Human guidance of synchronous e-discussions: The effects of different moderation scripts on peer argumentation

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices, CSCL 2009 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 497-506

  Schwarz, Baruch B ^a   Asterhan, Christa S C ^a   Gil, Julia ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN GUIDANCE; LEARNING TASKS;

COMMUNICATION;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84858407425     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Andriessen, J. E. B., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.). (2003). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). The role of argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialogue. To appear in Cognitive Science.
3. Asterhan, C. S. C. Schwarz, B. B. & Gil, J. (2008). E-moderation of synchronous argumentative discussions: First findings from multiple sources. Paper submitted for publication.
4. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193. (Pubitemid 127107956)
5. Condon, S. L. & Cech, C. G. (1996). Discourse Management Strategies in Face-To-Face and Computer- Mediated Decision Making Interactions. Electronic Journal of Communication/La revue électronique de communication 6(3).
6. De Laat, M.F., Lally, V., Lipponen, L. & Simons, P. R. J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher . Instructional Science, 35(3).
7. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
8. Gil, J., Schwarz, B. B. & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2007). Intuitive moderation styles and beliefs of teachers in CSCLbased argumentation. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference. Rutgers University.
9. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 433-475.
10. Herring, S. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton (Eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
11. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315. (Pubitemid 127341610)
12. Lund, K. (2004). Human support in CSCL: what, for whom and by whom? In J-W. Strijbos, P.A. Kirshner, R. L. Martens, & P. Dillenbourg (Eds), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education, CSCL Vol. 3 (167-198). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (1996). Communities of practice toward expertise: Social foundation of university instruction. In P. B. Baltes & U. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds. Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 394-411). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
14. Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29, 127-153.
15. Miller, P. H. (2005). Gender and Information Technology: Perspectives from Human Cognitive Development. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 26(1), 148-167. (Pubitemid 40882642)
16. Murray, D.E. (1989). When the Medium Determines Turns: Turn-taking in Computer Conversation. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Working with Language (pp. 251-266). Mouton de Gruyter, New York.
17. Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 151-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. Special Issue: Computer support for collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 285-299.
19. Reiser, B. J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community - CSCL 2002 (pp. 255-264). Boulder, CO: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive Development in social context. NY: Oxford University Press.
21. Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford University Press.
22. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Archer, W., & Garrison, R. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous computer conferencing transcripts. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
23. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Schwarz, B. B., & De Groot, R. (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 297-313.
25. Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A. (2007). The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools. The International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 449-478.
26. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y. & Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity: An empirical study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 221-258.
27. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage
28. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Toronto, ON: Wiley.
29. Suthers, D. D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments (pp. 27-46). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 485-521.
31. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research 23(1), 3-43.
32. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30. (Pubitemid 40317592)
33. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95. (Pubitemid 41562938)
34. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: Scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 717-726). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.