Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials

Current Eye Research

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 787-796

  Subbaraman, Lakshman N ^a   Glasier, Mary Ann ^a   Senchyna, Michelle ^b   Sheardown, Heather ^c   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b ALCON RESEARCH LTD   (United States)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Contact lens; Deposition; Kinetics; Radiolabeled lysozyme; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

LYSOZYME; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); SILICONE;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; HYDROGEL; KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CONTACT LENSES; DEVICE APPROVAL; HYDROGEL; KINETICS; MURAMIDASE; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; PROTEIN BINDING; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 33750058566     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: 14602202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02713680600888799     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Baines MG, Cai F, Backman HA. Adsorption and removal of protein bound to hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:807-810.
2. Bohnert J, Horbett T, Ratner B, Royce F. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:362-373.
3. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J. 1989;15:185-188.
4. Minno GE, Eckel L, Groemminger S, et al. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: 1. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. 2. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:865-872.
5. Myers RI, Larsen DW, Tsao M, et al. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:776-782.
6. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, et al. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:842-849.
7. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:776-781.
8. Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, et al. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J. 1997;23:122-126.
9. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, et al. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:16-21.
10. Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:697-705.
11. Rapp J, Broich J. Lipid deposits on worn soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 1984;10:235-239.
12. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Jentoft N. Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. Biomaterials. 1986;7:9-16.
13. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65:937-941.
14. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 1996;22:53-59.
15. Bleshoy H, Guillon M, Shah D. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics on replacement frequency. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1994;21:82-94.
16. Refojo M, Holly F. Tear protein adsorption on hydrogels: a possible cause of contact lens allergy. Contact Intraoc Lens Med J. 1977;3:23-35.
17. Donshik PC. Contact lens chemistry and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:S37-39; discussion S57-39, S192-94.
18. Porazinski AD, Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. CLAO J. 1999;25:142-147.
19. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Comstock TL, Levy B. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1172-1177.
20. Nilsson SE. Seven-day extended wear and 30-day continuous wear of high oxygen transmissibility soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a randomized 1-year study of 504 patients. CLAO J. 2001;27:125-36.
21. Stern J, Wong R, Naduvilath TJ, et al. Comparison of the performance of 6 or 30 night extended wear schedules with silicone hydrogel lenses over 3 years. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:398-406.
22. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:S75-79; discussion S83-74, S192-194.
23. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, et al. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2004;28:25-36.
24. McNally J, McKenney C. A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2002:38-41.
25. Subbaraman LN, Glasier M, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:209-214.
26. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, et al. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:143-151.
27. Lin ST, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, Newell JO. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J. 1991;17:44-50.
28. Fowler SA, Korb DR, Allansmith MR. Deposits on soft contact lenses of various water contents. CLAO J. 1985;11:124-127.
29. Yan GY, Nyquist G, Caldwell KD, et al. Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1804-1813.
30. Lord MS, Stenzel MH, Simmons A, Milthorpe BK. The effect of charged groups on protein interactions with poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2006;27:567-575.
31. Soltys-Robitaille CE, Ammon DM, Jr., Valint PL, Jr., Grobe GL III. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3257-3260.
32. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:897-903.
33. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Lo J. Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials. 1985;6:338-345.
34. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Lo J. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. I. Conformational changes of adsorbed human serum albumin. Biomaterials. 1984;5:319-325.
35. Garrett Q, Milthorpe BK. Human serum albumin adsorption on hydrogel contact lenses in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2594-2602.
36. Gachon AM, Bilbaut T, Dastugue B. Adsorption of tear proteins on soft contact lenses. Exp Eye Res. 1985;40:105-116.
37. Kidane A, Szabocsik JM, Park K. Accelerated study on lysozyme deposition on poly(HEMA) contact lenses. Biomaterials. 1998;19:2051-2055.
38. Monfils J, Tasker H, Townley L, et al. Laboratory simulation of protein deposition of vifilcon and etafilcon soft contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(S):1292.
39. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, et al. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:503-510.
40. Alongi S, Rolando M, Marci A, et al. Bacterial load and protein deposits on 15 day versus 1 day disposable hydrophilic contact lenses. Cornea. 1998;17:146-151.
41. Keith DJ, Christensen MT, Barry JR, Stein JM. Determination of the lysozyme deposit curve in soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:79-82.
42. Leahy CD, Mandell RB, Lin ST. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:504-511.
43. Sack RA, Sathe S, Hackworth LA, et al. The effect of eye closure on protein and complement deposition on Group IV hydrogel contact lenses: relationship to tear flow dynamics. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:1092-1100.
44. Tripathi PC, Tripathi RC. Analysis of glycoprotein deposits on disposable soft contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:121-125.
45. Keith D, Christensen M, Tudor M. The effect of multi-purpose solutions on the lysozyme deposit curve with soft contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:s594.
46. Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:503-510.
47. Mirejovsky D, Patel AS, Rodriguez DD, Hunt TJ. Lipid adsorption onto hydrogel contact lens materials. Advantages of Nile red over oil red O in visualization of lipids. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:858-864.
48. 14C-lysozyme from simple and complex artificial tear solutions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;36:119-124.
49. Prager MD, Quintana RP. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. II. Lens uptake of cholesteryl oleate and dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;37:207-211.
50. Jung J, Rapp J. The efficacy of hydrophilic contact lens cleaning systems in removing protein deposits. CLAO J. 1993;19:47-49.
51. Boot N, Kok J, Kijlstra A. The role of tears in preventing protein deposition on contact lenses. Curr Eye Res. 1989;8:185-188.
52. Hong B, Bilbaut T, Chowhan M, et al. Cleaning capability of citratecontaining versus non-citrate contact lens cleaning solutions: an in vitro comparative study. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1994;21:237-240.
53. Ho C, Hlady V. Fluorescence assay for measuring lipid deposits on contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials. 1995;16:479-482.
54. Rebeix V, Sommer F, Marchin B, et al. Artificial tear adsorption on soft contact lenses: methods to test surfactant efficacy. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1197-1205.
55. Guerrieri A, Sabbatini L, Zambonin PG, et al. Effect of antidenaturant drugs on lysozyme deposit formation on soft contact lenses by liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection. Biomaterials. 1995;16:1025-1030.
56. Richard NR, Anderson JA, Tasevska ZG, Binder PS. Evaluation of tear protein deposits on contact lenses from patients with and without giant papillary conjunctivitis. CLAO J. 1992;18:143-147.
57. Versura P, Maltarello MC, Caramazza R, Laschi R. Immunocytochemical analysis of contact lens surface deposits in transmission electron microscopy. Curr Eye Res. 1988;7:277-286.
58. Wedler FC. Analysis of biomaterials deposited on soft contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1977;11:525-535.
59. Bardenstein DS, Sauer S, Szczotka L, Medof EM. Detection of complement regulatory proteins on soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:1270-1273.
60. Horbett TA, Weathersby PK. Adsorption of proteins from plasma to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers. I. Analysis with the in situ radioiodination technique. J Biomed Mater Res. 1981;15:403-423.
61. Weathersby PK, Horbett TA, Hoffman AS. A new method for analysis of the adsorbed plasma protein layer on biomaterial surfaces. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1976;22:242-252.
62. Chinn JA, Posso SE, Horbett TA, Ratner BD. Post-adsorptive transitions in fibrinogen adsorbed to polyurethanes: changes in antibody binding and sodium dodecyl sulfate elutability. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:757-778.
63. Uniyal S, Brash JL. Patterns of adsorption of proteins from human plasma onto foreign surfaces. Thromb Haemost. 1982;47:285-290.
64. 125I by the iodine monochloride method. Biochem J. 1971;121:139-143.
65. Regoeczi E. Iodine-labeled plasma proteins. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1984.
66. Horbett TA. Adsorption of proteins from plasma to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers. II. Compositional analysis with the prelabeled protein technique. J Biomed Mater Res. 1981;15:673-695.
67. Tighe BJ, Jones L, Evans K, Franklin V. Patient-dependent and material-dependent factors in contact lens deposition processes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;438:745-751.
68. Sariri R, Sabbaghzadeh R. Competitive adsorption of proteins on hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J. 2001;27:159-162.
69. Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett RW. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1687-1695.
70. Willis S, Court JL, Redman RP, et al. A novel phosphorylcholinecoated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3261-3272.
71. Young G, Bowers R, Hall B, Port M. Clinical comparison of Omafilcon A with four control materials. CLAO J. 1997;23:249-258.
72. Nicolson PC. Continuous wear contact lens surface chemistry and wearability. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:S30-32; discussion S57-39, S192-194.
73. Steffen R, Schnider CM. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1-Material properties. Optician. 2004;227:23-25.
74. Jones L, Long J, Chen P. The impact of contact lens care regimens on the in vitro wettability of conventional and silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; ARVO abstract #3097.
75. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3217-3224.
76. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials-how do they work? In: Sweeney D. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000:1-21.
77. Prime KL, Whitesides GM. Self-assembled organic monolayers: model systems for studying adsorption of proteins at surfaces. Science. 1991;252:1164-1167.
78. Andrade J. Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers. Vol. 1 and 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
79. Chen J, Dong D, Andrade J. Effect of reductive methylation on the adsorption of hen lysozyme. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1982;89:577-580.
80. Norde W, Lyklema J. Why proteins prefer interfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1991;2:183-202.
81. Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:319-325.
82. Yasuda H. Biocompatibility of nanofilm-encapsulated silicone and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Macromol Biosci. 2006;6:121-138.
83. Yasuda H. Luminous Chemical Vapor Deposition and Interface Engineering. Surfactant Science Series, Vol. 122. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005.
84. Hart DE, DePaolis M, Ratner BD, Mateo NB. Surface analysis of hydrogel contact lenses by ESCA. CLAO J. 1993;19:169-173.
85. Hart D, Lane B, Josephson J, et al. Spoilage of hydrogel contact lenses by lipid deposits-tear film potassium depression, fat, protein, and alcohol consumption. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:1315-321.