Stimulus onset asynchrony and the timeline of word recognition: Event-related potentials during sentence reading

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1852-1870

  Dambacher, Michael ^a,b   Dimigen, Olaf ^b,c   Braun, Mario ^a,d   Wille, Kristin ^b   Jacobs, Arthur M ^a,d   Kliegl, Reinhold ^b  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion (DINE)   (Germany)

Author keywords

Event related potentials (ERPs); Frequency; Predictability; Sentence reading; Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA); Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; READING; STIMULUS ONSET ASYNCHRONY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84862849651     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Altmann G.T.M. The Ascent of Babel. An Exploration of Language, Mind, and Understanding 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 1999, 73(3):247-264.
3. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:502-518.
4. Altmann G.T.M., Mirkovic J. Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:583-609.
5. Ashby J., Rayner K., Clifton C. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 58(6):1065-1086.
6. Baccino T., Manunta Y. Eye-fixation-related potentials: insight into parafoveal processing. Journal of Psychophysiology 2005, 19(3):204-215.
7. Bar M. The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(7):280-289.
8. Barber H.A., Kutas M. Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews 2007, 53(1):98-123.
9. Braun M., Hutzler F., Ziegler J.C., Dambacher M., Jacobs A.M. Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30:1977-1989.
10. Braun M., Jacobs A.M., Hahne A., Ricker B., Hofmann M., Hutzler F. Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision. Brain Research 2006, 1073:431-439.
11. Brown C.M., Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5(1):34-44.
12. Brown C.M., Hagoort P., ter Keurs M. Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: open- and closed-class words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(3):261-281.
13. Burgess C., Tanenhaus M.K., Seidenberg M.S. Context and lexical access: implications of nonword interference for lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15(4):620-632.
14. Calvo M.G., Meseguer E. Eye movements and processing stages in reading: relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2002, 5(1):66-77.
15. Camblin C.C., Ledoux K., Boudewyn M., Gordon P.C., Swaab T.Y. Processing new and repeated names: effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP. Brain Research 2007, 1146:172-184.
16. Carlsson K., Petrovic P., Skare S., Petersson K.M., Ingvar M. Tickling expectations: neural processing in anticipation of a sensory stimulus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(4):691-703.
17. Churchland P.S., Ramachandran V.S., Sejnowski T.J. A critique of pure vision. Large-scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain 1994, 23-60. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. C. Koch, J.L. Davis (Eds.).
18. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3(3):201-215.
19. Dambacher, M. (2010). Bottom-up and top-down processes in reading: influences of frequency and predictability on event-related potentials and eye movements. PhD Thesis. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
20. Dambacher M., Kliegl R. Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading. Brain Research 2007, 1155:147-162.
21. Dambacher M., Kliegl R., Hofmann M., Jacobs A.M. Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research 2006, 1084:89-103. Retrieved Apr, from Article database.
22. Dambacher M., Rolfs M., Göllner K., Kliegl R., Jacobs A.M. Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input. PLoS One 2009, 4(3):e5047.
23. Deacon D., Dynowska A., Ritter W., Grose-Fifer J. Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology 2004, 41(1):60-74.
24. Deacon D., Hewitt S., Yang C.M., Nagata M. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cognitive Brain Research 2000, 9(2):137-146.
25. DeLong K.A., Urbach T.P., Kutas M. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(8):1117-1121.
26. DeLong K.A., Urbach T.P., Groppe D.M., Kutas M. Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. Psychophysiolog 2011, 48:1203-1207.
27. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21.
28. Dimigen O., Dambacher M., Sommer W., Kliegl R., Jacobs A.M., Hauk O. Early correlates of word recognition in fixation-related and event-related potentials: a comparison using simultaneous eye tracking and EEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Supplement 2011, 104-104.
29. Dimigen, O., Kliegl, R., & Sommer, W. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials. Neuroimage, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006.
30. Dimigen O., Sommer W., Hohlfeld A., Jacobs A.M., Kliegl R. Co-registration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2011, 140(4):552-572.
31. Dimigen O., Valsecchi M., Sommer W., Kliegl R. Human microsaccade-related visual brain responses. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(39):12321-12331.
32. Ditman T., Holcomb P.J., Kuperberg G.R. An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:927-935.
33. Duffy S.A., Henderson J.M., Morris R.K. Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15(5):791-801.
34. Ehrlich S.F., Rayner K. Contextual effects on word perception and eye-movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20(6):641-655.
35. Elman J.L. An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(7):301-306.
36. Engbert R., Nuthmann A., Richter E.M., Kliegl R. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review 2005, 112(4):777-813.
37. Engel A.K., Fries P., Singer W. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2(10):704-716.
38. Enns J.T., Lleras A. What's next? New evidence for prediction in human vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(9):327-333.
39. Federmeier K.D., Kutas M. A rose by any other name: long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:469-495.
40. Federmeier K.D., Wlotko E.W., De Ochoa-Dewald E., Kutas M. Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research 2007, 1146:75-84.
41. Fischler I., Bloom P.A. Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18(1):1-20.
42. Fodor J.A. The Modularity of Mind 1983, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
43. Forster K.I. Accessing the mental lexicon. New Approaches To Language Mechanisms: A Collection Of Psycholinguistic Studies 1976, 257-287. Amsterdam, North Holland. R.J. Wales, E.L. Walker (Eds.).
44. Forster K.I., Chambers S.M. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1973, 12(6):627-635.
45. Geyken A. The DWDS corpus: a reference corpus for the German language of the 20th century. Idioms and Collocations: Corpus-based Linguistic, Lexicographic Studies 2007, 23-40. Continuum Press, London. C. Fellbaum (Ed.).
46. Gilbert C.D., Sigman M. Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron 2007, 54:677-696.
47. Glucksberg S., Kreuz R.J., Rho S.H. Context can constrain lexical access: implications for models of language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1986, 12(3):323-335.
48. Grainger J., Holcomb P.J. Neural constraints on a functional architecture for word recognition. The neural basis of reading 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford. P. Cornelissen, P. Hansen, M. Kringelbach, K. Pugh (Eds.).
49. Grainger J., Holcomb P.J. Watching the word go by: on the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass 2009, 3(1):128-156.
50. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103(3):518-565.
51. Grossberg S. The link between brain learning, attention, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 1999, 8(1):1-44.
52. Gunter T.C., Jackson J.L., Mulder G. An electrophysiological study of semantic processing in young and middle-aged academics. Psychophysiology 1992, 29(1):38-54.
53. Hagoort P., Brown C., Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993, 8(4):439-483.
54. Hagoort P., Brown C.M. ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(11):1518-1530.
55. Handy T.C., Mangun G.R. Attention and spatial selection: electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62(1):175-186.
56. Hauk O., Davis M.H., Ford M., Pulvermüller F., Marslen-Wilson W.D. The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage 2006, 30(4):1383-1400.
57. Hauk O., Pulvermüller F. Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 115(5):1090-1103.
58. Heister J., Würzner K.-M., Bubenzer J., Pohl E., Hanneforth T., Geyken A., et al. dlexDB - eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung [dlexDB - a lexical data base for psychological and linguistic research]. Psychologische Rundschau 2011, 62:10-20.
59. Holcomb P.J. Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology 1993, 30(1):47-61.
60. Holcomb P.J., Neville H.J. Natural speech perception: an analysis using event-related brain potentials. Psychobiology 1991, 19(4):288-300.
61. Hutzler F., Braun M., Vo M.L.H., Engl V., Hofmann M., Dambacher M., et al. Welcome to the real world: validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings. Brain Research 2007, 1172:124-129.
62. Inhoff A.W., Rayner K. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency. Perception and Psychophysics 1986, 40(6):431-439.
63. Jacobs A.M., Carr T.H. Mind mappers and cognitive modelers: toward cross-fertilization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1995, 18(2):362-363.
64. Jacobs A.M., Rey A., Ziegler J.C., Grainger J. MROM-p: an interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition 1998, 147-188. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. J. Grainger, A.M. Jacobs (Eds.).
65. Kamide Y., Altmann G.T.M., Haywood S.L. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49(1):133-156.
66. Kamide Y., Scheepers C., Altmann G.T.M. Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32(1):37-55.
67. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 1999, 22(4):751-761.
68. Kintsch W., Mross E.F. Context effects in word identification. Journal of Memory and Language 1985, 24(3):336-349.
69. Kleiman G.M. Sentence frame contexts and lexical decisions: sentence-acceptability and word-relatedness effects. Memory and Cognition 1980, 8(4):336-344.
70. Kliegl R., Dambacher M., Dimigen O., Jacobs A.M., Sommer W. Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading. Psychological Research 2012, 76(2):145-158.
71. Kliegl R., Grabner E., Rolfs M., Engbert R. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16(1-2):262-284.
72. Kliegl R., Nuthmann A., Engbert R. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135(1):12-35.
73. Kotz S.A., Von Cramon D.Y., Friederici A.D. On the role of phonological short-term memory in sentence processing: ERP single case evidence on modality-specific effects. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22(8):931-958.
74. Kretzschmar F., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M. Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit. Neuroreport 2009, 20(18):1613-1618.
75. Kuperman V., Dambacher M., Nuthmann A., Kliegl R. The effect of word position on eye movements in sentence and paragraph reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:1838-1857.
76. Kutas M. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited during rapid serial visual presentation of congruous and incongruous sentences. Current Trends in Event-Related Potential Research, EEG Suppl. 40 1987, 406-411. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. R. Johnson, J.W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman (Eds.).
77. Kutas M. One lesson learned: frame language processing - literal and figurative - as a human brain function. Metaphor and symbol 2006, 21(4):285-325.
78. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 2011, 62(1):621-647.
79. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980, 207(4427):203-205.
80. Kutas M., King J.W. The potentials for basic sentence processing: differentiating integrative processes. Attention and Performance XVI 1996, 501-546. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. T. Inui, J.L. McClelland (Eds.).
81. Kutas M., Van Petten C. Psycholinguistics electrified: event-related brain potential investigations. Handbook of Psycholinguistics 1994, 83-143. Academic Press, San Diego. M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.).
82. Kutas M., Van Petten C., Besson M. Event-related potential asymmetries during the reading of sentences. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1988, 69:218-233.
83. Kutas M., Van Petten C., Kluender R. Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994-2005. Handbook of Psycholinguistics 2006, 659-724. Elsevier Press, New York. 2nd edn. M.A. Gernsbacher, M. Traxler (Eds.).
84. Kveraga K., Ghuman A.S., Bar M. Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition 2007, 65:145-168.
85. Lau E.F., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:920-933.
86. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21(3):451-468.
87. Lavie N. Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(2):75-82.
88. Lavie N., Tsal Y. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception and Psychophysics 1994, 56(2):183-197.
89. Ledoux K., Gordon P.C., Camblin C.C., Swaab T.Y. Coreference and lexical repetition: mechanisms of discourse integration. Memory and Cognition 2007, 35(4):801-815.
90. Lucas M.M. Frequency effects on the processing of ambiguous words in sentence contexts. Language and Speech 1987, 30:25-46.
91. Luck S.J., Woodman G.F., Vogel E.K. Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(11):432-440.
92. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88(5):375-407.
93. Mechelli A., Price C.J., Friston K.J., Ishai A. Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(11):1256-1265.
94. Miller J., Patterson T., Ulrich R. Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology 1998, 35(1):99-115.
95. Misra M., Holcomb P.J. Event-related potential indices of masked repetition priming. Psychophysiology 2003, 40(1):115-130.
96. Morton J. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 1969, 76(2):165-178.
97. Mumford D. On the computational architecture of the neocortex: II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biological Cybernetics 1992, 66(3):241-251.
98. Murray W.S., Forster K.I. Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis. Psychological Review 2004, 111(3):721-756.
99. Nieuwland M.S., Kuperberg G.R. When the truth is not too hard to handle: an event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation. Psychological Science 2008, 19(12):1213-1218.
100. Nieuwland M.S., Van Berkum J.J.A. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs. Brain Research 2006, 1118:155-167.
101. O'Connor D.H., Fukui M.M., Pinsk M.A., Kastner S. Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(11):1203-1209.
102. Onifer W., Swinney D.A. Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition 1981, 9(3):225-236.
103. Otten M., Nieuwland M.S., van Berkum J.J.A. Great expectations: specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language. BMC Neuroscience 2007, 8.
104. Otten M., Van Berkum J.J.A. Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: prediction or priming?. Discourse Processes 2008, 45(6):464-496.
105. Penolazzi B., Hauk O., Pulvermüller F. Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology 2007, 74(3):374-388.
106. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(3):105-110.
107. Pulvermüller F., Shtyrov Y., Hauk O. Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain and Language 2009, 110(2):81-94.
108. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124(3):372-422.
109. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62(8):1457-1506.
110. Rayner K., Ashby J., Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(4):720-732.
111. Rayner K., Binder K.S., Ashby J., Pollatsek A. Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research 2001, 41(7):943-954.
112. Rayner K., Clifton C. Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implications for event-related potential research. Biological Psychology 2009, 80(1):4-9.
113. Rayner K., Pollatsek A., Ashby J., Clifton C. The Psychology of Reading 2012, Psychology Press, New York.
114. Rayner K., Well A.D. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: a further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1996, 3(4):504-509.
115. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105(1):125-157.
116. Robichon F., Besson M., Habib M. An electrophysiological study of dyslexic and control adults in a sentence reading task. Biological Psychology 2002, 59(1):29-53.
117. Rossell S.L., Price C.J., Nobre A.C. The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(5):550-564.
118. Rubenstein H., Garfield L., Millikan J.A. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1970, 9(5):487-494.
119. Rugg M.D. Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory and Cognition 1990, 18(4):367-379.
120. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review 1982, 89(1):60-94.
121. Schuberth R.E., Eimas P.D. Effects of context on classification of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3(1):27-36.
122. Schvaneveldt R.W., Meyer D.E., Becker C.A. Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1976, 2(2):243-256.
123. Sereno S.C., Brewer C.C., O'Donnell P.J. Context effects in word recognition: evidence for early interactive processing. Psychological Science 2003, 14(4):328-333.
124. Sereno S.C., Rayner K., Posner M.I. Establishing a time-line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport 1998, 9(10):2195-2200.
125. Simola J., Holmqvist K., Lindgren M. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials. Brain and Language 2009, 111(2):101-113.
126. Simpson G.B. Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20(1):120-136.
127. Simpson G.B. Context and the processing of ambiguous words. Handbook of Psycholinguistics 1994, 359-374. Academic Press, San Diego. M. Gernsbacher (Ed.).
128. Somers D.C., Dale A.M., Seiffert A.E., Tootell R.B.H. Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999, 96(4):1663-1668.
129. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1983, 112(1):1-36.
130. Swaab T.Y., Camblin C.C., Gordon P.C. Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(5):715-726.
131. Swinney D.A. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18(6):645-659.
132. Tabossi P. Effects of context on the immediate interpretation of unambiguous nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14(1):153-162.
133. Taft M. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition 1979, 7(4):263-272.
134. Ullman S. Sequence seeking and counter streams: a computational model for bidirectional information flow in the visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1995, 5(1):1-11.
135. Ulrich R., Miller J. Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology 2001, 38(5):816-827.
136. Van Berkum J.J.A. Sentence comprehension in a wider discourse: can we use ERPs to keep track of things?. The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond 2004, 229-270. Psychology Press, New York. M. Carreiras, C. C. Jr (Eds.).
137. Van Berkum J.J.A., Brown C.M., Zwitserlood P., Kooijman V., Hagoort P. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31(3):443-467.
138. Van Petten C. Words and sentences: event-related brain potential measures. Psychophysiology 1995, 32(6):511-525.
139. Van Petten C., Kutas M. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition 1990, 18(4):380-393.
140. Van Petten C., Luka B.J. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2012, 83(2):176-190.
141. West R.F., Stanovich K.E. Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1982, 8(5):385-399.
142. Wicha N.Y., Bates E.A., Moreno E.M., Kutas M. Potato not pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters 2003, 346(3):165-168.
143. Wicha N.Y., Moreno E.M., Kutas M. Anticipating words and their gender: an event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(7):1272-1288.
144. Williams M.A., Baker C.I., Op de Beeck H.P., Mok Shim W., Dang S., Triantafyllou C., et al. Feedback of visual object information to foveal retinotopic cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11(12):1439-1445.