Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in finnish and Austrian classrooms

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 241-267

  Dalton Puffer, Christiane ^a   Nikula, Tarja ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745630635     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: 1477450X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/aml007     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and B. Hartford. 1993. 'Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18:171-188.
2. Bernstein, B. 1990. Class, Codes and Control. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourase. Vol 4: London, New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3. Block, D. 2003. The Social Turn in Second Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4. BIum-Kulka, S. 1982. 'Learning to say what you mean in a second language: A study of the speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language,' Applied Linguistics 3: 29-59.
5. BIum-Kulka, S. 1991. 'Interlanguage pragmatics: The case of requests' in R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, M. Sharwood Smith, and M. Swain (eds): Foreign/second Language Pedagogy Research. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 255-72.
6. Blum-Kulka, S., J. House, and G. Kasper. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
7. Brinton, D., M. A. Snow, and M. B. Wesche. 1989. Content-based Second Language Instruction. New York: Newbury House.
8. Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Christie, F. 2000. The language of classroom interaction and learning' in L. Unsworth (ed.): Researching Language in Schools and Communities. Functional Linguistics Perspectives. London and Washington: Cassell, pp. 184-205.
10. CLIL/EMILE-the European Dimension. Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential 2002. European Commission Report, Public Services Contract DG EAC 36 01 Lot 3.
11. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2005. Immersion Classrooms as Language Learning Environments: Applied Linguistic Perspectives. Postdoctoral Thesis. University of Vienna.
12. Donate, R. and D. McCormick. 1994. 'A socioculturel perspective on language learning strategies: the role of mediation,' Modern Language Journal 78: 453-64.
13. Edwards, A. P. and D. P. G. Westgate. 1994. Investigating Classroom Talk. 2nd edn. London and Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
14. Ehlich, K. and J. Rehbein. 1986. Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.
15. Ellis, R. 1992. 'Learning to communicate in the classroom: A study of two learners' requests,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14:1-23.
16. Ernst, G. 1994. Talking circle: conversation and negotiation in the ESL classroom,' Tesol Quartely 28: 293-322.
17. Faerch, C. and G. Kasper. 1989. 'Internal and external modification in. interlanguage request realization' in S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds): Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex. pp. 221-47.
18. Firth A. and J. Wagner. 1997. 'On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research,' Modern Language Journal 81: 285-300.
19. Gass, S. M., A. Mackey, and T. Pica. 1998. The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition, Introduction to the Special Issue,' Modern Language Journal 82: 299-307.
20. Genesee, F. 1987. Learning Through Two Languages: Studies of Immersion and Bilingual Education. New York, NJ: Harper & Row.
21. Griffin, P. and H. Mehan. 1981. 'Sense and ritual in classroom discourse' in F. Coulmas (ed.): Conversational Routine. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 187-213.
22. Hakulinen, A. 1987. 'Avoiding personal reference in. Finnish' in J, Verschueren and M. BertucelliPapi (eds): The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 141-53.
23. Hall, J. K. and L. S. Verplaetse (eds) 2000. Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Arnold.
25. He, A. W. 2000. 'The grammatical and interactional organization of teacher's directives: implications for socialization of Chinese American children,' Linguistics and Education 11: 119-40.
26. Huibregtse, I. 2001. Effecten en didaktiek van tweetalig voortgezet onderwijs in Nederland. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Utrecht.
27. Hyland, K. 2002. 'Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing,' Applied Linguistics 23: 215-39.
28. Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: an Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29. Iedema, R. 1996. 'Save the talk for after the listening: The realisation of regulative discourse in teacher talk,' Language and Education 10: 82-103.
30. Jäppinen, A.-K. 2003. Ajattelu ja sisältöjen oppiminen vieraskielisessä opetuksessa. Tukimusraportti 2/3. (Thinking and Content Learning in Bilingual Education. Research Report 2/3'). Jyväskylä: The Centre for Applied Language Studies.
31. Kääntä, L. 2004. 'No need necessarily to show offl' Directives as Situated Activity in L2 Classroom Interaction. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Jyväskylä, Department of Languages/English.
32. Kasper, G. 2001. 'Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics' in Rose and G. Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-60.
33. Kasper, G. and S. Blum-Kulka (eds) 1993. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Kasper, G. 1997. '"A" stands for acquisition. A response to Firth and Wagner,' Modern Language Journal 81: 307-12.
35. Lantolf, J. (ed.) 2000, Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science, Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
37. Long, M. 1997. 'Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner,' Modern Language Journal 81: 318-23.
38. Luukka, M-R. and R. Markkanen. 1997. 'Impersonalization as a form of hedging' in R. Markkanen and H. Schröder (eds): Hedging and Discourse; Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 168-87.
39. Manke, M. P. 1997. Classroom Power Relations. Understanding Student-Teacher Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Markee, N. and G. Kasper. 2004. 'Classroom talks. Introduction to MLJ Special Issue,' Modern language Journal 88: 491-500.
41. Meier, A. J. 1995. 'Passages of politeness,' Journal of Pragmatics 24: 381-92.
42. Mey, J. 2001. Pragmatics. An Introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwells.
43. Mori, J. 2002. 'Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom,' Applied Linguistics 23: 323-47.
44. Nikula, T. 2002. 'Teacher talk reflecting pragmatic awareness: A look at BFL and content-based classroom settings,' Pragmatics 12: 447-467.
45. Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Sinclair, J. and M. Coulthard. 1975. 'Towards an Analysis of Spoken Discourse: The English used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Snow, M. A. and D. M. Brinton (eds) 1997. The Content-Based Classroom. Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content. White Plains: Addison Wesley Longman.
48. Snow, M., M. Met, and F. Genesee. 1989. 'A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction,' TESOL Quarterly 23: 201-17.
49. Swain, M. 1995. "Three functions of output in second language learning' in G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (eds): Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125-44.
50. Swain, M. 1997. 'The output hypothesis, focus on form and second language learning' in V. Berry, B. Adamson, and W. Littlewood (eds): Applying Linguistics; Insights into Language in Education. Hong Kong: English Centre, University of Hong Kong, pp. 1-21.
51. Sylvén, L. K. 2004. Teaching English or English Teaching? On the Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Swedish Learners' Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. Ph.D. Dissertation. Göteborg University.
52. Tapper, J. 1994. 'Directives used in college laboratory oral discourse,' English for Specific Purposes 13: 205-22.
53. Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk. Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Harlow: Longman & Pearson Education.