Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: A study with fixation-related brain potentials

NeuroImage

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 381-393

  Dimigen, Olaf ^a,b   Kliegl, Reinhold ^b   Sommer, Werner ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Active vision; Boundary technique; EEG; Eye tracking; Eye fixation related potentials (EFRP); Parafoveal vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EYE TRACKING; FACILITATION; FEMALE; FIXATION RELATED BRAIN POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PAAFOVEAL VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD LIST RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING; SACCADES; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 84861643490     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Altarriba J., Kambe G., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Percept. Psychophys. 2001, 63:875-891.
2. Anagnostou E., Kleiser R., Skrandies W. Electrophysiological correlates of human intrasaccadic processing. Exp. Brain Res. 2000, 130:177-187.
3. Baccino T., Manunta Y. Eye-fixation-related potentials: insight into parafoveal processing. J. Psychophysiol. 2005, 19:204-215.
4. Bach M. The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test - automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom. Vis. Sci. 1996, 73:49-53.
5. Barber H.A., Kutas M. Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Res. Rev. 2007, 53:98-123.
6. Barber H.A., Ben Zvi S., Bentin S., Kutas M. Parafoveal perception during sentence reading? An ERP paradigm using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) with flankers. Psychophysiology 2010, 48:523-531.
7. Barber H.A., Donamayor N., Kutas M. Parafoveal N400 effect during sentence reading. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 479:152-156.
8. Barber H.A., Van der Meij M., López-Perez J., Kutas M. Parafoveal ERP effects in reading: the influence of cloze probability and reading time. Poster at the 11th Conference for Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, ICON, Palma, Spain.
9. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1995, 57:289-300.
10. Bentin S., Mouchetant-Rostaing Y., Giard M.H., Echallier J.F., Pernier J. ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1999, 11:235-260.
11. Berg P., Scherg M. A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994, 90:229-241.
12. Brunia C.H.M., Möcks J., Van den Berg-Lenssen M.M.C., Coelho M., Coles M.G.H., Elbert T., et al. Correcting ocular artifacts in the EEG: a comparison of several methods. J. Psychophysiol. 1989, 3:1-50.
13. Carreiras M., Perea M., Vergara M., Pollatsek A. The time course of orthography and phonology: ERP correlates of masked priming effects in Spanish. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:1113-1122.
14. Chace K.H., Rayner K., Well A.D. Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: effects of reading skill. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2005, 59:209-217.
15. Chase R., Kalil R.E. Suppression of visual evoked responses to flashes and pattern shifts during voluntary saccades. Vision Res. 1972, 12:215-220.
16. Dimigen O., Valsecchi M., Sommer W., Kliegl R. Human microsaccade-related visual brain responses. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:12321-12331.
17. Dimigen O., Sommer W., Hohlfeld A., Jacobs A.M., Kliegl R. Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2011, 140:552-572.
18. Dufau S., Grainger J., Holcomb J. An ERP investigation of location invariance in masked repetition priming. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2008, 8:222-228.
19. Duffy F.H., Lombroso C.T. Electrophysiological evidence for visual suppression prior to the onset of a voluntary saccadic eye movement. Nature 1968, 218:1074-1075.
20. Engbert R., Mergenthaler K. Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103:7192-7197.
21. Grainger J., Kiyonaga K., Holcomb P.J. The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:1021-1026.
22. Groppe D.M., Urbach T.P., Kutas M. Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1711-1725.
23. Gross E.G., Vaughan H.G., Valenstein E. Inhibition of visual evoked responses to patterned stimuli during voluntary eye movements. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1967, 22:204-209.
24. Heister J., Würzner K.M., Bubenzer J., Pohl E., Hanneforth T., Geyken A., et al. dlexDB - eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung. Psychol. Rundsch. 2011, 62:10-20.
25. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1990, 16:417-429.
26. Henderson J.M., Dixon P., Petersen A., Twilley L.C., Ferreira F. Evidence for the use of phonological representations during transsaccadic word recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1995, 21:82-97.
27. Hoffman J.E., Subramaniam B. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept. Psychophys. 1995, 57:787-795.
28. Hohenstein S., Laubrock J., Kliegl R. Semantic preview benefit during eye movements in reading: a parafoveal fast-priming study. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2010, 36:1150-1170.
29. Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. On the time course of visual word recognition: an event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1631-1643.
30. Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials. Brain Res. 2007, 1180:39-58.
31. Hutzler F., Braun M., Vö M.L.H., Engl V., Hofmann M., Dambacher M., et al. Welcome to the real world: validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings. Brain Res. 2007, 1172:124-129.
32. Hyönä J., Häikiö T. Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading?. Scand. J. Psychol. 2005, 46:475-483.
33. Ille N., Berg P., Scherg M. Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 19:113-124.
34. Inhoff A.W., Starr M., Shindler K.L. Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2000, 62:1474-1484.
35. Ishida T., Ikeda M. Temporal properties of information extraction in reading studied by a text-mask replacement technique. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1989, 6:1624-1632.
36. Kennedy A., Pynte J., Ducrot S. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2002, 55:1307-1337.
37. Keren A.S., Yuval-Greenberg S., Deouell L.Y. Saccadic spike potentials in gamma-band EEG: characterization, detection and suppression. Neuroimage 2010, 49:2248-2263.
38. Kliegl R., Nuthmann A., Engbert R. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2006, 135:12-35.
39. Kretzschmar F., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M. Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit. Neuroreport 2009, 20:1613-1618.
40. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2011, 62:621-647.
41. Kutas M., Van Petten C.K., Kluender R. Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994-2005). Handbook of Psycholinguistics 2006, 659-724. Elsevier, New York. 2nd ed. M.A. Gernsbacher, M. Traxler (Eds.).
42. Lambert B.L., Donderi D., Senders J.W. Similarity of drug names: comparison of objective and subjective measures. Psychol. Market. 2002, 19:641-661.
43. Marton M. Saccade-related brain potentials during reading. Advances in Biological Research in Hungary (1986-1990) 1991, 66-69. Akaprint, Budapest. G. Lázár (Ed.).
44. Matin E. Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychol. Bull. 1974, 81:899-917.
45. Maurer U., Brandeis D., McCandliss B.D. Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response. Behav. Brain Funct. 2005, 1:13.
46. McConkie G.W., Rayner K. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Percept. Psychophys. 1975, 17:578-586.
47. McConkie G.W., Zola D. Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?. Percept. Psychophys. 1984, 25:221-224.
48. Michael J.A., Stark L. Electrophysiological correlates of saccadic suppression. Exp. Neurol. 1967, 17:233-246.
49. Murray M.M., Brunet D., Michel C.M. Topographic ERP analyses: a step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topogr. 2008, 20:249-264.
50. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
51. Pelli D.G., Tillmann K., Freeman J., Su M., Berger T.D., Majaj N.J. Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2)(20):1-36.
52. Pernet C., Uusvuori J., Salmelin R. Parafoveal-on-foveal and foveal word priming are different processes: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence. Neuroimage 2007, 38:321-330.
53. Pollatsek A., Lesch M., Morris R.K., Rayner K. Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1992, 18:148-162.
54. Pulvermüller F., Shtyrov Y., Hauk O. Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain Lang. 2009, 110:81-94.
55. Rayner K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cogn. Psychol. 1975, 7:65-81.
56. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20years of research. Psychol. Bull. 1998, 124:372-422.
57. Rayner K., Clifton C. Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implications for event-related potential research. Biol. Psychol. 2009, 80:4-9.
58. Rayner K., McConkie G.W., Ehrlich S. Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1978, 4:529-544.
59. Rayner K., McConkie G.W., Zola D. Integrating information across eye movements. Cogn. Psychol. 1980, 12:206-226.
60. Rayner K., Balota D.A., Pollatsek A. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Can. J. Psychol. 1986, 40:473-483.
61. Rayner K., White S.J., Kambe G., Miller B., Liversedge S.P. On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research 2003, 213-234. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam. J. Hyönä, R. Radach, H. Deubel (Eds.).
62. Rugg M.D. The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event related potentials. Psychophysiology 1985, 22:642-647.
63. Rugg M.D. Dissociation of semantic priming, word and non-word repetition effects by event-related potentials. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1987, 39:123-148.
64. Schroyens W., Vitu F., Brysbaert M., d'Ydewalle G. Visual attention and eye-movement control during reading: the case of parafoveal processing. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1999, 52A:1021-1046.
65. Sereno S.C., Rayner K. Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7:489-493.
66. Simola J., Holmqvist K., Lindgren M. Hemispheric differences in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation related potentials. Brain Lang. 2009, 111:101-113.
67. Skrandies W., Laschke K. Topography of visually evoked brain activity during eye movements: lambda waves, saccadic suppression, and discrimination performance. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1997, 27:15-27.
68. Slattery T.J., Angele B., Rayner K. Eye movements and display change detection during reading. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2011, 37:1924-1938.
69. White S.J., Rayner K., Liversedge S.P. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: a reexamination. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2005, 12:891-896.
70. White S.J., Bertram R., Hyönä J. Semantic processing of previews within compound words. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2008, 34:988-993.
71. Yan M., Richter E.M., Shu H., Kliegl R. Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2009, 16:561-566.