Biological responses to cationically charged phosphorylcholine-based materials in vitro

Biomaterials

Volumn 25, Issue 21, 2004, Pages 5125-5135

  Rose, Susanna F ^a   Lewis, Andrew L ^b   Hanlon, Geoffrey W ^a   Lloyd, Andrew W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^b BIOCOMPATIBLES UK LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Cytotoxicity; Inflammatory response; Phosphorylcholine; Protein adsorption

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ADSORPTION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELLS; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; ORGANIC POLYMERS; PROTEINS;

HOST INTERACTION; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE;

BIOMATERIALS;

CATION; MONOMER; PHOSPHORYLCHOLINE; POLYMER; PROTEIN;

ADSORPTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL ADHESION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CYTOTOXICITY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GRANULOCYTE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INFLAMMATORY CELL; MATERIAL COATING; MONONUCLEAR CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SURFACE CHARGE;

3T3 CELLS; ADSORPTION; ANIMALS; BLOOD PROTEINS; CATIONS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIVISION; CELLS, CULTURED; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; ELECTROSTATICS; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; GRANULOCYTES; HUMANS; MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION; MACROPHAGES; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; PHOSPHORYLCHOLINE; PROTEIN BINDING; RABBITS;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 1942486841     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Lloyd A.W. Interfacial bioengineering to enhance surface biocompatibility. Med Dev Technol. 13:2002;18-21.
2. Marotta J.S., Widenhouse C.W., Habal M.B., Goldberg E.P. Silicone gel breast implant failure and frequency of additional surgeries; analysis of 35 studies reporting examination of more than 8000 explants. J Biomed Mater Res. 48:1999;354-364.
3. Santavirta S., Takagi M., Gómez-Barrena E., Nevalainen J., Lassus J., Salo J., Konttinen Y.T. Studies of host response to orthopaedic implants and biomaterials. J Long-Term Effects Med Implants. 9:1999;67-76.
4. Campbell E.J., O'Byrne V., Stratford P.W., Vick T.A., Wiles M.C., Yianni Y.P. Biocompatible surfaces using methacryloylphosphorylcholine Laurylmethacrylate copolymer. Am Soc Artif Internal Organs. 40:1994;M853-M857.
5. Lewis A.L. Phosphorylcholine-based polymers and their use in the prevention of biofouling. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 18:2000;261-275.
6. Li Y.J., Matthews K.H., Chen T.M., Wang Y.F., Kodama M., Nakaya T. Novel blood-compatible polyurethanes containing poly(butadiene) soft segments and phosphatididylcholine analogues for biomedical applications. Chem Mater. 8:1996;1441-1450.
7. Barraud JE. An investigation into the biocompatibility of novel phosphorylcholine based materials, PhD thesis, 2001.
8. Lloyd A.W., Dropcova S., Faragher R.G.A., Gard P.R., Hanlon G.W., Mikalovsky S.V., Olliff C.J., Denyer S.P., Letko S.P., Filipec M. The development of in vitro biocompatibility tests for the evaluation of intraocular biomaterials. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 10:1999;621-627.
9. Lloyd A.W., Faragher R.G.A., Wassall M., Rhys-Williams W., Wong L., Hughes J.E., Hanlon G.W. Assessing the in vitro cell-based ocular compatibility of contact lens materials. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 23:2000;119-123.
10. Yu J., Lamba N.M.K., Courtney J.M., Whateley T.L., Gaylor J.D.S., Lowe G.D.O., Ishihara K., Nakabayashi N. Polymeric biomaterials; influence of phosphorylcholine polar groups on protein adsorption and complement activation. Int J Artif Organs. 17:1994;499-504.
11. Franklin V.J., Bright A.M., Tighe B. Hydrogel polymers and ocular spoilation processes. Trends Polym Sci. 1:1993;9-15.
12. Kunzler J.F., McGee J.A. Contact lens materials. Chem Industry. 16:1995;651-655.
13. Kouvroukoglou S., Dee K.C., Bizios R., McIntire L.V., Zygourakis K. Endothelial cell migration on surfaces modified with immobilized adhesion peptides. Biomaterials. 21:2000;1725-1733.
14. Kottke-Marchant K., Veenstra A.A., Marchant R.E. Human endothelial cell growth and coagulant function varies with respect to interfacial properties of polymeric substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 30:1996;209-220.
15. Poole-Warren L., Schindhelm K., Graham A.R., Slowiaczek P.R., Noble K.R. Performance of small diameter synthetic vascular prosthesis with confluent autologous endothelial cell linings. J Biomed Mater Res. 30:1996;221-229.
16. Kato K., Sano S., Ikada Y. Protein adsorption onto ionic surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 4:1995;221-230.
17. Kato K, Sano S, Ikada Y. Protein adsorption onto ionic surfaces. Biointerfaces 4:221-30.
18. Barbucci R., Magnani A. Conformation of human plasma protein at polymer surfaces. the effectiveness of surface heparinization Biomaterials. 15:1994;955-962.
19. Kishida A., Iwata H., Tamada Y., Ikada Y. Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces grafted with non-ionic and ionic monomers. Biomaterials. 12:1991;786-794.
20. van Wachem P.B., Hogt A.H., Beugeling T., Feijen J., Bantjes A., Detmers J.P., van Aken W.G. Adhesion of cultured human endothelial cells onto methacrylate polymers with varying surface wettability and charge. Biomaterials. 8:1987;323-328.
21. Bonfield T.L., Colton E., Anderson J.M. Plasma protein adsorbed biomedical polymers. J Biomed Mater Res. 23:1989;535-548.
22. Tang L., Eaton J.W. Mechanism of acute inflammatory response to biomaterials. Cells Mater. 4:1994;429-436.
23. Wesslén B., Kober M., Freij-Larsson C., Ljunghi A., Paulsson M. Protein adsorption of poly(etherurethane) surfaces modified by amphiphilic and hydrophilic polymers. Biomaterials. 15:1994;278-284.
24. Gristina A.G., Giridhar G., Gabriel B.L., Naylor P.T., Myrvik Q.N. Cell biology and molecular mechanisms in artificial device infections. Int J Artif Organs. 18(11):1993;755-764.
25. Elbert D.L., Hubbell J.A. Surface treatments of polymers for biocompatibility. Annu Rev Mater Sci. 26:1996;365-394.
26. Spargo B.J., Rudolph A.S., Rollwagen F.M. Recruitment of tissue resident cells to hydrogel composites. in vivo response to implant materials Biomaterials. 15:1994;853-858.
27. Bhardwaj R.S., Henze U., Klein G., Zwadlo-Klarwasser G., Klinge U., Mittermayer C.H., Klosterhalfen B. Monocyte-biomaterial interaction inducing phenotypic dynamics of monocytes. a possible role of monocyte subset in biocompatibility J Mater Sci Mater Med. 8:1997;737-742.
28. Anderson J.M. Inflammatory response to implants. Am Soc Artif Internal Organs. 11:1988;101-107.
29. ISO/TC194. Guidelines for basic biological tests of medical materials and devices. National Institute of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
30. Lewis AL, Berwick J, Davies MC, Roberts CJ, Wang J-H, Small S, Dunn A, O'Byrne V, Redman RP, Jones SA. Synthesis and characterisation of cationically modified phospholipid. Biomaterials, in press.
31. Palmer R, Lewis AL, Kirkwood LC, Rose SF, Lloyd AW, Stratford PW. Biological evaluation and drug delivery applications of cationically modified phospholipid polymers. Biomaterials, in press.
32. DeFife K.M., Yun J.K., Azeez A., Stack S., Ishihara K., Nakabayashi N., Colton E., Anderson J.M. Adhesion and cytokine production by monocytes on poly(2-methacryloxyethyl phosphorycholine-co-alkylmethacrylate)-coated polymers. J Biomed Mater Res. 29:1995;431-439.
33. Ishihara K., Ishikawa E., Iwasaki Y., Nakabayahsi N. Inhibition of fibroblast cell adhesion on substrate by coating with 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymers. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 10:1999;1047-1061.
34. Yung L.L., Cooper S.L. Neutrophil adhesion on phosphorylcholine- containing polyurethanes. Biomaterials. 10:1998;31-40.
35. Zheng J., Ito Y., Imanishi Y. Cell growth on immobilized cell-growth factor. Biomaterials. 15:1994;963-978.
36. Rainaldi G., Filippini P., Ferrante A., Indoaina P.L., Santini M.T. Fibronectin facilitates adhesion of K562 leukemic cells normally growing in suspension to cationic surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 55:2001;104-113.
37. Wahlgren M., Arnebrant T. Protein adsorption to solid surfaces. Trends Biotechnol. 9:1991;201-208.
38. Brown D.L., Phillips D.R., Damsky C.H., Charo I.F. Synthesis and expression of the fibroblast fibronectin receptor in human monocytes. J Clin Invest. 84:1989;366-370.
39. Horbett T.A., Waldburger B.D., Ratner B.D., Hoffman A.S. Cell adhesion to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers studied with a spinning disc apparatus. J Biomed Mater Res. 22:1988;383-404.
40. Hopp B., Kresz N., Kokavecz J., Smausz T., Schieferdecker H., Döring A., Marti O., Bor Z. Adhesive and morphological characteristics of surface chemically modified polytetrafluoroethylene films. Appl Surf Sci. 221:2004;437-443.
41. Dekker A, Beugeling T. Protein adsorption and the interaction of human endothelial cells with polymer surfaces. Modern aspects of protein adsorption on biomaterials. In: Missirlis YF, Lemm W, editors. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991.
42. Thapa A., Miller D.C., Webster T.J., Haberstroh K.M. Nano-structured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. Biomaterials. 24(17):2003;2915-2926.
43. Nicholov R., Lum N., Veregin R.P.N., DiCosmo P. Human serum-albumin adsorption at solid-liquid interface monitored by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Horbett T.A., Brash J.L. Proteins at Interfaces II: Fundamentals and Applications. 1995;280-295 American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
44. Yamakawa N., Tanaka T., Shigeta M., Hamano M., Usui M. Surface roughness of intraocular lenses and inflammatory cell adhesion to lens surfaces. J Cataract Refractive Surg. 29(2):2003;367-370.
45. Keogh J.R., Eaton J.W. Albumin binding surfaces for biomaterials. J Lab Clin Med. 124(4):1994;537-545.