Protein deposition on a lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 244-250

  Subbaraman, Lakshman N ^a   Woods, Jill ^a   Teichroeb, Jonathan H ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Contact lens; Deposition; Lathe cut silicone hydrogel; Lysozyme activity; Tear protein

Indexed keywords

BRADFORD ASSAYS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONFORMATIONAL STATE; CONTACT LENS MATERIAL; LENS MATERIALS; LYSOZYME ACTIVITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEPOSITION; SILICONE HYDROGELS; TEAR PROTEIN; TOTAL PROTEIN; WESTERN BLOTTING;

COATED MATERIALS; CONTACT LENSES; ENZYMES; HYDROGELS; LATHES; SILICONES;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

LYSOZYME; PROTEIN; SILICONE; BIOMATERIAL; EYE PROTEIN; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; TREATMENT DURATION; WESTERN BLOTTING; ADOLESCENT; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; MIDDLE AGED; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EYE PROTEINS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MURAMIDASE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICONES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66149120311     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181981b54     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;15:185-8.
2. Minno GE, Eckel L, Groemminger S, Minno B, Wrzosek T. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:865-72.
3. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:842-9.
4. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:776-81.
5. Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:697-705.
6. Lin ST, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, Newell JO. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991;17:44-50.
7. Yan G, Nyquist G, Caldwell KD, Payor R, McCraw EC. Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1804-13.
8. Lord MS, Stenzel MH, Simmons A, Milthorpe BK. The effect of charged groups on protein interactions with poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2006;27:567-75.
9. Soltys-Robitaille CE, Ammon DM Jr, Valint PL Jr, Grobe GL III. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials 2001;22:3257-60.
10. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Lo J. Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1985;6:338-45.
11. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Lo J. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. I. Conformational changes of adsorbed human serum albumin. Biomaterials 1984;5:319-25.
12. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Jentoft N. Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. Biomaterials 1986;7:9-16.
13. Kaplan EN, Gundel RE. Anterior hydrogel lens deposits: polished vs. unpolished surfaces. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:201-3.
14. Fowler SA, Gaertner KL. Scanning electron microscopy of deposits remaining in soft contact lens polishing marks after cleaning. CLAO J 1990;16:214-8.
15. Green-Church KB, Nichols JJ. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition. Mol Vis 2008;14:291-7.
16. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-S79.
17. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:25-36.
18. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138-43.
19. Allansmith MR. Immunologic effects of extended-wear contact lenses. Ann Ophthalmol 1989;21:465-7, 474.
20. Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;83:697-708.
21. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-7.
22. Skotnitsky CC, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: local and general. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:27-36.
23. Jones L, Dumbleton K, Woods J. Fitting and evaluating a custom silicone hydrogel lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22(4):19.
24. Jones L, Dumbleton K, Woods J. Introducing a made-to-order silicone hydrogel lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22(2):23.
25. Jones L, Dumbleton K, Woods J. Fitting a challenging case with a custom silicone hydrogel. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22(10):17.
26. 2Optix Custom in a case of pediatric aphakia. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:E-abstract 075149.
27. McNally J, McKenney CD. A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17(1):38-41.
28. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:143-51.
29. Subbaraman LN, Glasier M, Dumbleton K, Jones L. Quantification of protein deposition on five commercially available silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:E-abstract 070031.
30. Pearce D, Tan ME, Demirci G, Willcox MD. Surface protein profile of extended-wear silicon hydrogel lenses. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506:957-60.
31. Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, Azeredo J. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:183-8.
32. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006;31:787-96.
33. Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:71-82.
34. Steffen R, Schnider CM. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1 - material properties. Optician 2004;227:23-5.
35. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Extraction efficiency of an extraction buffer used to quantify lysozyme deposition on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:169-73.
36. Zhang S, Borazjani RN, Salamone JC, Ahearn DG, Crow SA Jr, Pierce GE. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2005;28:113-9.
37. Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:503-10.
38. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:209-14.
39. Pande SV, Murthy MS. A modified micro-Bradford procedure for elimination of interference from sodium dodecyl sulfate, other detergents, and lipids. Anal Biochem 1994;220:424-6.
40. Zuo SS, Lundahl P. A micro-Bradford membrane protein assay. Anal Biochem 2000;284:162-4.
41. Teichroeb JH, Forrest JA, Ngai V, Martin JW, Jones L, Medley J. Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:1151-64.
42. Yasuda H. Luminous Chemical Vapor Deposition and Interface Engineering. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005.
43. Yasuda H. Biocompatibility of nanofilm-encapsulated silicone and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Macromol Biosci 2006;6:121-38.
44. Weikart CM, Matsuzawa Y, Winterton L, Yasuda HK. Evaluation of plasma polymer-coated contact lenses by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:597-607.
45. Nicolson PC, Baron RC, Chabrecek P, Court J, Domschke A, Griesser HJ, Ho A, Hopken J, Laycock BG, Liu Q, Lohmann D, Meijs GF, Papas E, Riffle JS, Schindheim K, Sweeney D, Terry WL Jr, Vogt J, Winterton LC, inventors; CIBA Vision; CSIRO, assignee. Extended wear ophthalmic lens. US patent 5760100. June 2, 1998.
46. Nicolson PC. Continuous wear contact lens surface chemistry and wearability. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S30-S32; discussion S57-S59, S192-S194.
47. Guryca V, Hobzova R, Pradny M, Sirc J, Michalek J. Surface morphology of contact lenses probed with microscopy techniques. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:215-22.
48. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Lopez-Alemany A, Almeida JB, Parafita MA, Refojo MF. Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:412-8.
49. Maldonado-Codina C, Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the surface characteristics of hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:396-404.
50. Baguet J, Sommer F, Duc TM. Imaging surfaces of hydrophilic contact lenses with the atomic force microscope. Biomaterials 1993;14:279-84.
51. Grobe GL III, Valint PL Jr, Ammon DM Jr. Surface chemical structure for soft contact lenses as a function of polymer processing. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:45-54.
52. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly Group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16-21.
53. Nichols JJ. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:751-7.
54. Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:120-4.
55. Ghormley N, Jones L. Managing lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2006;21(1):21.