Confocal microscopy and albumin penetration into contact lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 84, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 839-847

  Luensmann, Doerte ^a   Glasier, Mary Ann ^a   Zhang, Feng ^a   Bantseev, Vladimir ^a   Simpson, Trefford ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bovine serum albumin; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Contact lens; Etafilcon A; Lotrafilcon B; Protein penetration

Indexed keywords

CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; HYDROGELS; OPTOMETERS; POLYMERS; PROTEINS;

ALBUMIN PENETRATION; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN (BSA); CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY (CLSM); DEPTH OF PENETRATION; SILICONE HYDROGEL;

CONTACT LENSES;

ALBUMIN; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; POLYMACON; SILICON; SILOXANE;

ARTICLE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTACT LENS; HYDROGEL; IN VITRO SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

ADSORPTION; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; FLUORESCEINS; HYDROGEL; HYDROGELS; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; SERUM ALBUMIN, BOVINE; SILICONES;

EID: 34548662879     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181559ea4     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Dunn JP Jr, Weissman BA, Mondino BJ, Arnold AC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis associated with elevated corneal deposits. Cornea 1990;9:357-8.
2. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-7.
3. Skotnitsky CC, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: local and general. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:27-36.
4. Richard NR, Anderson JA, Tasevska ZG, Binder PS. Evaluation of tear protein deposits on contact lenses from patients with and without giant papillary conjunctivitis. CLAO J 1992;18:143-7.
5. Solomon OD, Freeman MI, Boshnick EL, Cannon WM, Dubow BW, Kame RT, Lanier JC Jr, Lopanik RW, Quinn TG, Rigel LE, Sherrill DD, Stiegmeier MJ, Teiche RS, Zigler LG, Mertz GW, Nason RJ. A 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lenses. CLAO J 1996;22:250-7.
6. Nason RJ, Boshnick EL, Cannon WM, Dubow BW, Freeman MI, Kame RT, Lanier JC Jr, Lopanik RW, Quinn TG Jr, Rigel LE, Sherrill DD, Solomon OD, Stiegemeier MJ, Teiche RS. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers. J Am Optom Assoc 1994;65:774-80.
7. Donshik PC. Contact lens chemistry and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S37-S39.
8. Minno GE, Eckel L, Groemminger S, Minno B, Wrzosek T. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses. I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:865-72.
9. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-S79.
10. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004; 28:25-36.
11. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Gepr S, Glasier MA, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:143-51.
12. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:209-14.
13. Tighe BJ, Bright AM. The composition and interfacial properties of tears, tear substitutes and tear models. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1993; 16:57-66.
14. Ng V, Cho P, Mak S, Lee A. Variability of tear protein levels in normal young adults: between-day variation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:892-9.
15. Choy CK, Cho P, Benzie IF, Ng V. Effect of one overnight wear of orthokeratology lenses on tear composition. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81: 414-20.
16. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362-73.
17. Garrett Q, Chatelier RC, Griesser HJ, Milthorpe BK. Effect of charged groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 1998;19:2175-86.
18. Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett RW. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41:1687-95.
19. Soltys-Robitaille CE, Ammon DM Jr, Valint PL Jr, Grobe GL III. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials 2001;22:3257-60.
20. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:897-903.
21. Vermeltfoort PB, Rustema-Abbing M, de Vries J, Bruinsma GM, Busscher HJ, van der Linden ML, Hooymans JM, van der Mei HC. Influence of day and night wear on surface properties of silicone hydrogel contact lenses and bacterial adhesion. Cornea 2006;25: 516-23.
22. Brennan NA, Coles ML. Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens wear. Int Contact Lens Clin 2000;27:75-100.
23. Jones L. A review of techniques for analysing hydrogel lens deposition. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1990;13:36-40.
24. Ratner B, Horbett T, Mateo N. Contact lens spoilation, Part 1: biochemical aspect of lens spoilation. In: Ruben M, Guillon M, eds. Contact Lens Practice. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994:1083-98.
25. Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ, Ruben M. The pathology of soft contact lens spoilage. Ophthalmology 1980;87:365-80.
26. Peters T Jr. All About Albumin: Biochemistry, Genetics, and Medical Applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
27. Bingaman S, Huxley VH, Rumbaut RE. Fluorescent dyes modify properties of proteins used in microvascular research. Microcirculation 2003;10:221-31.
28. Szewczyk B, Bienkowska-Szewczyk K, Kozloff LM. Use of different fluorochromes for monitoring protein elution and transfer. Electrophoresis 1987;8:25-8.
29. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68.
30. Peppas NA, ed. Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1986.
31. Peppas NA, Huang Y, Torres-Lugo M, Ward JH, Zhang J. Physicochemical foundations and structural design of hydrogels in medicine and biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000;2:9-29.
32. Hanson SR, Harker LA. Blood coagulation and blood-materials interactions. In: Ratner BD, ed. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996:193-9.
33. Pitt WG, Park K, Cooper SL. Sequential protein adsorption and thrombus deposition on polymeric biomaterials. J Colloid Interface Sci 1986;111:343-62.
34. Taylor RL, Willcox MD, Williams TJ, Verran J. Modulation of bacterial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:23-9.
35. Miller MJ, Wilson LA, Ahearn DG. Effects of protein, mucin, and human tears on adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrophilic contact lenses. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:513-17.
36. Bruinsma GM, Rustema-Abbing M, de Vries J, Stegenga B, van der Mei HC, van der Linden ML, Hooymans JM, Busscher HJ. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3646-53.
37. Refojo MF, Leong FL. Microscopic determination of the penetration of proteins and polysaccharides on polymer (hydroxyethylmethacrylate) similar hydrogels. J Polym Sci 1979;66:227-37.
38. Okada E, Matsuda T, Yokoyama T, Okuda K. Lysozyme penetration in group IV soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:174-7.
39. Bohnke M, Masters BR. Confocal microscopy of the cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res 1999;18:553-628.
40. Cavanagh HD, Jester JV, Essepian J, Shields W, Lemp MA. Confocal microscopy of the living eye. CLAO J 1990;16:65-73.
41. Jalbert I, Stapleton F, Papas E, Sweeney DF, Coroneo M. In vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87:225-36.
42. Masters BR, Bohnke M. Confocal microscopy of the human cornea in vivo. Int Ophthalmol 2001;23:199-206.
43. Petroll WM, Jester JV, Cavanagh HD. In vivo confocal imaging. Int Rev Exp Pathol 1996;36:93-129.
44. Shuman H, Murray JM, DiLullo C. Confocal microscopy: an overview. Biotechniques 1989;7:154-63.
45. Meadows DL, Paugh JR. Use of confocal microscopy to determine matrix and surface protein deposition profiles in hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J 1994;20:237-41.
46. Baines MG, Cai F, Backman HA. Adsorption and removal of protein bound to hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:807-10.
47. Gachon AM, Bilbault T, Dastugue B. Protein migration through hydrogels: a tool for measuring porosity - application to hydrogels used as contact lenses. Anal Biochem 1986;157:249-55.
48. Gatin E, Alexandreanu D, Popescu A, Berlic C, Alexandreanu I. Correlations between permeability properties and the pore - size distribution of the porous media "hydron" useful as contact lenses. Phys Med 2000;16:13-19.
49. Benchaib M, Delorme R, Pluvinage M, Bryon PA, Souchier C. Evaluation of five green fluorescence-emitting streptavidin-conjugated fluorochromes for use in immunofluorescence microscopy. Histochem Cell Biol 1996;106:253-6.