An in vivo autotransplant model of renal preservation: Cold storage versus machine perfusion in the prevention of ischemia/reperfusion injury

Artificial Organs

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 565-570

  La Manna, Gaetano ^a,b   Conte, Diletta ^a,b   Cappuccilli, Maria Laura ^a,b   Nardo, Bruno ^b   D'Addio, Francesca ^a   Puviani, Lorenza ^a,b   Comai, Giorgia ^a   Bianchi, Francesca ^a,b   Bertelli, Riccardo ^b   Lanci, Nicole ^a,b   Donati, Gabriele ^a   Scolari, Maria Piera ^a   Faenza, Alessandro ^b   Stefoni, Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Delayed graft function; Ischemia reperfusion injury; Kidney function; Machine perfusion; Organ preservation; Renal transplantation

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; CELL DEATH; GENE EXPRESSION;

ADENOSINE-5-TRIPHOSPHATE; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; GRAFT FUNCTIONS; HYPOTHERMIC; ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION INJURY; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MACHINE PERFUSION; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PERFORIN; RENAL TRANSPLANTATION;

COLD STORAGE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; PERFORIN;

ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; BLOOD ANALYSIS; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; GAS ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOLOGY; HISTOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; KIDNEY; KIDNEY AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY PRESERVATION; MACHINE; MODEL; NEPHRECTOMY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORGAN WEIGHT; PARAMETER; PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REPERFUSION INJURY; SWINE; URINE; WEIGHT CHANGE;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

EID: 67650799641     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00743.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Koning OH, Ploeg RJ, van Bockel JH, et al. Risk factors for delayed graft function in cadaveric kidney transplantation. A prospective study of renal function and graft survival after preservation with University of Wisconsin solution in multi-organ donors. European Multicenter Study Group. Transplantation 1997 63 : 1620 8.
2. Boros P, Bromberg JS. New cellular and molecular immune pathways in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Am J Transplant 2006 6 : 652 8.
3. United Network for Organ Sharing 2007 Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1997-2006. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI.
4. Wight J, Chilcott J, Holmes M, Brewer N. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation retrieved from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors. Health Technol Assess 2003 7 : 1 94.
5. Schold JD, Kaplan B, Howard RJ, Reed AI, Foley DP. Are we frozen in time? Analysis of the utilization and efficacy of pulsatile perfusion in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005 5 : 1681 8.
6. Nicholson ML, Hosgood SA, Metcalfe MS, Waller JR, Brook NR. A comparison of renal preservation by cold storage and machine perfusion using a porcine autotransplant model. Transplantation 2004 78 : 333 7.
7. Maathuis MH, Manekeller S, van der Plaats A, et al. Improved kidney graft function after preservation using a novel hypothermic machine perfusion device. Ann Surg 2007 246 : 982 8, discussion 989 91.
8. Kwiatkowski A, Wszola M, Kosieradzki M, et al. Machine perfusion preservation improves renal allograft survival. Am J Transplant 2007 7 : 1942 7.
9. Henry M, Pelletier RP, Elkhammas EA, et al. Pulsatile preservation is associated with a low incidence of delayed graft function. Am J Transplant 2003 3 (Suppl. 5 428.
10. Sellers MT, Gallichio MH, Hudson SL, et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transpl 2000 14 : 543 9.
11. Stratta RJ, Moore PS, Farney AC, et al. Influence of pulsatile perfusion preservation on outcomes in kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors. J Am Coll Surg 2007 204 : 873 82.
12. Rakhorst G, Ploeg RJ. Revival of machine perfusion: new chances to increase the donor pool? Expert Rev Med Devices 2005 2 : 7 8. (Pubitemid 40124893)
13. McAnulty JF, Vreugdenhil PK, Lindell S, Southard JH, Belzer FO. Successful 7-day perfusion preservation of the canine kidney. Transplant Proc 1993 25 : 1642 4.
14. Fujino Y, Kakinoki K, Suzuki Y, et al. Successful 24-h preservation of ischemically damaged canine small intestine by the cavitary two-layer method. Transplantation 2003 76 : 777 80.
15. Lodge JPA, Perry SL, Skinner C, et al. Improved porcine renal preservation with a simple extracellular solution: PBS140. Transplantation 1991 51 : 574 9.
16. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001 25 : 402 8.
17. Wight JP, Chilcott JB, Holmes MW, Brewer N. Pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic review. Clin Transpl 2003 17 : 293 307. (Pubitemid 36958191)
18. van der Plaats A, Maathuis MH T Hart NA, et al. The Groningen hypothermic liver perfusion pump: functional evaluation of a new machine perfusion system. Ann Biomed Eng 2006 34 : 1924 34.
19. Sammut IA, Thorniley MS, Simpkin S, et al. Impairment of hepatic mitochondrial respiratory function following storage and orthotopic transplantation of rat livers. Cryobiology 1998 36 : 49 60. (Pubitemid 128415226)
20. Zenebe WJ, Nazarewicz RR, Parihar MS, Ghafourifar P. Hypoxia/ reoxygenation of isolated rat heart mitochondria causes cytochrome c release and oxidative stress; evidence for involvement of mitochondrial nitric oxide synthase. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2007 43 : 411 19. Epub 2007 Jun 2.
21. Waller HL, Harper SJ, Hosgood SA, et al. Differential expression of cytoprotective and apoptotic genes in an ischaemia-reperfusion isolated organ perfusion model of the transplanted kidney. Transpl Int 2007 20 : 625 31.
22. Cullen SP, Martin SJ. Mechanisms of granule-dependent killing. Cell Death Differ 2008 15 : 251 62. Epub 2007 Nov 2.
23. Peltz M, He TT, Adams GA, 4th., et al. Perfusion preservation maintains myocardial ATP levels and reduces apoptosis in an ex vivo rat heart transplantation model. Surgery 2005 138 : 795 805. (Pubitemid 41546204)
24. Wilson CH, Gok MA, Shenton BK, et al. Weight increase during machine perfusion may be an indicator of organ and in particular, vascular damage. Ann Transpl 2004 9 : 31 2.