How effective is information provision in shaping food safety related purchasing decisions? Evidence from a choice experiment in Lebanon

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 81-92

  Chalak, Ali ^a   Abiad, Mohamad ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Consumer preferences; Food safety certification; Information provision; Mixed logit; Purchasing behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860224915     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Ajzen I., Brown T.C., Rosenthal L.H. Information bias in contingent valuation: Effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1996, 30(1):43-57.
2. Alfnes F., Rickertsen K. Extrapolating experimental-auction results using a stated choice survey. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2007, 34(3):345-363.
3. Altekruse S.F., Street D.A., Fein S.B., Levy A.S. Consumer knowledge of foodborne microbial hazards and food-handling practices. Journal of Food Protection 1996, 59(3):287-294.
4. Angulo A.M., Gil J.M. Risk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18(8):1106-1117.
5. Balcombe K., Bailey A., Chalak A., Fraser I. Bayesian estimation of willingness-to-pay where respondents mis-report their preferences. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2007, 69(3):413-437.
6. Balcombe K., Bailey A., Chalak A., Fraser I. Modifying willingness to pay estimates where respondents mis-report their preferences. Applied Economics Letters 2008, 15(5):327-330.
7. Balcombe K., Chalak A., Fraser I. Model selection for the mixed logit with Bayesian estimation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2009, 57(2):226-237.
8. Barry T., Howard D. A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising 1990, 9(2):121-135.
9. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., et al. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual 2002, Edward Elgar, Chethenam, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.
10. Bergstrom J.C., Stoll J.R., Randall A. The impact of information on environmental commodity valuation decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1990, 72(3):614-621.
11. Blackburn M., Harrison G.W., Rutstrom E.E. Statistical bias functions and informative hypothetical surveys. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1994, 76(5):1084-1088.
12. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 2002, 23(4):421-446.
13. Brewer M.S., Sprouls G.K., Russon C. Consumer attitudes toward food safety issues. Journal of Food Safety 1994, 14(1):63-76. 10.1111/j.1745-4565.1994.tb00584.x.
14. Burton M., Rigby D., Young T., James S. Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2001, 28(4):479-498.
15. Carlsson F., Frykblom P., Lagerkvist C.J. Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments. Economics Letters 2005, 89(2):147-152.
16. Carlsson F., Martinsson P. Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2001, 41(2):179-192.
17. Chalak A., Balcombe K., Bailey A., Fraser I. Pesticides, preference heterogeneity and environmental taxes. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008, 59(3):537-554.
18. Champ P.A., Bishop R.C. Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias. Environmental and Resource Economics 2001, 19(4):383-402.
19. Cummings R.G., Taylor L.O. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. American Economic Review 1999, 89(3):649-665.
20. Enneking U. Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: The case of the Q&S label. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2004, 31(2):205-223.
21. Fawzi M., Shama M. Food safety knowledge and practices among women working in Alexandria University, Egypt. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association 2009, 84(1-2):95.
22. Ferrini S., Scarpa R. Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2007, 53(3):342-363.
23. Foster V., Mourato S. Valuing the multiple impacts of pesticide use in the UK: A contingent ranking approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2000, 51(1):1-21.
24. Frewer L., Lassen J., Kettlitz B., Scholderer J., Beekman V., Berdal K.G. Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2004, 42(7):1181-1193.
25. Green C., Tunstall S. A psychological perspective. Valuing environmental preferences: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries 1999, 207-257. Oxford University Press, Oxford. I.J. Bateman, K.G. Willis (Eds.).
26. Greene W.H. Econometric analysis 2003, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 5th ed.
27. Hanley N., Mourato S., Wright R.E. Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation?. Journal of Economic Surveys 2001, 15(3):435-462.
28. Harakeh S., Yassine H., Gharios M., Barbour E., Hajjar S., El-Fadel M., et al. Isolation, molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from meat-based fast food in Lebanon. Science of the Total Environment 2005, 341(1-3):33-44.
29. Hensher D.A. Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2010, 44(6):735-752.
30. Hensher D.A., Greene W.H. The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation 2003, 30(2):133-176.
31. Henson S. Consumer willingness to pay for reductions in the risk of food poisoning in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996, 47(3):403-420.
32. Hu W.Y., Hunnemeyer A., Veeman M., Adamowicz W., Srivastava L. Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2004, 31(3):389-408.
33. ISO (2011). International Organization for Standardization - Discover ISO. <> Retrieved 10.08.11. http://www.iso.org/iso/about/discover-iso_what-standards-do.htm.
34. Jaeger S.R. Non-sensory factors in sensory science research. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17(1-2):132-144.
35. James S., Burton M. Consumer preferences for GM food and other attributes of the food system. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2003, 47(4):501-518.
36. Johannesson M., Blomquist G.C., Blumenschein K., Johansson P.O., Liljas B., O'Conor R.M. Calibrating hypothetical willingness to pay responses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1999, 18(1):21-32.
37. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1992, 22(1):57-70.
38. Knabel S. Foodborne illness: Role of home food handling practices. Food Technology 1995, 49(4):119-133.
39. Lavidge R.J., Steiner G.A. A model of predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing 1961, 25:59-62.
40. Leggett C.G., Kleckner N.S., Boyle K.J., Duffield J.W., Mitchell R.C. Social desirability bias in contingent valuation surveys administered through in-person interviews. Land Economics 2003, 79(4):561-575.
41. List J.A., Gallet C.A. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?. Environmental and Resource Economics 2001, 20(3):241-254.
42. Loureiro M.L., Lotade J. Interviewer effects on the valuation of goods with ethical and environmental attributes. Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 30(1):49-72.
43. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. Lusk J.L., Schroeder T.C. Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2004, 86(2):467-482.
45. Macfarlane R. Integrating the consumer interest in food safety: The role of science and other factors. Food Policy 2002, 27(1):65-80.
46. Medeiros L., Hillers V., Kendall P., Mason A. Evaluation of food safety education for consumers. Journal of Nutrition Education 2001, 33:S27-S34.
47. Meer R.R., Misner S.L. Food safety knowledge and behavior of expanded food and nutrition education program participants in Arizona. Journal of Food Protection 2000, 63(12):1725-1731.
48. Miles, S. (2003). Public perception of food safety. In IAAS (Ed.), Food Quality: A challenge for North and South (pp. 171-180). Belgium.
49. Miles S., Brennan M., Kuznesof S., Ness M., Ritson C., Frewer L.J. Public worry about specific food safety issues. British Food Journal 2004, 106(1):9-22.
50. Miles S., Frewer L.J. Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12(1):47-61.
51. Mitchell R.C., Carson R. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method 1989, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
52. Mourato S., Ozdemiroglu E., Foster V. Evaluating health and environmental impacts of pesticide use: Implications for the design of ecolabels and pesticide taxes. Environmental Science and Technology 2000, 34(8):1456-1461.
53. Munro A., Hanley N. Information, uncertainty, and contingent valuation. Valuing environmental preferences: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries 1999, 258-279. Oxford University Press, Oxford. I.J. Bateman, K.G. Willis (Eds.).
54. Murphy J.J., Allen P.G., Stevens T.H., Weatherhead D. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 30(3):313-325.
55. Notermans S., Gallhoff G., Zwietering M.H., Mead G.C. Identification of critical control points in the HACCP system with a quantitative effect on the safety of food-products. Food Microbiology 1995, 12(2):93-98.
56. Osaili T.M., Obeidat B.A., Abu Jamous D.O., Bawadi H.A. Food safety knowledge and practices among college female students in north of Jordan. Food Control 2011, 22(2):269-276.
57. özdemir S., Johnson F.R., Hauber A.B. Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care. Journal of Health Economics 2009, 28(4):894-901.
58. Pennings J.M.E., Wansink B., Meulenberg M.T.G. A note on modeling consumer reactions to a crisis: The case of the mad cow disease. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2002, 19(1):91-100.
59. Ready R.C., Champ P.A., Lawton J.L. Using respondent uncertainty to mitigate hypothetical bias in a stated choice experiment. Land Economics 2010, 86(2):363-381.
60. Redmond E.C., Griffith C.J. Consumer perceptions of food safety risk, control and responsibility. Appetite 2004, 43(3):309-313.
61. Rigby D., Burton M. Preference heterogeneity and GM food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2005, 32(2):269-288.
62. Rimal A., Fletcher S.M., McWatters K.H., Misra S.K., Deodhar S. Perception of food safety and changes in food consumption habits: A consumer analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2001, 25(1):43-52. 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2001.00162.x.
63. Röhr A., Lüddecke K., Drusch S., Müller M.J., von Alvensleben R. Food quality and safety--Consumer perception and public health concern. [Proceedings Paper]. Food Control 2005, 16(8):649-655. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.06.001.
64. Rosati S., Saba A. The perception of risks associated with food-related hazards and the perceived reliability of sources of information. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2004, 39(5):491-500. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00808.x.
65. Samples K.C., Dixon J.A., Gowen M.M. Information disclosure and endangered species valuation. Land Economics 1986, 62(3):306-312.
66. ServSafe (2010). ServSafe Training and Certification. <> Retrieved 10.08.11. http://www.servsafe.com/foodsafety/.
67. Sharif L., Al-Malki T. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Taif University students on food poisoning. Food Control 2010, 21(1):55-60.
68. Smith D., Riethmuller P. Consumer concerns about food safety in Australia and Japan. British Food Journal 2000, 102(11):838-855.
69. Sperber W.H. Future developments in food safety and HACCP. Food Control 1998, 9(2-3):129-130.
70. Swait J. A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 1994, 1(2):77-89.
71. Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
72. Train K., Sonnier G. Mixed logit with bounded distributions of correlated partworths. Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics 2005, 117-134. Springer, Dordrecht. R. Scarpa, A. Alberini (Eds.).
73. Travisi C.M., Nijkamp P. Willingness to pay for agricultural environmental safety: Evidence from a survey of Milan, Italy, residents 2004, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milano.
74. Verbeke W., Scholderer J., Frewer L. Consumer perception of safety in the agri-food chain. Safety in the agri-food chain 2006, 619-646. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. P.A. Luning, F. Devlieghere, R. Verhé (Eds.).
75. Volinskiy D., Adamowicz W., Veeman M. Predicting versus testing: A conditional cross-forecasting accuracy measure for hypothetical bias. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2011, 55(3):429-450.
76. WHO (2011). World Health Organization (2010). Food Safety. <> Retrieved 10.08.11. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/en/.
77. Wierenga B. Model and measurement methodology for the analysis of consumer choice of food products. Journal of Food Quality 1983, 6(2):119-137. 10.1111/j.1745-4557.1983.tb00761.x.
78. Wilcock A., Pun M., Khanona J., Aung M. Consumer attitudes, knowledge and behaviour: A review of food safety issues. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2004, 15(2):56-66. 10.1016/j.tifs.2003.08.004.
79. Woodburn M.J., Raab C.A. Household food preparers' food-safety knowledge and practices following widely publicized outbreaks of foodborne illness. Journal of Food Protection 1997, 60(9):1105-1109.
80. Worsfold D., Griffith C. A generic model for evaluating consumer food safety behaviour. Food Control 1995, 6(6):357-363.