Distributional analyses in auditory lexical decision: Neighborhood density and word-frequency effects

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 882-887

  Goh, Winston D ^a   Lidia, Suárez ^a   Yap, Melvin J ^a   Hui Tan, Seok ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 74849107346     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.882     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Andrews, S., & Heathcote, A. (2001). Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: A matter of some moment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 514-544.
2. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 340-357.
3. Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 32-55.
4. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 59, 495-523.
5. Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 501-518.
6. Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340-347.
7. Jiang, Y., Rouder, J. N., & Speckman, P. L. (2004). A note on the sampling properties of the Vincentizing (quantile averaging) procedure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48, 186-195.
8. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, 1-36.
9. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-86.
10. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299-325.
11. Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 non-words: The ARC Nonword Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1339-1362.
12. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburg: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
13. Vincent, S. B. (1912). The function of vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavioral Monographs, 1(Whole No. 5).
14. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 374-408.
15. Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 779-793.