Response to intervention and evidence-based practices: Where does technology fit?

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 257-272

  Smith, Sean J ^a   Okolo, Cynthia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859176568     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: 2168376X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073194871003300404     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adams G. L., Engelmann S. Research in direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems; 1996 :
2. Anderson-Inman L., Homey M. A., Knox-Quinn C., Corrigan B., Ditson M. Computer based study strategies. Eugene, OR: Center for Electronic Studying; 1997 :
3. Bransford J. D., Brown A. L., Cocking R. R. How people learn. Brain, mind, and experience. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999 :
4. BrosnahanR.OkoloC. M. (2010). Promoting academic literacy. Paper presented at the Office of Special Education Program's Research Project Directors' Conference, Washington, DC.
5. Bulgren J., Deshler D. D., Lenz B. K. Engaging adolescents with LD in higher order thinking about history concepts using integrated content enhancement routines. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2007; 40: 121-133
6. Denham C., Lieberman A. Time to learn. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 1980 :
7. Dynarski M., Agodini R., Heaviside S., Novak T., Carey N., Campuzano L., Means B., Murphy R., Penuel W., Javitz H., Emery D., Sussex W. Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first Stud. cohort. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Sciences; 2007 :
8. Englert C. S., Mariage T. V., Okolo C. M., Shankland R. K., Moxley K. D., Courtad C. A., Jocks-Meier B. S., O'Brien J. C., Martin N. M., Chen H. The learning-to-learn strategies of adolescent Stud.s with disabilities highlighting, note taking, planning, and writing expository texts. journal of Learning Disabilities. 2008; 34: 147-161
9. Faggella-Luby M., Schumaker J. S., Deshler D. D. Embedded learning strategy instruction: Story-structure pedagogy in heterogeneous secondary literature classes. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2007; 30: 131-147
10. Fuchs L., Fuchs D., Compton D. Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. The School Psychology Review. 2010; 39 (1). 22-28
11. Fuchs D., Fuchs L., Stecker P. The "blurring" of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children. 2010; 76: 301-323
12. Gajria M., Jitendra A. K., Sood S., Sacks G. Improving comprehension of expository text in Stud.s with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of learning Disabilities. 2007; 40: 210-225
13. Gersten R., Chard D., Jayanthi M., Baker S. K., Morphy P., Flojo J. R. Mathematics Instruction for Stud.s With Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Instructional Components. Review of Educational Research. 2009; 79: 1202-1242
14. Gersten R., Compton D., Connor C. M., Dimino J., Santoro L., Linan-Thompson S., Tilly W. D. Assisting Stud.s struggling with reading: RTI and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, IES, U.S. Department of Education; 2008 :
15. Gillies R. M. Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007 :
16. Graham S., Harris K. R. Handbook of learning disabilities. Swanson H. L. Harris K. R. Graham S., ed. New York: Guilford; 2005: 323-344.
17. Graham S., Perin D. Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools-A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education; 2007 :
18. Griffin C. C., Tulbert B. L. The effect of graphic organizers on Stud.s' comprehension and recall of expository text: A review of the research and implications for practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties. 1995; 11: 73-89
19. Hall T. Explicit instruction. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum; 2002 :
20. Hall T., Strangman N. Graphic organizers. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum; 2002 :
21. Hasselbring T. S., Lott A. C., Zydney J. M. Technology-supported math instruction for Stud.s with disabilities: Two decades of research and development. Washington, DC: CITEd, Center for Implementing Technology in Education; 2006 :
22. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (as amended), 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1401 et seq.
23. Johnson K., Dudgeon B., St Kuehn C. Assistive technology use among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida. American Journal of Public Health. 2007; 97: 330-336
24. Johnston S. S., Evans J. Considering response efficiency as a strategy to prevent assistive technology abandonment. Journal of Special Education Technology. 2005; 20 (3). 45-50
25. Kamps D. M., Greenwood C., Arreaga-Mayer C., Veerkamp M. B., Utley C., Tapia Y., Bowman-Perrott L., Bannister H. The efficacy of classwide peer tutoring in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children. 2008; 31: 119-152
26. Kim A., Vaughn S., Wanzek J., Wei S. Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of Stud.s with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2004; 37 (2). 105-118
27. Kinder D., Bursuck W. History strategy instruction: Problem-solution-effect analysis, timeline, and vocabulary instruction. Exceptional Children. 1993; 59: 324-335
28. King-Sears M., Evmenova A. S. Premises, principles, and processes for integrating TECHnology into instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children. 2007; 40: 6-14
29. Kluger A. N., DeNisi A. Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin. 1996; 119: 254-284
30. Lang L., Torgesen J. K., Vogel W., Chanter C., Lefsky E., Petscher Y. Exploring the relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school Stud.s. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2009; 2: 149-175
31. Lenhart A., Madden M., MacGill A. R., Smith A. Teens and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2007 :
32. Mason L. H., Graham S. Writing instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities: Programs of intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2008; 23: 103-112
33. National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The nation's report card. Retrieved June 30, 2010, from http://nationsreportcard.gov/math-2009/.
34. Okolo C. M., Bouck E. C. Research about assistive technology: 2000-2006. What have we learned?. Journal of Special Education Technology. 2007; 22 (3). 19-33
35. Quinn B. S., Behrmann M., Mastropieri M., Bausch M. E., Ault M. J., Chung Y. Who is using assistive technology in schools?. Journal of Special Education Technology. 2009; 24 (1). 1-13
36. Rideout V. J., Foehr U. G., Roberts D. F. Generation M2. Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2010 :
37. Russell S. J., Crowin R., Mokros J. R., Kapisovsky P. M. Beyond drill and practice: Expanding the computer mainstream. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children; 1989 :
38. Scruggs T., Mastropieri M. A., Berkeley S., Graetz J. E. Do special education interventions improve learning of secondary content? A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education. 2009; 30: 23-56
39. Shuler C. iLearn: Content analysis of the iTunes apps store's education section. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop; 2009 :
40. Stockard J. Promoting reading achievement and countering the "fourth-grade slump": The impact of direct instruction on reading achievement in fifth grade. Journal of Education for Stud.s Placed at Risk. 2009; 15: 218-240
41. Swanson H. L., Hoskyn M. Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2001; 16 (2). 109-119
42. Swanson H. L., Saez L. Handbook of learning disabilities. Swanson H. L. Harris K. Graham S., ed. New York: Guilford; 2006: 182-198.
43. Troia G., Shankland R. K., Heintz A. Putting writing research into practice: Applications for teacher professional development. New York: Guilford; 2010 :
44. Turnbull H. R. Today's policy contexts for special education and Stud.s with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2009; 32: 3-9
45. Vaughn S., Gersten R., Chard D. The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children. 2000; 67: 99-114