Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences

Psychophysiology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 99-115

  Miller, Jeff ^a   Patterson, Tui ^a   Ulrich, Rolf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Computer simulations; Jackknifing; Lateralized readiness potential; Onset latency measurement

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LATENT PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0031973857     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0048577298000857     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
2. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988) The use of partial information in response processing: A psychophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
3. Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52-64.
4. Efron, B. (1981). Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other methods. Biometrika, 68, 589-599.
5. Gehring, W. J., Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 198-216.
6. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
7. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics, New York: Wiley.
8. Jackson, P. R. (1986). Robust methods in statistics. In A. D. Lovie (Ed.), New developments in statistics for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 22-43). New York: British Psychological Society and Methuen.
9. Meyer, D. E., Osman, A. M., Irwin, D. E., & Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology, 26, 3-67.
10. Miller, J. O., Coles, M. G. H., & Chakraborty, S. (1996). Dissociation between behavioral and psychophysiological measures of response preparation. Acta Psychologica, 94, 189-208.
11. Miller, J. O., & Pachella, R. G. (1973). Locus of the stimulus probability effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 227-231.
12. Miller, J. O., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Manuscript in preparation.
13. Miller, J. O., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (1997). Effects of stimulus intensity on the laleralized readiness potential. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Miller, R. G. (1974). The jackknife - A review. Biometrika, 61, 1-15.
15. Mocks, J., Kohler, W., Gasser, T., & Tuan, P. D. (1988). Novel approaches to the problem of latency jitter. Psychophysiology, 25, 217-226.
16. Mosteller, F. & Tukey, J. (1977). Data analysis and regression Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Osman, A. M., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
18. Osman, A. M., & Moore, C. M. (1993) The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292-1312.
19. Pfurtscheller, G., & Aranibar, A. (1977). Event-related cortical desynchronization detected by power measurements of scalp EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 2, 817-826.
20. Smid, H. G. O. M., Böcker, K. B. E., van Touw, D. A., Mulder, G., & Brunia, C. H. M. (1996). A psychophysiological investigation of the selection and the use of partial stimulus information in response choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 3-24.
21. Smid, H. G. O. M., Lamain, W., Hogeboom, M. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1991). Psychophysiological evidence for continuous information transmission between visual search and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 696-714.
22. Smulders, F. T. Y. Kenemans, J. L., & Kok, A (1996). Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method. Psychophysiology, 33, 194-205.
23. Ter Braak, C. J. F. (1992). Permutation versus bootstrap significance tests in multiple regression and ANOVA. In K. H. Jockel, G. Rothe, & W. Sendler (Eds.), Bootstrapping and related resampling techniques (pp. 79-86). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
24. Toothaker, L. E. (1991). Multiple comparisons for researchers, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Van Dellen, H. J., Brookhuis, K. A., Mulder, G., Okita, T., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1985). Evoked potential correlates of practice in a visual search task. In D. Papakostopoulos, S. Butler, & I. Martin (Eds.), Clinical and experimental neuropsychophysiology (pp. 132-155). Beckenham, England: Croom Helm.
26. Verleger, R., & Wascher, E. (1995). Fitting ex-Gauss functions to P3 wave-shapes: An attempt at distinguishing between real and apparent changes of P3 latency. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 146-158.