Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review

Aphasiology

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 709-728

  Bislick, Lauren P ^a   Weir, Phillip C ^a   Spencer, Kristie ^a   Kendall, Diane ^a,b   Yorkston, Kathryn M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Motor Learning; PML; Speech Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

APRAXIA; DYSARTHRIA; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; LIMB MOVEMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PARKINSON DISEASE; REVIEW; SKILL; SPEECH; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH REHABILITATION;

EID: 84861512626     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2012.676888     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Adams, S. G. and Page, A. D. 2000. Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8(4): 215-220.
2. Adams, S. G., Page, A. D. and Jog, M. 2002. Summary feedback schedules and speech motor learning in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 10(4): 215-220.
3. Baddeley, A. D. and Longman, D. J. A. 1978. Influence of length and frequency of training session on rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21(8): 627-635. doi:10.1080/00140137808931764
4. Ballard, K. J. 2001. Response generalization in apraxia of speech treatments: Taking another look. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34(1-2): 3-20. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00038-1
5. Ballard, K. J., Granier, J. P. and Robin, D. A. 2000. Understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: Theory, analysis, and treatment. Aphasiology, 14(10): 969-995. doi:10.1080/02687030050156575
6. Ballard, K. J., Maas, E. and Robin, D. A. 2007. Treating control of voicing in apraxia of speech with variable practice. Aphasiology, 21(12): 1195-1217. doi:10.1080/02687030601047858
7. Beeson, P. M. and Robey, R. R. 2006. Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16(4): 161-169. doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7
8. Burns, M. I. and Miller, R.M. 2011. The effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the treatment of pharyngeal dysphagia: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Speech Pathology, 19(1): 13-24.
9. Clark, H. M. and Robin, D. A. 1998. Generalised motor programme and parameterisation accuracy in apraxia of speech and conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(7-8): 699-713. doi:10.1080/02687039808249567
10. Croce, R., Horvat, M. and Roswal, G. 1996. Augmented feedback for enhanced skill acquisition in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82(2): 507-514. doi:10.2466/pms.1996.82.2.507
11. Dick, M. B., Hsieh, S., Dick-Muehlke, C., Davis, D. S. and Cotman, C. W. 2000. The variability of practice hypothesis in motor learning: Does it apply to Alzheimer's disease?. Brain & Cognition, 44(3): 470-489. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1206
12. Duffy, J. R. 2005. Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management, St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
13. Hemayattalab, R. and Rostami, L. R. 2010. Effects of frequency of feedback on the learning of motor skill in individuals with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(1): 212-217. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2009.09.002
14. Hula, S. N. A., Robin, D. A., Maas, E., Ballard, K. J. and Schmidt, R. A. 2008. Effects of feedback frequency and timing on acquisition, retention, and transfer of speech skills in acquired apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 51(5): 1088-1113. doi:10.1044/1058-0360 (2008/025)
15. Jonsdottir, J., Cattaneo, D., Recalcati, M., Regola, A., Rabuffetti, M., Ferrarin, M. and al, et. 2010. Task-oriented biofeedback to improve gait in individuals with chronic stroke: Motor learning approach. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24(5): 478-485. doi:10.1177/1545968309355986
16. Katz, W. F., McNeil, M. R. and Garst, D. M. 2010. Treating apraxia of speech (AOS) with EMA-supplied visual augmented feedback. Aphasiology, 24(6-8): 826-837. doi:10.1080/02687030903518176
17. Keele, S. W. 1968. Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychology Bulletin, 70: 387-403. doi:10.1037/h0026739
18. Knock, T. R., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A. and Schmidt, R. A. 2000. Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14(5-6): 653-668. doi:10.1080/026870300401379
19. Kucera, H. and Francis, W. N. 1967. Computational analysis of present-day American English, Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
20. Maas, E., Barlow, J., Robin, D. and Shapiro, L. 2002. Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity. Aphasiology, 16(4-6): 609-622. doi:10.1080/02687030244000266
21. Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Hula, S. N. A., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J. and al, et. 2008. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3): 277-298. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025)
22. Nicholson, D. E. and Schmidt, R. A. Scheduling information feedback to enhance training effectiveness. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA. pp.1400-1403. Human Factors Society.
23. Onla-or, S. and Winstein, C. J. 2008. Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(4): 385-395. doi:10.1177/1545968307313508
24. Park, J. H. and Shea, C. H. 2003. Effect of practice on effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(1): 33-40. doi:10.1080/00222890309602119
25. Park, J. H. and Shea, C. H. 2005. Sequence learning: Response structure and effector transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58(3): 387-419. doi:10.1080/02724980343000918
26. Rice, M. S., Fertig, P. A., Maitra, K. K. and Miller, B. K. 2008. Reduced feedback: Motor learning strategy in persons with Alzheimer's disease. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 27(2): 122-138. doi:10.1080/02703180802237715
27. Salkind, J. N. 2010. Encyclopedia of research design, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Schmidt, R. A. 1975. Schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4): 225-260. doi:10.1037/h0076770
29. Schmidt, R. A. 1988. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
30. Schmidt, R. A. 2003. Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(4): 366-375.
31. Schmidt, R. A. and Lee, T. D. 2005. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
32. Schneider, S. L. and Frens, R. A. 2005. Training four-syllable CV patterns in individuals with acquired apraxia of speech: Theoretical implications. Aphasiology, 19(3-5): 451-471. doi:10.1080/02687030444000886
33. Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Black, C. and Park, J. H. 2000. Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Human Movement Science, 19(5): 737-760.
34. Spencer, K. A. and Rogers, M. A. 2005. Speech motor programming in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. Brain and Language, 94(3): 347-366. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.008
35. Steinhauer, K. and Grayhack, J. P. 2000. The role of knowledge of results in performance and learning of a voice motor task. Journal of Voice, 14(2): 137-145. doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(00)80020-X
36. Storkel, H. L. 2001. Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(6): 1321-1337. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/103)
37. Vander Linden, D. W., Cauraugh, J. H. and Greene, T. A. 1993. The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled participants. Physical Therapy, 73: 79-87.
38. Wambaugh, J. L., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Rogers, M. A. (2006). Treatment guidelines for acquired apraxia of speech: A synthesis and evaluation of the evidence. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 14(2), xv-xxxiii. http://find.galegroup.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu.
39. Weeks, D. L. and Kordus, R. N. 1998. Relative frequency of knowledge of performance and motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69: 224-230.
40. Weinberg, J. M. and Kleinman, K. P. 2003. Good study design and analysis plans as features of ethical research with humans. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 25(5): 11-14. doi:10.2307/3564600
41. Winstein, C. J. and Schmidt, R. A. 1990. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16: 677-691. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.677
42. Wright, D. L., Black, C. B., Immink, M. A., Brueckner, S. and Magnuson, C. 2004. Long-term motor programming improvements occur via concatenation of movement sequences during random but not during blocked practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(1): 39-50. doi:10.3200/JMBR.36.1.39-50
43. Wulf, G. and Schmidt, R. A. 1997. Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 23(4): 987-1006. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.23.4.987