Ex vivo protein deposition on Bi-weekly silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1241-1249

  Boone, Adrienne ^a   Heynen, Miriam ^a   Joyce, Elizabeth ^a   Varikooty, Jalaiah ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Lysozyme; Protein activity; Protein deposition; Silicone hydrogel; Surface treatment

Indexed keywords

CIBA VISIONS; CROSS-OVER; EX-VIVO; LENS MATERIALS; LOW LEVEL; LYSOZYME; PROTEIN ACTIVITY; PROTEIN DEPOSITION; SILICONE HYDROGEL; SILICONE HYDROGELS; TOTAL PROTEIN;

CONTACT LENSES; DENATURATION; ENZYMES; HYDROGELS; MATERIALS; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS; SILICONES;

SURFACE TREATMENT;

LYSOZYME; PROTEIN; SILICONE;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EX VIVO STUDY; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; LENS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE CHARGE; TREATMENT DURATION;

CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EYE PROTEINS; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; HYDROGELS; MURAMIDASE; SILICONES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70449564918     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181bbc1b3     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogels: structure, properties and behaviour. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004:21-27.
2. Efron N, Morgan PB, Cameron ID, Brennan NA, Goodwin M. Oxygen permeability and water content of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:328-337
3. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, Efron N, Knajian R, Grupcheva CN, Jones D, Tan KO, Pesinova A, Ravn O, Santodomingo J, Vodnyanszky E, Montani G, Itoi M, Bendoriene J, van der Worp E, Helland M, Phillips G, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Radu S, Belousov V, Silih MS, Hsiao JC, Nichols JJ. International contact lens prescribing in 2008. Contact Lens Spectrum 2009;24:28-32.
4. Woods CA, Jones DA, Jones LW, Morgan PB. A seven year survey of the contact lens prescribing habits of Canadian optometrists. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:505-510
5. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Caffery B, Simpson T, DuToit R, Portello J, Davis L. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea 2001;20:610-618
6. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:157-162
7. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, Coleman S. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22: 516-527
8. Yung AM, Cho P, Yap M. A market survey of contact lens practice in Hong Kong. Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:165-175
9. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007;26:168-174
10. Papas E. On the relationship between soft contact lens oxygen transmissibility and induced limbal hyperaemia. Exp Eye Res 1998;67: 125-131
11. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Vascular re- sponse to extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:147-151
12. Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Holden BA. Microcyst response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:582-585
13. Fonn D, Sweeney D, Holden BA, Cavanagh D. Corneal oxygen deficiency. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:23-27
14. Sweeney D, du Toit R, Keay L, Jalbert I, Sankaridurg P, Stern J, Skotnitsky C, Stephensen A, Covey M, Holden B, Rao G. Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004:164-216.
15. Jones L, Dumbleton K. Soft lens extended wear and complications. In: Hom MM, Bruce AS, eds. Manual of Contact Lens Prescribing and Fitting, 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006: 393-441.
16. Court JL, Redman RP, Wang JH, Leppard SW, Obyrne VJ, Small SA, Lewis AL, Jones SA, Stratford PW. A novel phosphorylcholinecoated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials 2001;22: 3261-3272
17. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217-3224
18. Cheng L, Muller SJ, Radke CJ. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:93-108.
19. Rogers R, Jones LW. In vitro and ex vivo wettability of pHEMA and siloxane-based contact lens polymers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:E-abstract 918.
20. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB. In vitro water wettability of silicone hydrogel contact lenses determined using the sessile drop and captive bubble techniques. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;83:496-502.
21. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1996; 22:53-59
22. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937-941
23. Mondino BJ, Salamon SM, Zaidman GW. Allergic and toxic reactions of soft contact lens wearers. Surv Ophthalmol 1982;26:337-344
24. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly Group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16-21.
25. Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:503-510
26. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. IV. Comparison of in vivo spoilage with the in vitro adsorption of tear proteins. Biomaterials 1986;7: 89-96.
27. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:842-849
28. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:897-903.
29. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;15:185-188
30. Minno GE, Eckel L, Groemminger S, Minno B, Wrzosek T. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses. I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:865-872
31. Karageozian H. Use of the amino acid analyzer to illustrate the efficacy of an enzyme preparation for cleaning hydrophilic lenses. Contacto 1976;1:5-10.
32. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Lo J. Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1985;6:338-345
33. Furness EL, Ross A, Davis TP, King GC. A hydrophobic interaction site for lysozyme binding to polyethylene glycol and model contact lens polymers. Biomaterials 1998;19:1361-1369
34. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004; 28:25-36. (Pubitemid 38161171)
35. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-S79.
36. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:209-214
37. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138-143
38. McNally J, McKenney CD. A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17:38-41.
39. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Gepr S, Glasier MA, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:143-151
40. Gudmundsson OG, Woodward DF, Fowler SA, Allansmith MR. Identification of proteins in contact lens surface deposits by immunofluorescence microscopy. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:196-197
41. Allansmith MR. Giant papillary conjunctivitis. J Am Optom Assoc 1990;61:S42-S46.
42. Trocme SD, Kephart GM, Allansmith MR, Bourne WM, Gleich GJ. Conjunctival deposition of eosinophil granule major basic protein in vernal keratoconjunctivitis and contact lens-associated giant papillary conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108:57-63.
43. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-197
44. Skotnitsky CC, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: local and general. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:27-36.
45. Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Jalbert I. Adverse events and infections: which ones and how many? In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann; 2004:217-274
46. Dumbleton K. Noninflammatory silicone hydrogel contact lens complications. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S186-S189.
47. Jones L, Subbaraman LN, Rogers R, Dumbleton K. Surface treatment, wetting and modulus of silicone hydrogels. Optician 2006; 232:28-34. Available at: http://www.opticianonline.net/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID-2113. Accessed August 6, 2009.
48. Stapleton F, Stretton S, Papas E, Skotnitsky C, Sweeney DF. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the ocular surface. Ocul Surf 2006;4: 24-43.
49. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006;31:787-796
50. Glasier MA, Keech A, Sheardown H, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Conformational and quantitative characterization of lysozyme ex- tracted from galyfilcon and senofilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2008;33:1-11.
51. Pande SV, Murthy MS. A modified micro-Bradford procedure for elimination of interference from sodium dodecyl sulfate, other detergents, and lipids. Anal Biochem 1994;220:424-426
52. Zuo SS, Lundahl P. A micro-Bradford membrane protein assay. Anal Biochem 2000;284:162-164
53. Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Activity of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses as a function of time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:E-abstract 5393.
54. Shugar D. The measurement of lysozyme activity and the ultra-violet inactivation of lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1952;8:302-309
55. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Extraction efficiency of an extraction buffer used to quantify lysozyme deposition on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:169-173
56. Grobe G, Kunzler J, Seelye D, Salamone J. Silicone hydrogels for contact lens applications. Polym Mater Sci Eng 1999;80:108-109
57. Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001;22:3273-3283
58. Nicolson PC. Continuous wear contact lens surface chemistry and wearability. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S30-S32.
59. Maiden AC, Vanderlaan DG, Turner DC, Love RN, Ford JD, Molock FF, Steffen RB, Hill GA, Alli A, McCabe KP. Hydrogel with internal wetting agent. US Patent 6367929, April 9, 2002.
60. McCabe KP, Molock FF, Hill GA, Alli A, Steffen RB, Vanderlaan DG, Young KA, Ford JD. Biomedical devices containing internal wetting agents. US Patent 7052131, May 30, 2006.
61. Nicolson PC, Baron RC, Chabrecek P, Court J, Domschke A, Griesser HJ, Ho A, Hopken J, Laycock BG, Liu Q, Lohmann D, Meijs GF, Papas E, Riffle JS, Schindhelm K, Sweeney D, Terry WL Jr, Vogt J, Winterton LC. Extended wear ophthalmic lens. US Patent 5760100, June 2, 1998.
62. Weikart CM, Matsuzawa Y, Winterton L, Yasuda HK. Evaluation of plasma polymer-coated contact lenses by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:597-607.
63. Valint PL Jr, Grobe GL III, AmmonDMJr, Moorehead MJ. Plasma surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. US Patent 6193369, February 27, 2001.
64. Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:319-325
65. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Lopez-Alemany A, Almeida JB, Parafita MA, Refojo MF. Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:412-418
66. Steffen R, Schnider C. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1: material properties. Optician 2004;227:23-25
67. Steffen RB, McCabe KP. Finding the comfort zone with the newest silicone hydrogel technology. Contact Lens Spectrum 2004;13 (Suppl.):1-4.
68. Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:71-82.
69. Keith DJ, Christensen MT, Barry JR, Stein JM. Determination of the lysozyme deposit curve in soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29:79-82.
70. Donshik PC, Porazinski AD. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent- replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1999;97:205-216
71. Porazinski AD, Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. CLAO J 1999;25:142-147
72. Poggio EC, Abelson MB. Complications and symptoms with disposable daily wear contact lenses and conventional soft daily wear contact lenses. CLAO J 1993;19:95-102.
73. Luensmann D, Zhang F, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, Jones L. Location of lysozyme sorption to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using confocal microscopy. Curr Eye Res 2009;34: 683-697
74. Luensmann D, Glasier MA, Zhang F, Bantseev V, Simpson T, Jones L. Confocal microscopy and albumin penetration into contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:839-847
75. Santodomingo-Rubido J. The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide- vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007;27:168-173
76. Donshik P, Long B, Dillehay SM, Bergenske P, Barr JT, Secor G, Yoakum J, Chalmers RL. Inflammatory and mechanical complications associated with 3 years of up to 30 nights of continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33: 191-195
77. Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:697-705.
78. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77:503-510
79. Tighe BJ, Jones L, Evans K, Franklin V. Patient-dependent and material- dependent factors in contact lens deposition processes. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;438:745-751
80. Nichols JJ. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:751-757
81. Cheung SW, Cho P, Chan B, Choy C, Ng V. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel. Clin Exp Optom 2007;90:124-131
82. Ghormley NR, Jones L. Managing lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2006;21:21.