Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1202-1242

  Gersten, Russell ^a   Chard, David J ^b   Jayanthi, Madhavi ^a   Baker, Scott K ^c   Morphy, Paul ^d   Flojo, Jonathan ^e  

^a Instructional Research Group   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematical education; Meta analysis; Special education

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950546336     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0034654309334431     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Allinder, R.M., Bolling, R., Oats, R., & Gagnon, W.A. (2000). Effects of teacher self-monitoring on implementation of curriculum-based measurement and mathematics computation achievement of students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 219-226.
2. Bahr, C.M., & Rieth, H.J. (1991). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goals on student achievement using computer-based drill-and-practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11, 33-48.
3. *Baker, D.E. (1992). The effect of self-generated drawings on the ability of students with learning disabilities to solve mathematical word problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
4. Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 51-73.
5. Baker, S., Gersten, S., & Scanlon, D. (2002). Procedural facilitators and cognitive strategies: Tools for unraveling the mysteries of comprehension and the writing process, and for providing meaningful access to the general curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 65-77.
6. Bar-Eli, N., & Raviv, A. (1982). Underachievers as tutors. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 139-143.
7. *Beirne-Smith, M. (1991). Peer tutoring in arithmetic for children with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 57, 330-337.
8. Bottge, B.A., Heinrichs, M., Mehta, Z.D., & Hung, Y. (2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 35, 186-200.
9. Brown, V., Cronin, M., & McEntire, E. (1994). Test of Mathematical Abilities-Second edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.
10. Bryant, D.P., Bryant, B.T., & Hammill, D.D. (2000). Characteristic behaviors of students with LD who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 168-177, 199.
11. Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Busse, R.T., Kratochwill, T.R., & Elliott, S.N. (1995). Meta-analysis for single-case consultation outcomes: Applications to research and practice. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 269-286.
13. Butler, F.M., Miller, S.P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 99-111.
14. Calhoon, M.B., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 235-245.
15. Cawley, J.F., Parmar, R.S., Yan, W., & Miller, J.H. (1998). Arithmetic computation performance of students with learning disabilities: Implications for curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 68-74.
16. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
17. Cortina, J.M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA designs (Vol. 129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials in health research. London: Arnold Publishing.
19. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction. New York: Irvington.
20. Friedman, F. (1992). An evaluation of the integrated cognitive-behavioral model for improving mathematics performance and attentional behavior of adolescents with learning disabilities and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College.
21. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Lipsey, M.W. (2000). Reading differences between underachievers with and without learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. In E. Schiller & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Research syntheses in special education (pp. 81-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Fuchs, D., Roberts, P.H., Fuchs, L.S., & Bowers, J. (1996). Reintegrating students with learning disabilities into the mainstream: A two-year study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11, 214-229.
23. Fuchs, L.S., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J.D., & Hamlett, C.L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493-513.
24. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2003). Enhancing the mathematical problem solving of students with mathematics disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. E. Graham (Eds.), Handbook on learning disabilities (pp. 306-322). New York: Guilford.
25. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429-438.
26. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Appleton, A.C. (2002). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on the mathematical problem-solving performance of students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 90-106.
27. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Phillips, N.B., & Bentz, J. (1994). Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518-537.
28. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement in math. School Psychology Review, 19, 6-22.
29. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
30. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Whinnery, K. (1991). Effects of goal line feedback on level, slope, and stability of performance within curriculum-based measurement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 65-73.
31. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C.L., Katzaroff, M., & Dutka, S. (1997). Effects of task-focused goals on low-achieving students with and without learning disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 513-543.
32. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Phillips, N.B., Hamlett, C.L., & Karns, K. (1995). Acquisition and transfer effects of classwide peer-assisted learning strategies in mathematics for students with varying learning histories. School Psychology Review, 24, 604-620.
33. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Prentice, K. (2004). Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: Comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 293-306.
34. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C.L., Owen, R.,et al.(2003). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 306-315.
35. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S.R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children's mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31, 569-583.
36. Fuson, K.C., & Willis, G.B. (1989). Second graders' use of schematic drawings in solving addition and subtraction word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 514-520.
37. Geary, D.C. (2003). Learning disabilities in arithmetic: Problem solving differences and cognitive deficits. In K. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 199-212). New York: Guilford.
38. Geary, D.C. (2005). Role of cognitive theory in study of learning disability in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 305-307.
39. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 101, 251-272.
40. Gersten, R., Baker, S.K., Pugach, M., Scanlon, D., & Chard, D. (2001). Contemporary research on special education teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 695-722). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
41. Gersten, R., Chard, D., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). A meta-analysis of mathematics instructional interventions for students with learning disabilities: Technical report. Los Alamitos, CA: Instructional Research Group. Available from http://www.inresg.org.
42. Gersten, R., Clarke, B., & Mazzocco, M. (2007). Historical and contemporary perspectives on mathematical learning disabilities. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 7-29). Baltimore: Brooks.
43. Gersten, R., & Hitchcock, J. (2008). What is credible evidence in education: The role of What Works Clearinghouse in informing the process. In S. I. Donaldson, C. A. Christie, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), What counts as credible evidence in applied research and evaluation practice? (pp. 78-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Gleser, L.J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 339-355). New York: Russell Sage.
45. Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing; a meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford.
46. Greene, G. (1999). Mnemonic multiplication fact instruction for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 141-148.
47. Griffin, S.A., Case, R., & Siegler, R.S. (1994). Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 24-49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R.S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 25-33.
49. Hedges, L.V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
50. Hedges, L.V., & Hedberg, E.C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 60-87.
51. Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52. *Hutchinson, N.L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 34-63.
53. Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
54. Jenkins, A.A. (1992). Effects of a vocational mathematics curriculum on achievement of secondary learning-disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
55. Jitendra, A.K., Griffin, C.C., McGoey, K., & Gardill, M.G. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345-355.
56. Kelly, B., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 23-29.
57. Kroesbergen, E.H., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-114.
58. *Lambert, M.A. (1996). Teaching students with learning disabilities to solve word-problems: A comparison of a cognitive strategy and a traditional textbook method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University.
59. *Lee, J.W. (1992). The effectiveness of a novel direct instructional approach on math word problem solving skills of elementary students with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
60. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? Case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35, 3-14.
61. Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.E. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Maccini, P., & Hughes, C.A. (1997). Mathematics interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12, 168-176.
64. Manalo, E., Bunnell, J., & Stillman, J. (2000). The use of process mnemonics in teaching students with mathematics learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 137-156.
65. *Marzola, E. (1987). An arithmetic verbal problem solving model for learning disabled students. New York: Columbia University Teachers College.
66. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Shiah, S. (1991). Mathematics instruction for learning disabled students: A review of research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 89-98.
67. Miller, S.P., Butler, F.M., & Lee, K. (1998). Validated practices for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities: A review of literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1-24.
68. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
69. National Research Council (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford and B. Findell (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
70. Omizo, M.M., Cubberly, W.E., & Cubberly, R.D. (1985). Modeling techniques, perceptions of self-efficacy, and arithmetic achievement among learning disabled children. The Exceptional Child, 32, 99-105.
71. Ostad, S.A. (1998). Developmental differences in solving simple arithmetic word problems and simple number-fact problems: A comparison of mathematically disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 4, 1-19.
72. Owen, R.L., & Fuchs, L.S. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving strategy instruction for third-grade students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 268-278.
73. Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 73-98.
74. Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottge, B., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M.,et al.(2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER 2007-2004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
75. *Pavchinski, P. (1988). The effects of operant procedures and cognitive behavior modification on learning disabled students' math skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
76. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Applications in meta-analysis and other cases where Level-1 variances are known. In Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis method (pp. 205-227). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77. *Reisz, J.D. (1984). The effect of goal-setting activities on the locus of control and achievement of learning disabled middle-school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.
78. Robinson, D., Schofield, J., & Steers-Wentzell, K. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 327-362.
79. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1986). Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effects sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 400-406.
80. Ross, P.A., & Braden, J.P. (1991). The effects of token reinforcement versus cognitive behavior modification on learning-disabled students' math skills. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 247-256.
81. Schunk, D.H., & Cox, P.D. (1986). Strategy training and attributional feedback with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 201-209.
82. Seely, J., & Birkes, D. (1980). Estimability in partitioned linear models. Annals of Statistics, 8, 399-406.
83. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
84. Silbert, J., Carnine, D., & Stein, M. (1989). Direct instruction mathematics. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
85. Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., & Leavey, M. (1984a). Effects of cooperative learning and individualized instruction on mainstreamed students. Exceptional Children, 50, 434-443.
86. Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., & Leavey, M. (1984b). Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and non-handicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 813-819.
87. Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277-321.
88. Swanson, H.L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
89. *Tournaki, N. (1993). Comparison of two methods of teaching addition to learning disabled and regular education students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
90. *Tournaki, N. (2003). The differential effects of teaching addition through strategy instruction versus drill and practice to students with and without disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 449-458.
91. Van Luit, J.E.H., & Naglieri, J.A. (1999). Effectiveness of the MASTER program for teaching special children multiplication and division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 98-107.
92. Walker, D.W., & Poteet, J.A. (1989-1990). A comparison of two methods of teaching mathematics story problem-solving with learning disabled students. National Forum of Special Education Journal, 1, 44-51.
93. What Works Clearinghouse. (2006). WWC teacher-intervention confound. Retrieved January 29, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/teacher_confound.pdf.
94. What Works Clearinghouse. (2007). Technical details of WWC-conducted computations. Retrieved January 29, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/conducted_computations.pdf.
95. Williams, S.R., & Baxter, J.A. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse-oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. Elementary School Journal, 97, 21-38.
96. Wilson, C.L., & Sindelar, P.T. (1991). Direct instruction in math word problems: Students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 57, 512-518.
97. Witzel, B., Mercer, C.D., & Miller, M.D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 121-131.
98. Wong, B., Harris, K., Graham, S., & Butler, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies instruction research in learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383-402). New York: Guilford.
99. Woodward, J. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 269-289.
100. Woodward, J., & Baxter, J. (1997). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low-achieving students in mainstreamed settings. Exceptional Children, 63, 373-388.
101. .Woodward, J., Monroe, K., & Baxter, J. (2001). Enhancing student achievement on performance assessments in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24, 33-46.
102. Wortman, P.M., & Bryant, F.B. (1985). School desegregation and Black achievement: An integrative review. Sociological Methods and Research, 13, 289-324.
103. Xin, Y.P., & Jitendra, A.K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 32, 207-225.
104. Xin, Y.P., Jitendra, A.K., & Deatline-Buchman, A. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. Journal of Special Education, 39, 181-192.
105. Zimmerman, B. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.