Valuing the multiple impacts of pesticide use in the UK: A contingent ranking approach

Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-21

  Foster, Vivien ^a,c,d   Mourato, Susana ^b,c,d  

^a Oxford Economic Research Associates   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; HEALTH IMPACT; METHODOLOGY; PESTICIDE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

AVES;

EID: 0034052058     PISSN: 0021857X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01206.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J. and Williams, M. (1994). Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271-292.
2. Beggs, S., Cardell, S. and Hausman, J. (1981). Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars, Journal of Econometrics, 16, 1-19.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., Morikawa, T. and Shiroishi, F. (1991). Analysis of the Reliability of Preference Ranking Data, Journal of Business Research, 23, 253-268.
5. Boyle, K. J., Welsh, M. P., and Bishop, R. C. (1993). The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent Valuation Studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25(1), 80-99.
6. Boyle, K. J., Desvousges, W. H. , Johnson, F. R. , Dunford, R. W. and Hudson, S. P. (1994). An Investigation of Part-Whole Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(1), 64-83.
7. Eom, Y. S. (1994). Pesticide Residue Risk and Food Safety Valuation: A Random Utility Approach, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 760-771.
8. Eom, Y. S. and Smith, V. K. (1994). Calibrated Non-Market Valuation. Discussion Paper 94-21, Resources for the Future, Washington DC, USA.
9. Foster, V., Bateman I. J. and Harley, D. (1997). A Non-Experimental Comparison of Real and Hypothetical Willingness to Pay, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48(2), 123-138.
10. Foster, V. and Mourato, S. (1997). Behavioural Consistency, Statistical Specification and Validity in the Contingent Ranking Method: Evidence from a Survey of the Impacts of Pesticide Use in the UK. Working Paper GEC 97-09, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University College London, and University of East Anglia, UK.
11. Fredman, P. (1995). Endangered Species: Benefit Estimation and Policy Implications. Report No. 109, Department of Forestry Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea, Sweden.
12. Hanley, N., MacMillan, D., Wright, R., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parsisson, D. and Crabtree, B. (1998). Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 1-15.
13. Hanley, N., Wright, R. and Adamowicz, V. (1998). Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment, Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3-4), 413-428.
14. Hausman, J. A. and Ruud, P. A. (1987). Specifying and Testing Econometric Models for Rank-Ordered Data, Journal of Econometrics, 34, 83-104.
15. Johnson, F. R. and Desvousges, W. H. (1997). Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programmes, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34, 79-99.
16. Krinsky, I. and Robb, A. L. (1986). On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Reported Elasticities, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 715-719.
17. Lareau, T. J. and Rae, D. A. (1985). Valuing Willingness to Pay for Diesel Odor Reduction: An Application of the Contingent Ranking Technique, Southern Economic Journal, 55(3), 728-742.
18. Louviere, J. J. (1988). Analyzing Decision-Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis, No. 67 Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, Sage University Papers, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
19. McClean, R., and Anderson, V. (1984). Applied Factorial and Fractional Designs, New York: Marcel Dekker.
20. MacFadden, D. (1973). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour, in Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press.
21. Mitchell, R. and Carson, R. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
22. Morrison, M., Bennett, J., Blamey, R. and Louviere, J. (1998). Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer, Research Report No.8, The University of New South Wales.
23. Reaves, D., Kramer, R. and Holmes, G. (1994). Valuing the Endangered Red-Cockaded Woodpecker and Its Habitat: A Comparison of Contingent Valuation Elicitation Techniques and a Test for Embedding. Paper Presented at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Session of the Annual American Economics Association Meetings, San Diego, California.
24. Smith, V. K. and Desvousges, W. (1986). Measuring Water Quality Benefits, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
25. Stevens, T. H., Echevarria, J., Glass, R. J., Hager, T. and More T. A. (1991). Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?, Land Economics, 67(4), 390-400.
26. Tolley, G., Kenkel, D. and Fabian, R. (1994). Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. van Ravenswaay, E. O. and Hoehn, J. P. (1991a). The Impact of Health Risk Information on Food Demand: A Case Study of Alar and Apples, in Caswell, J. A. (ed.), Economics of Food Safety. Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., New York, USA.
28. van Ravenswaay, E. O. and Hoehn, J. P. (1991b). Contingent Valuation and Food Safety: The Case of Pesticide Residues in Food, Staff Paper No. 91-13, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
29. van Ravenswaay, E. O. and Hoehn, J. P. (1991c). Consumer Willingness to Pay for Reducing Pesticide Residues in Food: Results of a Nationwide Survey, Staff Paper No. 91-18, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
30. van Ravenswaay, E. O. and Hoehn, J. P. (1991d). Consumer Perspectives on Food Safety Issues: The Case of Pesticide Residues in Fresh Produce, Staff Paper No. 91-20, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
31. Veisten, K., Hoen, H., Navrud, S and Strand, S. (1993). Valuing Biodiversity in Norwegian Forests: A Contingent Valuation Study with Multiple Bias Testing. Memorandum No. 7, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
32. Weaver, R. D. (1994). Pesticide Use and Consumer Demand for Product Quality: A Survey of Evidence, Pesticide Use and Produce Quality, Proceedings of a Workshop Sponsored by the Agricultural and Food Marketing Consortium, The Farm Foundation, Oak Brook, Illinois, USA.