The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course

Computers and Composition

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 217-235

  Tuzi, Frank ^a  

^a MTS Technologies   (United States)

Author keywords

E feedback; Electronic response; Peer feedback; Revision; Second language (L2) writing; Teacher feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442680463     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berg E. Catherine. The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality Journal of Second Language Writing 8 3 1999 215-241
2. Berger Virginia. The effects of peer and self-feedback CATESOL Journal 3 1990 21-35
3. Bloom, Benjamin S. (1950). Problem solving processes of college students: An exploratory investigation [Supplemental educational monographs]. The Elementary School Journal, 73.
4. Braine George. Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes Computers and Composition 14 1997 45-58
5. Carson Joan G. Nelson Gayle L. Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction Journal of Second Language Writing 5 1 1996 1-19
6. Connor Ulla Asenavage Karen. Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing 3 3 1994 257-276
7. Curtis, Anne. (1997, November). Is it better to give than receive: Feedback in student writing. Paper presented at the World Skills: Language and Living Conference, Victoria, British Columbia.
8. DiGiovanni Elaine Nagaswami Girija. Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face? ELT Journal 55 3 2001 263-272
9. Ferris, Dana, & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Hall Chris. Managing the complexity of revising across languages TESOL Quarterly 241 1990 43-60
11. Hedgecock John Lefkowitz Natalie. Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction Journal of Second Language Writing 1 2 1992 255-276
12. Hewett Beth. Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision Computers and Composition 17 2000 265-288
13. Leki Iona. Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes CATESOL Journal 3 1990 5-19
14. MacLeod Laura. Computer-aided peer review of writing Business Communications Quarterly 62 3 1999 87-94
15. Mangelsdorf Kate Schlumberger Ann. ESL student response stances in a peer - review task Journal of Second Language Writing 13 1992 235-254
16. Mendonça Cássia O. Johnson Karen E. Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction TESOL Quarterly 28 4 1994 745-769
17. Mittan, Robert. (1989). The peer review process: Harnessing students' communicative power. In Donna M. Johnson & Duane H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 207-219). New York: Longman.
18. Nelson Gayle L. Carson Joan G. ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups Journal of Second Language Writing 7 2 1998 113-131
19. Palmquist Michael. Network-supported interaction in two writing classrooms Computers and Composition 10 4 1993 25-57
20. Paulus Trena M. The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing Journal of Second Language Writing 8 3 1999 265-289
21. Stanley Jane. Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators Journal of Second Language Writing 1 3 1992 217-233
22. Sullivan Dave Brown Carol E. Nielson Norma L. Computer-mediated peer review of student papers Journal of Education for Business 74 2 1998 117-121
23. Tannacito, Terry. (1999). Electronic peer response groups: Case studies of computer mediated communication in a composition class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
24. Tsui Amy B. Ng Maria. Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing 9 2 2000 141-170
25. Van der Geest Thea Remmers Tim. The computer as a means of communication for peer review groups Computers and Composition 11 1994 237-250
26. Villamil Olga S. DeGuerrero Maria C. Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior Journal of Second Language Writing 5 l 1996 51-75
27. Warschauer Mark. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice Modern Language Journal 81 3 1997 470-481
28. Zhang Shuqiang. Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class Journal of Second Language Writing 43 1995 209-222
29. Zhang Shuqiang. Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback Journal of Second Language Writing 83 1999 321-326