roux, A., Macintyre, S. (2007). Understanding and representing 'Place' in Health Research: A relational Approach. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 1825-38. (Pubitemid 47503503)
15. Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in classroom systems. Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265-72.
16. Fitzpatrick, G. (2003). The Locales Framework: Understanding and Designing for Wicked Problems. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Frohberg, Göth, & Schwabe (2009). "Mobile Learning Projects - a Critical Analysis of the State of the Art", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 25(4), 307-331.
18. Ge, X. & Land, S. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving process using question prompts and peer interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, (2), 5-22. (Pubitemid 39051404)
19. Guzdial, M., Kolodner, J., Hmelo, C., Narayanan, H., Carlson, D., Rappin, N., Hubscher, R., Turns, J. and Newstetter, W. (1996). Computer support for learning through complex problem solving. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 43-45.
20. Harris, A. Bonnett, V., Luckin, R., Yuill, N. & Avramides, K. (2009). Scaffolding effective help-seeking behaviour in mastery and performance oriented learners. In: Dimitrova, V. Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay. & Graesser, A. (eds). Artificial Intelligence in Education. (pp. 425-32). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press,.
21. Holmes, J. (2005). Designing agents to support learning by explaining. Computers and Education, 48(4), 523-47.
22. Kalyuga, S. Ayres, P., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1),23-31. (Pubitemid 36400001)
23. Kay, J. (2009). 'Lifelong Learner Modelling for Lifelong Personalized Pervasive Learning', IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1(4),215-228.
24. Kerckhove, D. D. & Tursi, A. (2009). The Life of Space. Architectural Design 79 (1), 48-53.
25. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H. & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43
26. Lajoie, S. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor, Instructional Science, 33, (5-6), 541-557. (Pubitemid 41455849)
27. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Li, D. & Lim, C. (2008). Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1394-1410 (Pubitemid 351483950)
30. Li, S., Zhang, B.H., Looi, C.K. and Chen, W. (submitted for publication). Understanding Mobile Learning from the Perspective of Self-Regulated Learning.
31. Looi, C.K., P. Seow, B.H. Zhang, H.J. So, W. Chen and L.H. Wong, (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. Br. J. Educational Technology, 41, 154-169.
32. Looi, C. K., Chen, W., & Ng, F.-K. (2010). Collaborative activities enabled by GS (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54(1), 14-26.
33. Luckin, R., Connolly, D., Plowman, L. & Airey, S. (2003). With a little Help from my Friends: Children's Interactions with Interactive Toy Technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (Special issue on Children and Technology), 19(2), 165-76. (Pubitemid 38422529)
34. Luckin, R. (2010) Re-designing Learning Contexts, London: Routledge
35. Marshall, P., Fleck, R., Harris, A. Rick, J., Hornecker, E., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N. and Dalton, N. S. (2009). Fighting for control: children's embodied interactions when using physical and digital representations, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2149-2152). Boston, MA: ACM.
36. Moher, T., Hussain, S., Halter, T. & Kilb, D. (2005). RoomQuake: Embedding dynamic phenomena within the physical space of an elementary school classroom. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1655-68) 2-7 Apr 2005. Oregon: ACM Press.
37. Moher, T., Uphoff, B.; Bhatt, D., López Silva, B. and Malcolm, P. (2008). WallCology: Designing Interaction Affordances for Learner Engagement in Authentic Science Inquiry Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 163-172) 5-10 Apr 2008. Florence, Italy: ACM Press.
38. Nardi, B. (1996). Studying Context: A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Models and Distributed Cognition. In: B. A. Nardi (ed.) Context and Consciousness. Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
39. Nussbaum M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S. & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding, Computers & Education, 52, 147-53
40. O'Malley, C. & Fraser, D. S. (2004). Literature review in learning with tangible technologies. Technical Report 12, NESTA Futurelab.
41. Oh, S. & Jonassen, D. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95-110.
42. Pea, R.D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423-51. (Pubitemid 39057721)
43. Price, S., Sheridan, J.G., Pontual-Falcao, T. & Roussos, G. (2008). Towards a Framework for Investigating Tangible Environments for Learning. International Journal of Arts and Technology. Special Issue on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, 1(3/4), 351-68.
44. Puntambekar, S. & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1-12. (Pubitemid 40447988)
45. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science by design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185-217. (Pubitemid 40320322)
46. Quintana, C. & Fishman, B.J. (2006). Supporting science learning and teaching with software-based scaffolding. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, 7-11 April 2006, San Francisco, CA.
47. Quintana, C., Reiser, B.J., Davis, E.A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R.G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D. & Soloway, E. (2004). 'A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry', Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337-386. (Pubitemid 39057719)
48. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 13(3), 273-304. (Pubitemid 39063558)
49. Gil, J., Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan C. S. C. (2007). Intuitive moderation styles and beliefs of teachers in CSCLbased argumentation. In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds), Mice, Minds, and Society: The 2007 Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference (pp. 219-229). New Brunswick, NJ: ISLS.
50. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., Vavoula, G. (2007). A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age, in Andrews, R. & Haythornthwaite, C. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research (pp. 221-247). London: Sage.
51. Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso Press.
52. Stanton-Fraser, D. (2007). The Technical Art of Learning Science. Luckin, R., Koedinger, K., Greer, J. & Johnson, L. (Eds). Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work (pp. 5-6). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
53. Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305-35.
54. Tuckman, B. (2007). The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators' distance learning outcomes. Computers and Education, 49(2), 414-22. (Pubitemid 46777141)
55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Trans. Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
57. Waycott, J; Jones, A and Scanlon, E (2005). An activity theory framework for analyzing PDAs as lifelong learning tools. Special issue of Learning Media and Technologies (eds A Jones and E Scanlon) Vol. 30, No. 2, pp 107 - 130 (Pubitemid 41664465)
58. Wecker, C. & Fischer, F. (2007). Fading scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of distributed monitoring. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Mice, Minds, and Society: Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2007 (pp. 763-771). ISLS.
59. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: Scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! ( pp. 717-726) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge- cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 191-211). New York, NY: Springer.
61. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
62. Wood, D., Shadbolt, N., Reichgelt, H., Wood, H. & Paskiewitz, T. (1992). EXPLAIN: Experiments in planning and instruction. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour Quarterly Newsletter, 81, 13-16.
63. Wood, D., Underwood, J. & Avis, P. (1999) Integrated learning Systems in the Classroom. Computers and Education, 33 (2/3), 91-108. (Pubitemid 129620114)
64. Wood, H.A. & Wood, D. (1999) Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education, 33, 2-3, 153-69. (Pubitemid 129620117)
65. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004) Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42, (3), 289-314.
66. Zurita and Nussbaum, 2007. A conceptual framework based on activity theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology. v3812. 211-235. (Pubitemid 46325305)