The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone

Transplantation

Volumn 75, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 2029-2033

  Sonnenday, Christopher J ^a   Cooper, Matthew ^a   Kraus, Edward ^a   Gage, Fred ^b   Handley, Christopher ^c   Montgomery, Robert A ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Organ Recovery Systems Inc   (United States)

^c Transplant Rsrc Center of Maryland   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CADAVER DONOR; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; QUALITY CONTROL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 0037774764     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000065296.35395.FD     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Merion RM, Oh HK, Port FK, et al. A prospective controlled trial of cold-storage versus machine-perfusion preservation in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 1990; 50(2): 230.
2. Halloran P, Aprile M. A randomized prospective trial of cold storage versus pulsatile perfusion for cadaver kidney preservation. Transplantation 1987; 43(6): 827.
3. Sellers MT, Gallichio MH, Hudson SL, et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transplant 2000; 14(6): 543.
4. Polyak MM, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT, et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 2000; 69(2): 249.
5. Belzer FO, Glass NR, Sollinger HW, et al. A new perfusate for kidney preservation. Transplantation 1982; 33(3): 322.
6. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16(1): 31.
7. Belzer FO, Southard JH. Principles of solid-organ preservation by cold storage. Transplantation 1988; 45(4): 673.
8. Suarez JF, Riera L, Franco E, et al. Preservation of kidneys from marginal donors with pulsatile perfusion machine. Transplant Proc 1999; 31(6): 2292.
9. Tesi RJ, Elkhammas EA, Davies EA, et al. Pulsatile kidney perfusion for evaluation of high-risk kidney donors safely expands the donor pool. Clin Transplant 1994; 8(2 Pt 1): 134.
10. Polyak M, Boykin J, Arrington B, et al. Pulsatile preservation characteristics predict early graft function in extended criteria donor kidneys. Transplant Proc 1997; 29(8): 3582.
11. Burdick JF, Rosendale JD, McBride MA, et al. National impact of pulsatile perfusion on cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1997; 64(12): 1730.
12. Wynn JJ. Report to the OPTN/UNOS Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Committee to the Board of Directors. 2001.
13. Hetzel R, Klein B, Brause M, et al. Risk factors for delayed graft function after renal transplantation and their significance for long-term clinical outcome. Transpl Int 2002; 15(1): 10.
14. Geddes CC, Woo YM, Jardine AG. The impact of delayed graft function on the long-term outcome of renal transplantation. J Nephrol 2002; 15(1): 17.
15. Hariharan S, McBride MA, Cherikh WS, et al. Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival. Kidney Int 2002; 62(1): 311.
16. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999; 341(23): 1725.
17. Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H, et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12(3): 589.
18. Szust J, Olson L, Cravero L. A comparison of OPO pulsatile machine preservation practices and results. J Transpl Coord 1999; 9(2): 97.
19. Polyak MM, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT, et al. Prostaglandin E1 influences pulsatile preservation characteristics and early graft function in expanded criteria donor kidneys. J Surg Res 1999; 85(1): 17.