Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses

CLAO Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 122-126

  Jones, Lyndon ^a   Evans, Kathryn ^a   Sariri, Reyhaneh ^a   Franklin, Valerie ^a   Tighe, Brian ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1 VINYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; EYE INFLAMMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; LIPID ANALYSIS; MALE; MATERIAL STATE; PAPILLARY CONJUNCTIVITIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY; WATER CONTENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; EYE PROTEINS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LIPID METABOLISM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PYRROLIDINONES; SPECTROMETRY, FLUORESCENCE;

EID: 0030900263     PISSN: 07338902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Grant T, Holden BA, Rechberger J, et al: Contact lens related papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC): Influence of protein accumulation and replacement frequency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;suppl 166:30.
2. Grant T, Kotow M, Holden BA: Hydrogel extended wear current performance and future options. Contax 1987;May:5-8.
3. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N: Visual decrement with deposit accumulation on HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937-941.
4. Baines MG, Cai F, Backman HA: Adsorption and removal of protein bound to hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:807-810.
5. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, et al: Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362-374.
6. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, et al: Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:842-849.
7. Minarik L, Rapp J: Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;15:185-188.
8. Leahy CD, Mandell RB, Lin ST: Initial in-vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:504-511.
9. Lin ST, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, et al: Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991;17:44-50.
10. Rapp J, Broich JR: Lipid deposits on worn soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1984;10:235-239.
11. Bontempo AR, Rapp J: Lipid deposits on hydrophilic and rigid gas permeable contact lenses. CLAO J 1994;20:242-245.
12. Bowers RWJ, Tighe BJ: Studies of the ocular compatibility of hydrogels. White spot deposits - chemical composition and geological arrangement of components. Biomaterials 1987;8:172-177.
13. Hart DE, Tidsale RR, Sack RA: Origin and composition of lipid deposits on soft contact lenses. Ophthalmology 1986;93:495-503.
14. Yan G, Nyquist G, Caldwell BCD, et al: Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1804-1813.
15. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, et al: The spoliation and clinical performance of monthly versus three monthly group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16-21.
16. Jones, L: Disposable contact lenses - a review of currently available systems. Optician 1995;209(5500):16-22.
17. Gasson A: Soft (hydrogel) lens fitting. In AJ Phillips, J Stone (Eds) Contact Lenses, 3rd Edition, London, Butterworths, 1989, pp382-439.
18. Abbott JM, Bowers RWJ, Franklin VJ, et al: Studies in the ocular compatibility of hydrogels (IV): Observations on the role of calcium in deposit formation. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1991;14:21-28.
19. Ohnishi ST, Barr JK: A simplified method of quantitating proteins using the biuret and phenol reagents. Anal Biochem 1978;86:193-199.
20. Sariri R: Tear protein interaction with hydrogel contact lenses. PhD Dissertation, Aston University, 1995.
21. Hu J, Tartaglia L, Kohler J, et al: Gentle Touch™, a lens material resistant to protein deposition. CLAO J 1995;21:93-95.
22. Baguet J, Claudon-Eyl V, Sommer F, et al: Normal tear protein and glycoprotein profiles of reflex tears and trace element composition of basal tears from heavy and slight deposits on soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1995;21:114-121.
23. Lever OW, Groemminger SF, Allen ME, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between total lens protein deposition and patient rated comfort of hydrophilic (soft) contact lenses. ICLC 1995;22:5-13.
24. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, et al: An in-vivo comparison of the deposition performance of high water content hydrogel contact lenses based on NVP and PVA hydrophiles. (Submitted for publication.)
25. Sasaki H, Kojima M, Mori Y, et al: Enhancing effect of pyrrolidone derivatives on transdermal penetration of 5-fluorouracil, triamcinolone acetonide, indomethacin and flurbiprofen. J Pharm Sci 1991;80:533-538.
26. Mirejovsky D, Patel AS, Rodriguez DD, et al. Lipid adsorption onto hydrogel contact lens materials. Advantages of nile red over oil red O in visualization of lipids. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:858-864
27. Tiffany JM: Individual variations in human meibomian lipid composition. Exp Eye Res 1978;27:289-300.
28. Hart DE, Lane BC, Josephson JE, et al: Spoilage of hydrogel contact lenses by lipid deposits Ophthalmol 1987;94:1315-1321.
29. Guillon M, Allary JC, Guillon JP, et al: Clinical management of regular replacement. Part 1: Selection of replacement frequency. ICLC 1992;19:104-120.
30. Bleshoy H, Guillon M, Shah D: Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics on replacement frequency. ICLC 1994;21:82-94.