Protein deposition on contact lenses: The past, the present, and the future

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 53-64

  Luensmann, Doerte ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Contact lens; Hydrogel; PolyHEMA; Protein deposition; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

1 VINYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; ALBUMIN; ASMOFILCON A; BALAFILCON A; BIOMATERIAL; COMFILCON A; ENFILCON A; FILCON II 3; GALYFILCON A; LACTOFERRIN; LOTRAFILCON A; LOTRAFILCON B; LYSOZYME; METHACRYLIC ACID; NARAFILCON; POLYMACON; SENOFILCON A; SIFILCON A; SILICONE GEL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTACT LENS; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; HYDROPHOBICITY; LENS IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEPOSITION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; REVIEW; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATIC ELECTRICITY; TEAR FILM; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ADSORPTION; CONTACT LENSES; EYE PROTEINS; HUMANS; TEARS;

EID: 84857801096     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: 14765411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2011.12.005     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Franklin V.J. Cleaning efficacy of single-purpose surfactant cleaners and multi-purpose solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1997, 20:63-68.
2. Jung J., Rapp J. The efficacy of hydrophilic contact lens cleaning systems in removing protein deposits. CLAO J 1993, 19:47-49.
3. Luensmann D., Heynen M., Liu L., Sheardown H., Jones L. The efficiency of contact lens care regimens on protein removal from hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses. Mol Vis 2010, 16:79-92.
4. Taylor R.L., Willcox M.D., Williams T.J., Verran J. Modulation of bacterial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin. Optom Vis Sci 1998, 75:23-29.
5. Santos L., Rodrigues D., Lira M., Real Oliveira M.E., Oliveira R., Vilar E.Y., et al. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2008, 85:520-525.
6. Miller M.J., Wilson L.A., Ahearn D.G. Effects of protein, mucin, and human tears on adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrophilic contact lenses. J Clin Microbiol 1988, 26:513-517.
7. Tan M.E., Demirci G., Pearce D., Jalbert I., Sankaridurg P., Willcox M.D. Contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis is associated with increased albumin deposits on extended wear hydrogel lenses. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002, 506:951-955.
8. Green-Church K.B., Nichols K.K., Kleinholz N.M., Zhang L., Nichols J.J. Investigation of the human tear film proteome using multiple proteomic approaches. Mol Vis 2008, 14:456-470.
9. de Souza G.A., Godoy L.M., Mann M. Identification of 491 proteins in the tear fluid proteome reveals a large number of proteases and protease inhibitors. Genome Biol 2006, 7:R72.
10. Zydney A.L. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration: principles and applications 1996, 618. Marcel Dekker, New York. L.J. Zeman, A.L. Zydney (Eds.).
11. Nuyken O., Billig-Peters W., Frasch T. Polystyrenes and other aromatic poly(vinyl compound)s. Handbook of polymer synthesis 2005, 73-150. Marcel Dekker, New York. 2nd ed. H.R. Kricheldorf, O. Nuyken, G. Swift (Eds.).
12. Bajpai A.K., Mishra D.D. Adsorption of a blood protein on to hydrophilic sponges based on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004, 15:583-592.
13. Bright A.M., Tighe B.J. The composition and interfacial properties of tears, tear substitutes and tear models. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1993, 16:57-66.
14. Ng V., Cho P., Mak S., Lee A. Variability of tear protein levels in normal young adults: between-day variation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000, 238:892-899.
15. Sack R.A., Tan K.O., Tan A. Diurnal tear cycle: evidence for a nocturnal inflammatory constitutive tear fluid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992, 33:626-640.
16. Farris R.L. Tear analysis in contact lens wearers. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1985, 83:501-545.
17. McGill J.I., Liakos G.M., Goulding N., Seal D.V. Normal tear protein profiles and age-related changes. Br J Ophthalmol 1984, 68:316-320.
18. Mandel I.D., Stuchell R.N. The lacrimal-salivary axis in health and disease. The preocular tear film in health, disease, and contact lens wear 1986, 852-856. Lubbock, Dry Eye Institute, Inc., Texas. F.J. Holly, D.W. Lamberts, D.L. MacKeen (Eds.).
19. Fullard R.J., Tucker D.L. Changes in human tear protein levels with progressively increasing stimulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991, 32:2290-2301.
20. Vadgama P. Surfaces and interfaces for biomaterials 2005, CRC Press/Woodhead, Boca Raton, FL.
21. Voet D., Voet J.G. Three-dimensional structures of proteins. Biochemistry 2004, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, p. 219-75. 3rd ed.
22. Norde W. Energy and entropy of protein adsorption. J Dispersion Sci Technol 1992, 13:363-377.
23. Roach P., Farrar D., Perry C.C. Interpretation of protein adsorption: surface-induced conformational changes. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127:8168-8173.
24. Lindgren M., Sorgjerd K., Hammarstrom P. Detection and characterization of aggregates, prefibrillar amyloidogenic oligomers, and protofibrils using fluorescence spectroscopy. Biophys J 2005, 88:4200-4212.
25. Allansmith M.R., Korb D.R., Greiner J.V., Henriquez A.S., Simon M.A., Finnemore V.M. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1977, 83:697-708.
26. Brennan N.A., Coles M.L. Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens wear. Int Contact Lens Clin 2000, 27:75-100.
27. Rudko P, Proby JA. A method for classifying and describing protein deposition on hydrophilic lenses. Allergan pharmaceutical report; 1974, Series 94.
28. Minno G.E., Eckel L., Groemminger S., Minno B., Wrzosek T. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses. I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991, 68:865-872.
29. Myers R.I., Larsen D.W., Tsao M., Castellano C., Becherer L.D., Fontana F., et al. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits. Optom Vis Sci 1991, 68:776-782.
30. Wedler F.C. Analysis of biomaterials deposited on soft contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 1977, 11:525-535.
31. Keith D., Hong B., Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res 1997, 16:503-510.
32. Yan G., Nyquist G., Caldwell K.D., Payor R., McCraw E.C. Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993, 34:1804-1813.
33. Subbaraman L.N., Glasier M.A., Sheardown H., Jones L. Efficacy of an extraction solvent used to quantify albumin deposition on hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2009, 35:76-80.
34. Minarik L., Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989, 15:185-188.
35. Zhang S., Borazjani R.N., Salamone J.C., Ahearn D.G., Crow S.A., Pierce G.E. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2005, 28:113-119.
36. Boone A., Heynen M., Joyce E., Varikooty J., Jones L. Ex vivo protein deposition on bi-weekly silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2009, 86:1241-1249.
37. Keith D.J., Christensen M.T., Barry J.R., Stein J.M. Determination of the lysozyme deposit curve in soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003, 29:79-82.
38. Senchyna M., Jones L., Louie D., May C., Forbes I., Glasier M.A. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004, 28:25-36.
39. Suwala M., Glasier M.A., Subbaraman L.N., Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007, 33:138-143.
40. Glasier M.A., Keech A., Sheardown H., Subbaraman L.N., Jones L. Conformational and quantitative characterization of lysozyme extracted from galyfilcon and senofilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2008, 33:1-11.
41. Ratner B.D., Horbett T.A., Mateo N.B. Contact lens spoilation. Part 1. Biochemical aspect of lens spoilation. Contact lens practice 1994, 1083-1098. Chapman & Hall, London. 1st ed. M. Ruben, M. Guillon (Eds.).
42. Jones L., Evans K., Sariri R., Franklin V., Tighe B. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing Group II and Group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997, 23:122-126.
43. Miller B. Observations of deposits on soft contact lenses by different methods of light microscopy, scanning microscopy, and electron microprobe analysis. Int Contact Lens Clin 1980, 3-4:22-35.
44. Tripathi R.C., Tripathi B.J., Ruben M. The pathology of soft contact lens spoilage. Ophthalmology 1980, 87:365-380.
45. Bilbaut T., Gachon A.M., Dastugue B. Deposits on soft contact lenses. Electrophoresis and scanning electron microscopic examinations. Exp Eye Res 1986, 43:153-165.
46. Versura P., Maltarello M.C., Roomans G.M., Caramazza R., Laschi R. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray microanalysis and immunohistochemistry on worn soft contact lenses. Scanning Microsc 1988, 2:397-410.
47. Braga P.C., Ricci D. Atomic force microscopy: biomedical methods and applications 2004, Humana Press, Totowa.
48. Teichroeb J.H., Forrest J.A., Ngai V., Martin J.W., Jones L., Medley J. Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2008, 85:1151-1164.
49. Lira M., Santos L., Azeredo J., Yebra-Pimentel E., Oliveira M.E. Comparative study of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses surfaces before and after wear using atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2008, 85:361-367.
50. Rebeix V., Sommer F., Marchin B., Baude D., Tran M.D. Artificial tear adsorption on soft contact lenses: methods to test surfactant efficacy. Biomaterials 2000, 21:1197-1205.
51. Meadows D.L., Paugh J.R. Use of confocal microscopy to determine matrix and surface protein deposition profiles in hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J 1994, 20:237-241.
52. Luensmann D., Glasier M.A., Zhang F., Bantseev V., Simpson T., Jones L. Confocal microscopy and albumin penetration into contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007, 84:839-847.
53. Castillo E.J., Koenig J.L., Anderson J.M. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. IV. Comparison of in vivo spoilage with the in vitro adsorption of tear proteins. Biomaterials 1986, 7:89-96.
54. Hart D.E., DePaolis M., Ratner B.D., Mateo N.B. Surface analysis of hydrogel contact lenses by ESCA. CLAO J 1993, 19:169-173.
55. Zhao Z., Wei X., Aliwarga Y., Carnt N.A., Garrett Q., Willcox M.D. Proteomic analysis of protein deposits on worn daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Mol Vis 2008, 14:2016-2024.
56. Kingshott P., St John H.A., Chatelier R.C., Griesser H.J. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry detection of proteins adsorbed in vivo onto contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 2000, 49:36-42.
57. Holmberg M., Hou X. Competitive protein adsorption - multilayer adsorption and surface induced protein aggregation. Langmuir 2009, 25:2081-2089.
58. Garrett Q., Laycock B., Garrett R.W. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000, 41:1687-1695.
59. Garrett Q., Griesser H.J., Milthorpe B.K., Garrett R.W. Irreversible adsorption of human serum albumin to hydrogel contact lenses: a study using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Biomaterials 1999, 20:1345-1356.
60. Hoffman A.S. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002, 54:3-12.
61. Peppas N.A., Huang Y., Torres-Lugo M., Ward J.H., Zhang J. Physicochemical foundations and structural design of hydrogels in medicine and biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000, 2:9-29.
62. Kopecek J. Hydrogels from soft contact lenses and implants to self-assembled nanomaterials. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 2009, 47:5929-5946.
63. Tighe B. Contact lens materials. Contact lenses 2007, 59-78. Butterworth-Heinemann, Edinburgh. 5th ed. A. Phillips, L. Speedwell (Eds.).
64. Nicolson P.C., Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001, 22:3273-3283.
65. Morgan P.B., Woods C., Tranoudis I.G., Helland M., Efron N., Knajian R., et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2009. Contact Lens Spectrum 2010, 25:30-53.
66. Bohnert J.L., Horbett T.A., Ratner B.D., Royce F.H. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988, 29:362-373.
67. Leahy C.D., Mandell R.B., Lin S.T. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990, 67:504-511.
68. Lin S.T., Mandell R.B., Leahy C.D., Newell J.O. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991, 17:44-50.
69. Castillo E.J., Koenig J.L., Anderson J.M., Lo J. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. I. Conformational changes of adsorbed human serum albumin. Biomaterials 1984, 5:319-325.
70. Castillo E.J., Koenig J.L., Anderson J.M., Lo J. Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1985, 6:338-345.
71. Mochizuki H., Yamada M., Hatou S., Kawashima M., Hata S. Deposition of lipid, protein, and secretory phospholipase A2 on hydrophilic contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2008, 34:46-49.
72. Subbaraman L.N., Glasier M.A., Senchyna M., Sheardown H., Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006, 31:787-796.
73. Okada E., Matsuda T., Yokoyama T., Okuda K. Lysozyme penetration in Group IV soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2006, 32:174-177.
74. Garrett Q., Garrett R.W., Milthorpe B.K. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999, 40:897-903.
75. Maissa C., Franklin V., Guillon M., Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1998, 75:697-705.
76. Jones L., Senchyna M., Glasier M.A., Schickler J., Forbes I., Louie D., et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003, 29:75-79.
77. Caron P., St-Jacques J., Michaud L. Clinical discussion on the relative efficacy of 2 surfactant-containing lubricating agents in removing proteins during contact lens wear. Optometry 2007, 78:23-29.
78. Jones L., Mann A., Evans K., Franklin V., Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on Group II and Group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000, 77:503-510.
79. Chow L.M., Subbaraman L.N., Sheardown H., Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA Group II and Group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009, 20:71-82.
80. Luensmann D., Zhang F., Subbaraman L.N., Sheardown H., Jones L. Localization of lysozyme sorption to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using confocal microscopy. Curr Eye Res 2009, 34:683-697.
81. Rovira-Bru M., Giralt F., Cohen Y. Protein adsorption onto zirconia modified with terminally grafted polyvinylpyrrolidone. J Colloid Interface Sci 2001, 235:70-79.
82. Lord M.S., Stenzel M.H., Simmons A., Milthorpe B.K. The effect of charged groups on protein interactions with poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2006, 27:567-575.
83. Jones L., Franklin V., Evans K., Sariri R., Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly Group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996, 73:16-21.
84. Baines M.G., Cai F., Backman H.A. Adsorption and removal of protein bound to hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990, 67:807-810.
85. Sack R.A., Jones B., Antignani A., Libow R., Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987, 28:842-849.
86. Rogers R. In vitro and ex vivo wettability of hydrogel contact lenses 2006, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont.
87. Lorentz H., Jones L. Lipid deposition on hydrogel contact lenses: how history can help us today. Optom Vis Sci 2007, 84:286-295.
88. Nicolson PC, Baron RC, Chabrecek P, Court J, Domschke A, Griesser HJ, et al. Extended wear ophthalmic lens. US Patent No. 5760100; 1998.
89. Grobe G.L., Kunzler J., Seelye D., Salamone J. Silicone hydrogels for contact lens applications. Polym Mater Sci Eng 1999, 80:108-109.
90. Yasuda H. Biocompatibility of nanofilm-encapsulated silicone and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Macromol Biosci 2006, 6:121-138.
91. Weikart C.M., Matsuzawa Y., Winterton L., Yasuda H.K. Evaluation of plasma polymer-coated contact lenses by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 2001, 54:597-607.
92. Zhao Z., Carnt N.A., Aliwarga Y., Wei X., Naduvilath T., Garrett Q., et al. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition. Optom Vis Sci 2009, 86:251-259.
93. Subbaraman L., Glasier M.A., Dumbleton K., Jones L. Quantification of protein deposition on five commercially available silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2007, 84. E-abstract 070031.
94. Lopez-Alemany A., Compan V., Refojo M.F. Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 2002, 63:319-325.
95. Green-Church K.B., Nichols J.J. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition. Mol Vis 2008, 14:291-297.
96. Pucker A.D., Nichols J.J. Impact of a rinse step on protein removal from silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2009, 86:943-947.
97. Powell DR, Thangavelu M, Nichols JJ. Comparison of pooled and non-pooled extracted tear protein profiles from silicone hydrogel lenses. ARVO. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010.
98. Subbaraman L.N., Woods J., Teichroeb J.H., Jones L. Protein deposition on a lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 2009, 86:244-250.
99. Jones L. Contact lens materials: A new silicone hydrogel comes to market. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007, 22:23.
100. Steffen R., McCabe K. Finding the comfort zone. Contact Lens Spectrum 2004, 13:3.
101. Steffen R., Schnider C. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1 - Material properties. Optician 2004, 227:23-25.
102. McCabe K.P., Molock F.F., Hill G.A., Alli A., Steffen R.B., Vanderlaan D.G., et al. Biomedical devices containing internal wetting agents 2005.
103. Riley C., Young G., Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens 2006, 32:281-286.
104. Brennan N.A., Coles M.L., Ang J.H. An evaluation of silicone-hydrogel lenses worn on a daily wear basis. Clin Exp Optom 2006, 89:18-25.
105. Tighe B. Trends Dev Silicone Hydrogel Mater 2006, http://www.siliconehydrogels.com/.
106. Jones L., Glasier M.A., Boone A., Keir N., Dumbleton K. Protein deposition on continuous wear surface modified (balafilcon A) and non-surface modified (comfilcon A) silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. AAO: Opt Vis Sci 2007, 84. E-abstract 075139.
107. Fonn D., Bruce A.S. A review of the Holden-Mertz criteria for critical oxygen transmission. Eye Contact Lens 2005, 31:247-251.
108. Szczotka-Flynn L., Diaz M. Risk of corneal inflammatory events with silicone hydrogel and low dk hydrogel extended contact lens wear: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2007, 84:247-256.
109. Jordan S.W., Chaikof E.L. Novel thromboresistant materials. J Vasc Surg 2007, 45(Suppl A):A104-A115.
110. Hayward J.A., Chapman D. Biomembrane surfaces as models for polymer design: the potential for haemocompatibility. Biomaterials 1984, 5:135-142.
111. Rose S.F., Lewis A.L., Hanlon G.W., Lloyd A.W. Biological responses to cationically charged phosphorylcholine-based materials in vitro. Biomaterials 2004, 25:5125-5135.
112. Ishihara K., Nomura H., Mihara T., Kurita K., Iwasaki Y., Nakabayashi N. Why do phospholipid polymers reduce protein adsorption. J Biomed Mater Res 1998, 39:323-330.
113. Keith E.O., Chandrasekaran N.S., Sjolanki D.H., SDesai S.S., Janoff A.M. Adhesion of lysozyme and transferrin to omafilcon A contact lenses. Annual Meeting of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 2009.
114. Iwasaki Y., Ishihara K. Phosphorylcholine-containing polymers for biomedical applications. Anal Bioanal Chem 2005, 381:534-546.
115. Abraham S., Brahim S., Ishihara K., Guiseppi-Elie A. Molecularly engineered p(HEMA)-based hydrogels for implant biochip biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2005, 26:4767-4778.
116. Shimizu T., Goda T., Minoura N., Takai M., Ishihara K. Super-hydrophilic silicone hydrogels with interpenetrating poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) networks. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3274-3280.
117. Goda T., Matsuno R., Konno T., Takai M., Ishihara K. Protein adsorption resistance and oxygen permeability of chemically crosslinked phospholipid polymer hydrogel for ophthalmologic biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2009, 89:184-190.
118. Atala A., Lanza R., Thomson J., Nerem R. Principles of regenerative medicine 2008, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam/Boston, p. 579-742. 1st ed.
119. Scott E.A., Nichols M.D., Cordova L.H., George B.J., Jun Y.S., Elbert D.L. Protein adsorption and cell adhesion on nanoscale bioactive coatings formed from poly(ethylene glycol) and albumin microgels. Biomaterials 2008, 29:4481-4493.
120. Thissen H., Gengenbach T., du Toit R., Sweeney D.F., Kingshott P., Griesser H.J., et al. Clinical observations of biofouling on PEO coated silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5510-5519.
121. Van Beek M., Jones L., Sheardown H. Hyaluronic acid containing hydrogels for the reduction of protein adsorption. Biomaterials 2008, 29:780-789.
122. van Beek M., Weeks A., Jones L., Sheardown H. Immobilized hyaluronic acid containing model silicone hydrogels reduce protein adsorption. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2008, 19:1425-1436.
123. Cassinelli C., Morra M., Pavesio A., Renier D. Evaluation of interfacial properties of hyaluronan coated poly(methylmethacrylate) intraocular lenses. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2000, 11:961-977.
124. Chan G.Y., Hughes T.C., McLean K.M., McFarland G.A., Nguyen X., Wilkie J.S., et al. Approaches to improving the biocompatibility of porous perfluoropolyethers for ophthalmic applications. Biomaterials 2006, 27:1287-1295.
125. Kita M., Ogura Y., Honda Y., Hyon S.H., Cha W., Ikada Y. Evaluation of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel as a soft contact lens material. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1990, 228:533-537.
126. Sick P.B., Gelbrich G., Kalnins U., Erglis A., Bonan R., Aengevaeren W., et al. Comparison of early and late results of a carbofilm-coated stent versus a pure high-grade stainless steel stent (the Carbostent-Trial). Am J Cardiol 2004, 93:1351-1356. A5.
127. Willcox M.D., Hume E.B., Aliwarga Y., Kumar N., Cole N. A novel cationic-peptide coating for the prevention of microbial colonization on contact lenses. J Appl Microbiol 2008, 105:1817-1825.
128. Zhang J, Hodge WG. Contact lens integrated with a biosensor for the detection of glucose and other components in tears. US Patent No. 20100113901; 2010.
129. Christensen B., Lebow K., White E.M., Cedrone R., Bevington R. Effectiveness of citrate-containing cens care regimens: A controlled clinical comparison. ICLC 1998, 25:50-58.
130. Zhao Z., Naduvilath T., Flanagan J.L., Carnt N.A., Wei X., Diec J., et al. Contact lens deposits, adverse responses, and clinical ocular surface parameters. Optom Vis Sci 2010, 87:669-674.
131. Nash WL, Amos CF, Carney FP. Factors that influence the adsorption of protein and lipid to silicone hydrogel lenses after 2 weeks of daily wear. ARVO, Fort Lauderdale. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007.
132. Pearce D., Tan M.E., Demirci G., Willcox M.D. Surface protein profile of extended-wear silicon hydrogel lenses. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002, 506:957-960.
133. Powell CH, Hoong LD, Huth SW. Lipid and protein removal from a silicone hydrogel lens (lotrafilcon A) by a rub versus a no-rub multipurpose solutionusing infrared analysis of clinically worn lenses. ARVO, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009.
134. Luensmann D., Jones L. Impact of fluorescent probes on albumin sorption profiles to ophthalmic biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010, 94:327-336.