What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 241-254

  List, John A ^a   Gallet, Craig A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CVM; Hypothetical bias; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; RESOURCE VALUATION;

EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; THEORETICAL STUDY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0035662739     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012791822804     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Measuring values of extramarket Goods: Are indirect measures biased?
2. Assessing the validity of contingent valuations: Three field experiments
3. The contingent valuation method
4. Contingent valuation of environmental assets: Comparisons with a simulated market
5. Statistical bias functions and informative hypothetical surveys
6. Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment
7. An experimental examination of intrinsic values as a source of the WTA-WTP disparity
8. Measuring the value of a public good: An empirical comparison of elicitation procedures
9. Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good?
10. The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value
11. Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive Compatible?
12. Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible?
13. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?
14. Market transactions and hypothetical demand data: A comparative study
15. Gasoline demand revisited: An international meta-analysis of elasticities
16. Real and hypothetical willingness to pay for environmental preservation: A non-experimental comparison
17. CVM-X: Calibrating contingent values with experimental auction markets
18. Hypothetical question modes and real willingness to pay
19. Willingness to pay and the choice of question format: Experimental results
20. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon
21. Hypothetical and real consequences in experimental auctions for insurance against low probability risks
22. Environmental regulations and new plant location decisions: Evidence from a meta-analysis
23. An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions
24. Accuracy in valuation is a matter of degree
25. Reliability and predictive validity of contingent values: Does the nature of the good matter?
26. Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitaion procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards
27. Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment
28. The deadweight Loss of christmas: Comment
29. Calibration of willingness-to-accept
30. Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: Results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay
31. Evaluating the validity of the dichotomous choice question format in contingent valuation
32. Insurance for low-probability hazards: A biomodal response to unlikely events
33. Willingness to pay for preservation of species - An experiment with actual payments
34. Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments
35. Natural resource damage assessment: Proposed rules
36. Natural resource damage assessment: Final rules
37. Calibration of CV responses: Discussion
38. Willingness to pay for environmental goods in norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment
39. Empirical tests of hypothetical biases in consumers' surplus surveys
40. Buying time: Real and hypothetical offers
41. Valuting water quality monitoring: A contingent valuation experiment involving hypothetical and real payments