Embedded learning strategy instruction: Story-structure pedagogy in heterogeneous secondary literature classes

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 131-147

  Faggella Luby, Michael ^a   Schumaker, Jean S ^b   Deshler, Donald D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250669057     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/30035547     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Carnine, D., & Kinder, D. (1985). Teaching low-performing students to apply generative and schema strategies to narrative and expository material. RASE, 6(1), 20-30.
2. Dcshlcr, D. D., Schumaker, J., Bulgren, J., Lenz, K., Jantzen, J. E., Adams, G., Carnine, D., Grossen, B., Davis, B., & Marquis, J. (2001). Making learning easier: Connecting new knowledge to things students already know. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 82-85.
3. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. (Eds.). (2006). Teaching adolescents with disabilities: Accessing the general education curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
4. Dimino, J., Gersten, R., Gamine, D., & Blake, G. (1990). Story grammar: An approach for promoting at-risk secondary students' comprehension of literature. The Elementary School Journal, 92(1), 19-32.
5. Ellis, E. S. (2000). The LINCS vocabulary strategy (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
6. Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., Garmon, M. A., & Tarrant, K. L. (1998). Accelerating reading progress in early literacy project classrooms: Three exploratory studies. Remedial and Special Education, 19(3), 142-159.
7. EXPLORE Test. (2005). Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc. Faggella-Luby, M. (2006). Embedded learning strategy instruction: Story-structure pedagogy in secondary classes for diverse learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
8. Fitzgerald, J., & Spiegel, D. L. (1983). Enhancing children's reading comprehension through instruction in narrative structure. loiimal of Reading Behavior, 15, 1-17.
9. Gardill, M. C., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities, Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 2-17.
10. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279-320.
11. Griffey, Q. L., Jr., Zigmond, N., & Lelnhardt, G. (1988). The effects of self-questioning and story structure training on the reading comprehension of poor readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 4(1), 45-51.
12. Gurney, D., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., & Carnine, D. (1990). Story grammar: Effective literature instruction for high school students with learning disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(6), 33-343.
13. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). P. L. 108-446.
14. Idol, L. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(4), 196-205.
15. Idol, L., & Croll, V. J. (1987). Story mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 214-229.
16. Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R. B. Rudell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1270-1324). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 111-151.
18. MetaMetrics. (2000), The Lexlle framework for reading. Durham, NC: Author. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://lexile. com/faq.htm.
19. Montague, M., Maddux, C. D., & Dereshiwsky, M. I. (1990). Story grammar and comprehension and production of narrative prose by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(3), 190-197.
20. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities (NRCLD). (2002). Researcher consensus statement. Information Digest Number 3. Retrieved November 19, 2005, from http://www. nrcld.org/html/information/articles/digests/ digest3.html
21. Olson, M. W., & Gee, T. C. (1988). Understanding narrative: A review of story grammar research. Childhood Education, 64(5), 302-306.
22. Ouellette, G., Dagostino, L., & Carifio, J. (1998). The relationship of children's expectations for structure in story to their knowledge of literature and their reading ability. Reading Improvement, 35(3), 98-113.
23. Perie, M., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2005 (NCES 2006-451). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. Raphael, T. (1982). Question-answering strategies for children. The Reading Teacher, 36(2), 186-190.
25. Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question-answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 516-522.
26. Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Press.
27. Short, E. J., & Ryan, E. B. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 225-235.
28. Singer, H., & Donlan, D. (1982). Active comprehension: Problemsolving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 166-185.
29. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1978). An analysis of story composition on elementary school children. In Friedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Volume 2, pp. 53-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. Swanson, H. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instructional method. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 129-140.
31. Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.
32. Warner, M. M., Schumaker, J. B., Alley, G. R., & Deshler, D. D. (1980). Learning disabled adolescents in public schools: Are they different from other low achievers? Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1(2), 27-35.
33. Weaver, P. A., & Dickinson, D. K. (1982). Scratching below the surface structure: Exploring the usefulness of story grammars. Discourse Processes, 5(3), 225-243.
34. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
35. Wechsler, D. (2003). WISC-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
36. Whaley, J. F. (1981). Readers' expectations for story structures. Reading Research Quarterly, 1(9), 107-111
37. Woods, M. L., & Moe, A. J. (2003). Reader's passages to accompany: Analytic Reading Inventory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.