Graphic Organizers and Their Effects on the Reading Comprehension of Students with LD: A Synthesis of Research

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 105-118

  Kim, Ae Hwa ^a   Vaughn, Sharon ^b   Wanzek, Jeanne ^b   Wei, Shangjin ^b  

^a Dankook University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642587235     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194040370020201     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alvermann, D. E., & Boothby, P. R. (1986). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction. Reading Psychology, 7(2), 87-100.
2. Anders, P. L., Bos, C. S., & Filip, D. (1984). The effect of semantic feature analysis on the reading comprehension of learning disabled students. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Changing perspectives on reading/language processing and instruction (pp. 162-166). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
3. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
4. Bean, T. W., Singer, H., Sorter, J., & Frazee, C. (1986). The effect of metacognitive instruction in outlining and graphic organizer construction on students' comprehension in a tenth-grade world history class. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 153-169.
5. Becker, B. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257-278.
6. Bergerud, D., Lovitt, T. C., & Horton, S. (1988). The effectiveness of textbook adaptations in life science for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 70-76.
7. Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2001). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent readers. New York: Guilford Press.
8. Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31-42.
9. Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1992). Using interactive teaching and learning strategies to promote text comprehension and content learning for students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 39, 225-238.
10. Bos, C. S., Anders, P. L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L. E. (1985). Semantic feature analysis and long-term learning. In J. A. Niles & R. V. Lalik (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 42-47). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
11. Bos, C. S., Anders, P. L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L. E. (1989). Effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 384-390.
12. Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Boyle, J. R. (1996). The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 86-98.
14. Boyle, J. R. (2000). The effects of a Venn diagram strategy on the literal, inferential, and relational comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 5-13.
15. Boyle, J. R., & Weishaar, M. (1997). The effects of expert-generated versus student-generated cognitive organizers on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 228-235.
16. Boyle, J. R., & Yeager, N. (1997). Blueprints for learning: Using cognitive frameworks for understanding. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(4), 26-31.
17. Bryant, D. P., Ugel, N., Thompson, S., & Hamff, A. (1999). Instructional strategies for content-area reading instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 293-302.
18. Bryant, D. P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle-school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(3), 24-38.
19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum..
20. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Darch, C., & Carnine, D. (1986). Teaching content area material to learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 53, 240-246.
22. Darch, C., & Eaves, R. (1986). Visual displays to increase comprehension of high school learning-disabled students. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 309-318.
23. Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1986). Direction-setting activities in reading comprehension: A comparison of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 235-243.
24. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. (1993). Strategy mastery by at-risk students: Not a simple matter. Elementary School Journal, 94, 153-167.
25. Dunston, P. J. (1992). A critique of graphic organizer research. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(2), 57-65.
26. Elbaum, B. E., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
27. Gardill, M. C., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 2-17.
28. Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Lloyd, J. W. (2000). Designing high-quality research in special education: Group experimental design. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 2-18.
29. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S.,Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
30. Griffin, C. C., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (1991). Investigating the effectiveness of graphic organizer instruction on the comprehension and recall of science content by students with learning disabilities. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 7, 355-376.
31. Griffin, C. C., & Tulbert, B. L. (1995). The effect of graphic organizers on students' comprehension and recall of expository text: A review of the research and implications for practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11, 73-89.
32. Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12-22.
33. Hudson, P., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Miller, T. (1993). Using content enhancements to improve the performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in content classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 106-126.
34. Karlsen, B., & Garduel, E. F. Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Educational Measurement.
35. Lapp, D., Flood, J., & Ranck-Buhr, W. (1995). Using multiple text formats to explore scientific phenomena in middle school classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11, 173-186.
36. Lovitt, T., Rudsit, J., Jenkins, J., Pious, C., & Benedetti, D. (1986). Adapting science materials for regular and learning disabled seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 31-39.
37. Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 30-42.
38. Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effects of graphic organizers on learning from text. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Perspectives in reading research and instruction: Twenty-ninth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 213-217). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
39. Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 11-17.
40. Pirozzolo, F. J., & Rayner, K. (1979). Cerebral organization and reading disability. Neuropsychologia, 17, 485-491.
41. Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (1994). More about increasing the quality of educational intervention research: A synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 191-208.
42. Rice, G. E. (1994). Need for explanations in graphic organizer research. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 15, 39-67.
43. Rivera, D. P., & Smith, D. (1997). Teaching students with learning and behavior problems (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Simmons, D. C., Griffin, C. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (1988). Effects of teacher-constructed pre- and post-graphic organizer instruction on sixth-grade science students' comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Research, 82(1), 15-21.
47. Sinatra, R. C., Stahl-Gemake, J., & Berg, D. N. (1984). Improving reading comprehension of disabled readers through mapping. The Reading Teacher, 38(1), 22-29.
48. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
49. Taylor, B., Harris, L., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). Reading difficulties: Instruction and assessment. New York: Random House.
50. Vellutino, F., Harding, C., Stager, J., & Phillips, F. (1975). Differential transfer in poor and normal readers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 126, 3-18.
51. Weisberg, R., & Balajthy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers' metacomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6(2), 117-136.
52. Witelson, S. (1977). Developmental dyslexia: Two right hemispheres and none left. Science, 195, 309-311.
53. Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Knowledge acquisition and comprehension. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 699-705). New York: Macmillan.
54. Wong, B. (1978). The effects of directive cues on the organization of memory and recall in good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 32-38.