Protective effects of hypothermic ex vivo perfusion on ischemia/reperfusion injury and transplant outcomes

Transplantation Reviews

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 163-175

  Henry, Scot D ^a   Guarrera, James V ^a  

^a New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; INTERLEUKIN 6; INTERLEUKIN 8; MELILOTUS EXTRACT; PRESERVATION SOLUTION; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VASOSOL;

COLD ISCHEMIA; CRYOPRESERVATION; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DONATION AFTER CARDIAC DEATH; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEART DEATH; HUMAN; HYPOTHERMIA; HYPOTHERMIC MACHINE PRESERVATION; INTESTINE TRANSPLANTATION; ISCHEMIA; ISCHEMIA REPERFUSION INJURY; KIDNEY PRESERVATION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVER PRESERVATION; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; ORGAN DONOR; OXYGEN THERAPY; OXYGENATION; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERFUSION PRESSURE; REPERFUSION INJURY; REVIEW; TEMPERATURE; VEIN THROMBOSIS;

EID: 84858999883     PISSN: 0955470X     EISSN: 15579816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2011.09.001     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. OPTN, "Annual report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: transplant data 1988-2010.," Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI 2010.
2. Collins G.M., et al. Kidney preservation for transportation. Initial perfusion and 30 hours' ice storage. Lancet 1969, 2:1219-1222.
3. Momii S., Koga A. Time-related morphological changes in cold-stored rat livers. A comparison of Euro-Collins solution with UW solution. Transplantation 1990, 50:745-750.
4. Gebhard M.M., et al. Calcium-free cardioplegia-pro. Eur Heart J 1983, 4(Suppl H):151-160.
5. Belzer F.O., Southard J.H. Principles of solid-organ preservation by cold storage. Transplantation 1988, 45:673-676.
6. Menasche P., et al. Experimental evaluation of Celsior, a new heart preservation solution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994, 8:207-213.
7. Taylor M.J., Baicu S.C. Current state of hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of organs: the clinical perspective. Cryobiology 2010, 60:S20-S35.
8. Caldwell-Kenkel J.C., et al. Reperfusion injury to endothelial cells following cold ischemic storage of rat livers. Hepatology 1989, 10:292-299.
9. McKeown C.M., et al. Sinusoidal lining cell damage: the critical injury in cold preservation of liver allografts in the rat. Transplantation 1988, 46:178-191.
10. Vollmar B., et al. Hepatic microcirculatory perfusion failure is a determinant of liver dysfunction in warm ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Pathol 1994, 145:1421-1431.
11. Caldwell-Kenkel J.C., et al. Kupffer cell activation and endothelial cell damage after storage of rat livers: effects of reperfusion. Hepatology 1991, 13:83-95.
12. Jaeschke H., Farhood A. Neutrophil and Kupffer cell-induced oxidant stress and ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat liver. Am J Physiol 1991, 260:G355-G362.
13. Jaeschke H., et al. Neutrophils contribute to ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat liver in vivo. Faseb J 1990, 4:3355-3359.
14. Clavien P.A., et al. Preservation and reperfusion injuries in liver allografts. An overview and synthesis of current studies. Transplantation 1992, 53:957-978.
15. Jaeschke H. Mechanisms of liver injury. II. Mechanisms of neutrophil-induced liver cell injury during hepatic ischemia-reperfusion and other acute inflammatory conditions. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006, 290:G1083-G1088.
16. Colletti L.M., et al. Role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the pathophysiologic alterations after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in the rat. J Clin Invest 1990, 85:1936-1943.
17. Menger M.D. Microcirculatory disturbances secondary to ischemia-reperfusion. Transplant Proc 1995, 27:2863-2865.
18. Banga N.R., et al. Ischaemic preconditioning in transplantation and major resection of the liver. Br J Surg 2005, 92:528-538.
19. Selzner N., et al. Protective strategies against ischemic injury of the liver. Gastroenterology 2003, 125:917-936.
20. Serracino-Inglott F., et al. Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Surg 2001, 181:160-166.
21. Lichtman S.N., Lemasters J.J. Role of cytokines and cytokine-producing cells in reperfusion injury to the liver. Semin Liver Dis 1999, 19:171-187.
22. Polyak M.M., et al. Effect of a novel solution for organ preservation on equine large colon in an isolated pulsatile perfusion system. Equine Vet J 2008, 40:306-312.
23. Alteveer R.J., et al. Hemodynamics and metabolism of the in vivo vascularly isolated canine pancreas. Am J Physiol 1979, 236:E626-E632.
24. Florack G., et al. Technical aspects of segmental pancreatic autotransplantation in dogs. Am J Surg 1983, 146:565-574.
25. Squifflet J.P., et al. Technical aspects of segmental pancreatic grafting in rats. Microsurgery 1983, 4:61-66.
26. Tersigni R., et al. Pancreaticoduodenal preservation by hypothermic pulsatile perfusion for twenty-four hours,. Ann Surg 1975, 182:743-748.
27. Toledo-Pereyra L.H., et al. Hypothermic pulsatile perfusion: its use in the preservation of pancreases for 24 to 48 hours before islet cell transplantation. Arch Surg 1980, 115:95-98.
28. Leeser D.B., et al. Pulsatile pump perfusion of pancreata before human islet cell isolation. Transplant Proc 2004, 36:1050-1051.
29. Karcz M., et al. An ex-vivo model for hypothermic pulsatile perfusion of porcine pancreata: hemodynamic and morphologic characteristics. Exp Clin Transplant 2010, 8:55-60.
30. Taylor M.J., et al. Islet isolation from juvenile porcine pancreas after 24-h hypothermic machine perfusion preservation. Cell Transplant 2010, 19:613-628.
31. Chen K.H., et al. Curcumin attenuates airway hyperreactivity induced by ischemia-reperfusion of the pancreas in rats. Transplant Proc 2010, 42:744-747.
32. Mirbolooki M.R., et al. Pancreatic duct: a suitable route to oxygenate tissue during pancreas hypothermic preservation?. Transpl Immunol 2010, 22:191-194.
33. Nikeghbalian S., et al. The effect of ischemic preconditioning of the pancreas on severity of ischemia/reperfusion-induced pancreatitis after a long period of ischemia in the rat. Transplant Proc 2009, 41:2743-2746.
34. Nozickova M., et al. The effect of benzo-pyrones on the canine pancreas submitted to long-term hypothermic perfusion. Z Exp Chir 1981, 14:30-34.
35. Taylor M.J., et al. Twenty-four hour hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of porcine pancreas facilitates processing for islet isolation. Transplant Proc 2008, 40:480-482.
36. Baertschiger R.M., et al. Organ preservation in pancreas and islet transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2008, 13:59-66.
37. Belzer F.O., Kountz S.L. Preservation and transplantation of human cadaver kidneys: a two-year experience. Ann Surg 1970, 172:394-404.
38. Moore T.C., et al. Multi-institutional use of a mobile kidney preservation unit. Transplantation 1971, 12:526-527.
39. Sterling W.A., et al. A comparison of hypothermic preservation with hypothermic pulsatile perfusion in paired human kidneys. Surg Forum 1971, 22:229-230.
40. Claes G., et al. Experimental and clinical results of continuous hypothermic albumin perfusion. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 1972, 9:484-490.
41. McCabe R.E., Fitzpatrick H.F. The preservation of human cadaver kidneys for transplantation. JAMA 1972, 219:1056-1059.
42. Stephenson T.P., et al. Preservation of human kidneys for transplantation: preliminary results with a Gambro perfusion machine. Br Med J 1973, 1:379-381.
43. Moore T.C., et al. Early post-transplantation slow function of twenty-six machine-preserved human cadaveric kidneys. Am J Surg 1974, 127:725-729.
44. Moore T.C., et al. Influence of duration of hemodialysis on early post-transplant function of machine preserved human cadaveric kidneys. Ann Surg 1974, 179:499-504.
45. Moore T.C., et al. Accelerated rejection of 36 immediate posttransplant functioning machine-preserved human cadaveric kidneys. Surgery 1974, 75:357-367.
46. Moore T.C., et al. Early post-transplant function of machine-preserved cadaveric kidneys in sensitized recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974, 139:45-48.
47. Moore T.C., et al. Effect of early transplant function as an index of recipient presensitization on long-term function of machine-preserved cadaveric kidneys. Am J Surg 1974, 128:293-300.
48. Moore T.C., et al. Machine preservation of 302 human cadaveric kidneys for transplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974, 138:239-243.
49. Moore T.C., et al. Factors involved in discarding cadaveric kidneys preserved by machine perfusion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974, 138:345-348.
50. Moore T.C., et al. Early post-transplant function of 33 machine-preserved human cadaveric kidneys in children. Pediatrics 1974, 54:773-778.
51. Sheil A.G., et al. A comparison of cryoprecipitated plasma and albumin solutions for machine preservation of ischaemically damaged canine kidneys. Aust N Z J Surg 1974, 44:412-414.
52. Sampson D., et al. Flow and function in machine-preserved kidneys. Br J Surg 1978, 65:37-40.
53. Belzer F.O., Southard J.H. The future of kidney preservation. Transplantation 1980, 30:161-165.
54. Ploeg R.J., et al. Successful 72-hour cold storage of dog kidneys with UW solution. Transplantation 1988, 46:191-196.
55. Divonin A.L., et al. Changes in the liver circulation and kidney function during pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion. Anesteziol Reanimatol 1991, 36-40.
56. Fukae K., et al. The effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile systemic perfusion on renal sympathetic nerve activity in anesthetized dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996, 111:478-484.
57. Kozaki K., et al. Prediction of kidney nonfunction after transplantation with machine perfusion preservation. Transplant Proc 2000, 32:275-276.
58. Kozaki K., et al. Usefulness of continuous hypothermic perfusion preservation for cadaveric renal grafts in poor condition. Transplant Proc 1995, 27:757-758.
59. Doorschodt B.M., et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion of kidney grafts: which pressure is preferred?. Ann Biomed Eng 2011, 39(3):1051-1059.
60. Balupuri S., et al. Assessment of non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) kidneys for viability on machine perfusion. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000, 38:1103-1106.
61. Balupuri S., et al. Machine perfusion and viability assessment of non-heart-beating donor kidneys-a single-centre result. Transplant Proc 2001, 33:1119-1120.
62. Deschenes M., et al. Early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation: a definition and predictors of outcome. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database. Transplantation 1998, 66:302-310.
63. Polyak M., et al. Pulsatile preservation characteristics predict early graft function in extended criteria donor kidneys. Transplant Proc 1997, 29:3582-3583.
64. Nyberg S.L., et al. Improving the prediction of donor kidney quality: deceased donor score and resistive indices. Transplantation 2005, 80:925-929.
65. Sonnenday C.J., et al. The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone. Transplantation 2003, 75:2029-2033.
66. Guarrera J.V., et al. "When good kidneys pump badly": outcomes of deceased donor renal allografts with poor pulsatile perfusion characteristics. Transpl Int 2010, 23(4):444-446.
67. Mozes M.F., et al. Use of perfusion parameters in predicting outcomes of machine-preserved kidneys. Transplant Proc 2005, 37:350-351.
68. Maathuis M.H., et al. Improved kidney graft function after preservation using a novel hypothermic machine perfusion device. Ann Surg 2007, 246:982-988. [discussion 989-91].
69. La Manna G., et al. An in vivo autotransplant model of renal preservation: cold storage versus machine perfusion in the prevention of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Artif Organs 2009, 33:565-570.
70. Hosgood S.A., et al. A comparison of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage in an experimental model of renal ischemia reperfusion injury. Transplantation 2010, 89:830-837.
71. Sellers M.T., et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transplant 2000, 14:543-549.
72. Kwiatkowski A., et al. Machine perfusion preservation improves renal allograft survival. Am J Transplant 2007, 7:1942-1947.
73. Shah A.P., et al. Comparison of pulsatile perfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts. Transplantation 2008, 86:1006-1009.
74. Moers C., et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:7-19.
75. Suarez J.F., et al. Preservation of kidneys from marginal donors with pulsatile perfusion machine. Transplant Proc 1999, 31:2292-2293.
76. Balupuri S., et al. Early results of a non-heartbeating donor (NHBD) programme with machine perfusion. Transpl Int 2000, 13(Suppl 1):S255-S258.
77. Wight J.P., et al. Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic review. Clin Transplant 2003, 17:293-307.
78. Matsuoka L., et al. Pulsatile perfusion reduces the incidence of delayed graft function in expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006, 6:1473-1478.
79. Dutkowski P., et al. Machine perfusion for "marginal" liver grafts. Am J Transplant 2008, 8:917-924.
80. Guarrera J.V., et al. Pushing the envelope in renal preservation; improved results with novel perfusate modifications for pulsatile machine perfusion of cadaver kidneys. Transplant Proc 2004, 36:1257-1260.
81. Guarrera J.V., et al. Pulsatile machine perfusion with Vasosol solution improves early graft function after cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 2004, 77:1264-1268.
82. Polyak M.M., et al. Donor treatment with phentolamine mesylate improves machine preservation dynamics and early renal allograft function. Transplantation 2000, 69:184-186.
83. Doorschodt B.M., et al. Evaluation of a novel system for hypothermic oxygenated pulsatile perfusion preservation. Int J Artif Organs 2009, 32:728-738.
84. Treckmann J., et al. Function and quality of kidneys after cold storage, machine perfusion, or retrograde oxygen persufflation: results from a porcine autotransplantation model. Cryobiology 2009, 59:19-23.
85. Fan C., et al. Therapeutic approaches for ischemia/reperfusion injury in the liver. J Mol Med 1999, 77:577-592.
86. Lentsch A.B., et al. Inflammatory mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for warm hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Hepatology 2000, 32:169-173.
87. Boros P., Bromberg J.S. New cellular and molecular immune pathways in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Am J Transplant 2006, 6:652-658.
88. Maheshwari A., et al. Biliary complications and outcomes of liver transplantation from donors after cardiac death. Liver Transpl 2007, 13:1645-1653.
89. Fondevila C., et al. The membrane attack complex (C5b-9) in liver cold ischemia and reperfusion injury. Liver Transpl 2008, 14:1133-1141.
90. Schreinemachers M.C.J.M., et al. Machine perfusion preservation of the liver: a worthwhile clinical activity?. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2007, 224-230.
91. Lee C.Y., et al. Functional recovery of preserved livers following warm ischemia: improvement by machine perfusion preservation. Transplantation 2002, 74:944-951.
92. Xu H., et al. Pronlonged hypothermic machine perfusion preserves hepatocellular function but potentiates endothelial cell dysfunction in rat livers. Transplantation 2004, 77:1676-1682.
93. Bessems M., et al. Machine perfusion preservation of the non-heart-beating donor rat livers using polysol, a new preservation solution. Transplant Proc 2005, 37:326-328.
94. Bessems M., et al. Improved machine perfusion preservation of the non-heart-beating donor rat liver using Polysol: a new machine perfusion preservation solution. Liver Transpl 2005, 11:1379-1388.
95. Bessems M., et al. Preservation of steatotic livers: a comparison between cold storage and machine perfusion preservation. Liver Transpl 2007, 13:497-504.
96. Dutkowski P., et al. Rescue of the cold preserved rat liver by hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion. Am J Transplant 2006, 6:903-912.
97. Belzer F.O., et al. 24-hour and 72-hour preservation of canine kidneys. Lancet 1967, 2:536-538.
98. Saad S., Minor T. Short-term resuscitation of predamaged donor livers by brief machine perfusion: the influence of temperature. Transplant Proc 2008, 40:3321-3326.
99. Vairetti M., et al. Correlation between the liver temperature employed during machine perfusion and reperfusion damage: role of Ca2+. Liver Transpl 2008, 14:494-503.
100. Olschewski P., et al. The influence of storage temperature during machine perfusion on preservation quality of marginal donor livers. Cryobiology 2010, 60:337-343.
101. Iwamoto H., et al. Beneficial effect of machine perfusion preservation on liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors. Transplant Proc 2000, 32:1645-1646.
102. Jain S., et al. Hepatic function in hypothermically stored porcine livers: comparison of hypothermic machine perfusion vs cold storage. Transplant Proc 2005, 37:340-341.
103. Guarrera J.V., et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion of liver grafts for transplantation: technical development in human discard and miniature swine models. Transplant Proc 2005, 37:323-325.
104. Bessems M., et al. Machine perfusion preservation of the pig liver using a new preservation solution, Polysol. Transplant Proc 2006, 38:1238-1242.
105. Guarrera J.V., et al. Hypothermic machine preservation in human liver transplantation: the first clinical series. Am J Transplant 2010, 10:372-381.
106. Guarrera J.V., et al. Hypothermic machine preservation attenuates ischemia/reperfusion markers after liver transplantation: preliminary results. J Surg Res 2011, 167(2):e365-e373.
107. Bessems M., et al. Wash-out of the non-heart-beating donor liver: a comparison between ringer lactate, HTK, and Polysol. Transplant Proc 2005, 37:395-398.
108. Bessems M., et al. Improved rat liver preservation by hypothermic continuous machine perfusion using Polysol, a new, enriched preservation solution. Liver Transpl 2005, 11:539-546.
109. t Hart N.A., et al. Development of the isolated dual perfused rat liver model as an improved reperfusion model for transplantation research. Int J Artif Organs 2006, 29:219-227.
110. Vekemans K., et al. Artificial circulation of the liver: machine perfusion as a preservation method in liver transplantation. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2008, 291:735-740.
111. Brockmann J., et al. Normothermic perfusion: a new paradigm for organ preservation. Ann Surg 2009, 250:1-6.
112. Tolboom H., et al. Recovery of warm ischemic rat liver grafts by normothermic extracorporeal perfusion. Transplantation 2009, 87:170-177.
113. Vogel T., et al. Ex-vivo normothermic liver perfusion: an update. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2010, 15:167-172.
114. Fondevila C. Is extracorporeal support becoming the new standard for the preservation of DCD grafts?. Am J Transplant 2010, 10:1341-1342.
115. Fujita S., et al. Evaluation of oxygen necessity during hypothermic liver perfusion. Nippon Geka Hokan 1993, 62:228-240.
116. de Rougemont O., et al. One hour hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) protects nonviable liver allografts donated after cardiac death. Ann Surg 2009, 250:674-683.
117. van der Plaats A., et al. The Groningen hypothermic liver perfusion pump: functional evaluation of a new machine perfusion system. Ann Biomed Eng 2006, 34:1924-1934.
118. Manekeller S., et al. Liver integrity after warm ischemia in situ and brief preservation ex vivo: the value of aerobic post-conditioning. Cryobiology 2007, 55:249-254.
119. Stegemann J., et al. Gaseous oxygen persufflation or oxygenated machine perfusion with Custodiol-N for long-term preservation of ischemic rat livers?. Cryobiology 2009, 58:45-51.