Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1151-1164

  Teichroeb, Jonathan H ^a   Forrest, James A ^a   Ngai, Valentina ^a   Martin, James W ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a   Medley, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Contact lens; Protein deposition; Scanning electron microscopy; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

AFM; CONTACT LENS MATERIAL; DILUTE MIXTURES; GOLD SPHERES; HYDROGEL CONTACT LENS; IN-SITU; IN-VITRO; LARGE AGGREGATES; LENS MATERIALS; LENS SURFACE; MONOLAYER FORMATION; PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL CONCENTRATIONS; POLY(2-HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYHEMA; PROTEIN DEPOSITION; SEM; SEM STUDY; SILICONE HYDROGEL; SILICONE HYDROGELS; SURFACE COMPOSITIONS;

AGGLOMERATION; ATOMS; CONTACT LENSES; DEPOSITS; ELECTRON MICROSCOPES; ENZYMES; GOLD DEPOSITS; HYDROGELS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MATERIALS; MONOLAYERS; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS; PROTEINS; SCANNING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SILICONES; SURFACES;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY;

ALBUMIN CONJUGATE; GOLD; LYSOZYME; POLYMACON; PROTEIN; SILICON; DRUG DERIVATIVE; POLY(2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE) POLYAMINE GRAFT COPOLYMER; POLY(2-HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE)-POLYAMINE GRAFT COPOLYMER; POLYAMINE; SILASTIC; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME LOCALIZATION; HYDROGEL; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; ADSORPTION; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; PERMEABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTROSCOPY; STANDARD; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADSORPTION; CONTACT LENSES; EQUIPMENT CONTAMINATION; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PERMEABILITY; POLYAMINES; POLYHYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EID: 59849125976     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818e8ad6     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Norde W, Lyklema J. Why proteins prefer interfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1991;2:183-202.
2. Norde W, Anusiem AC. Adsorption, desorption and readsorption of proteins on solid surfaces. Colloids Surf 1992;66:73-80.
3. Norde W. Adsorption of proteins at solid-liquid interfaces. Cell Mater 1995;5:97-112.
4. Andrade JD, Hlady V. Vroman effects, techniques, and philosophies. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1991;2:161-72.
5. Andrade JD. Needs, problems, and opportunities in biomaterials and biocompatibility. Clin Mater 1992;11:19-23.
6. Dupres V, Verbelen C, Dufrene YF. Probing molecular recognition sites on biosurfaces using AFM. Biomaterials 2007;28:2393-402.
7. Soni PS, Hathcoat G. Complications reported with hydrogel extended wear contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65: 545-51.
8. Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Vannas A, Nilsson KT, Efron N. Effects of long-term extended contact lens wear on the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:1489-501.
9. Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, Seddon JM, Shannon MJ, Scardino VA, Kenyon KR. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med 1989;321:779-83.
10. Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, Seddon JM, Kenyon KR. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. A case-control study. Microbial Keratitis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1989;321:773-8.
11. Cheng KH, Leung SL, Hoekman HW, Beekhuis WH, Mulder PG, Geerards AJ, Kijlstra A. Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity. Lancet 1999;354:181-5.
12. Tighe B. Contact lens materials. In: Phillips A, Speedwell L, eds. Contact Lenses, 5th ed. Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2007: 59-78.
13. Alvord L, Court J, Davis T, Morgan CF, Schindhelm K, Vogt J, Winterton L. Oxygen permeability of a new type of high Dk soft contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:30-6.
14. Compan V, Andrio A, Lopez-Alemany A, Riande E, Refojo MF. Oxygen permeability of hydrogel contact lenses with organosilicon moieties. Biomaterials 2002;23:2767-72.
15. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogels: structure, properties and behaviour. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004:1-27.
16. Jones L, Dumbleton K. Soft lens extended wear and complications. In: Hom MM, Bruce AS, eds. Manual of Contact Lens Prescribing and Fitting, 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier; 2006:393-441.
17. Morgan PB, Efron N. The oxygen performance of contemporary hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1998;21:3-6.
18. Efron N, Morgan PB, Cameron ID, Brennan NA, Goodwin M. Oxygen permeability and water content of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:328-37.
19. Papas EB, Vajdic CM, Austen R, Holden BA. High-oxygen-transmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:942-8.
20. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Changes in myopic refractive error with nine months' extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76:845-9.
21. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Vascular response to extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:147-51.
22. Dumbleton K. Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2002;25:137-46.
23. du Toit R, Simpson TL, Fonn D, Chalmers RL. Recovery from hyperemia after overnight wear of low and high transmissibility hydrogel lenses. Curr Eye Res 2001;22:68-73.
24. Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Holden BA. Microcyst response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:582-5.
25. Fonn D, du Toit R, Simpson TL, Vega JA, Situ P, Chalmers RL. Sympathetic swelling response of the control eye to soft lenses in the other eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:3116-21.
26. Covey M, Sweeney DF, Terry R, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA. Hypoxic effects on the anterior eye of high-Dk soft contact lens wearers are negligible. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:95-9.
27. Dumbleton K, Keir N, Moezzi A, Feng Y, Jones L, Fonn D. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:758-68.
28. Huth S, Wagner H. Identification and removal of deposits on poly-dimethylsiloxane silicone elastomer lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1981;8:19-26.
29. Rae ST, Huff JW. Studies on initiation of silicone elastomer lens adhesion in vitro: binding before the indentation ring. CLAO J 1991; 17:181-6.
30. Grobe G, Kunzler J, Seelye D, Salamone J. Silicone hydrogels for contact lens applications. Polym Mater Sci Eng 1999;80:108-9.
31. Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Bio-materials 2001;22:3273-83.
32. Nicolson PC. Continuous wear contact lens surface chemistry and wearability. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S30-2.
33. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Lopez-Alemany A, Almeida JB, Parafita MA, Refojo MF. Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:412-8.
34. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Lopez-Alemany A, Almeida JB, Parafita MA, Refojo MF. Microscopic observations of superficial ultrastructure of unworn siloxane-hydrogel contact lenses by cryo-scanning electron microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:419-23.
35. Jones L, Subbaraman LN, Rogers R, Dumbleton K. Surface treatment, wetting and modulus of silicone hydrogels. Optician 2006; 232:28-34. Available at: http://www.opticianonline.net/assets/ getAsset.aspx?ItemID = 2113. Accessed August 22, 2008.
36. Lira M, Santos L, Azeredo J, Yebra-Pimentel E, Oliveira ME. Comparative study of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses surfaces before and after wear using atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:361-7.
37. Nicolson PC, Baron RC, Chabrecek P, Court J, Domschke A, Griesser HJ, Ho A, Hopken J, Laycock BG, Liu Q Lohmann D, Meijs GF, Papas E, Riffle JS, Schindhelm K, Sweeney D, Terry WL Jr, Vogt J, Winterton LC Extended wear ophthalmic lens. US Patent 5,760,100. June 2, 1998.
38. Weikart CM, Matsuzawa Y, Winterton L, Yasuda HK. Evaluation of plasma polymer-coated contact lenses by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:597-607.
39. Valint PL Jr, Grobe GL III, Ammon DM Jr, Moorehead MJ. Plasma surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. US Patent 6,193,369. February 27, 2001.
40. Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of Pure-vision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:319-25.
41. Steffen R, Schnider C. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1: material properties. Optician 2004;227:23-5.
42. Steffen RB, McCabe KP. Finding the comfort zone. Contact Lens Spectrum 2004;13(Suppl.):1-4. Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/ article.aspx?article= 12543. Accessed August 22, 2008.
43. Jones L. Comfilcon A: a new silicone hydrogel material. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22:21. Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/ article.aspx?article = 100764. Accessed August 22, 2008.
44. Karlgard CC, Sarkar DK, Jones LJ, Moresoli C, Leung KT. Drying methods forXPS analysis of PureVision, Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. Appl Surf Sci 2004;230:106-14.
45. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Efron N, Canry JC Characterization of the surface of conventional hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:455-60.
46. Court JL, Redman RP, Wang JH, Leppard SW, Obyrne VJ, Small SA, Lewis AL, Jones SA, Stratford PW. A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials 2001;22: 3261-72.
47. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217-24.
48. Henriques M, Sousa C, Lira M, Elisabete M, Oliveira R, Azeredo J. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:446-50.
49. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB. In vitro water wettability of silicone hydrogel contact lenses determined using the sessile drop and captive bubble techniques. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;83:496-502.
50. Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, Azeredo J. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:183-8.
51. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:842-9.
52. Leahy CD, Mandell RB, Lin ST. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67: 504-11.
53. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362-73.
54. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77:503-10.
55. Garrett Q Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:897-903.
56. Garrett Q, Griesser HJ, Milthorpe BK, Garrett RW. Irreversible adsorption of human serum albumin to hydrogel contact lenses: a study using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Biomaterials 1999;20: 1345-56.
57. Garrett Q Laycock B, Garrett RW. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41:1687-95.
58. McNally J, McKenney CD. A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17:38-41. Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/article.aspx?article = 12085. Accessed August 22, 2008.
59. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-9.
60. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004; 28:25-36.
61. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:143-51.
62. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Extraction efficiency of an extraction buffer used to quantify lysozyme deposition on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:169-73.
63. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138-43.
64. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006;31:787-96.
65. Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:503-10.
66. Stathopulos PB, Scholz GA, Hwang YM, Rumfeldt JA, LepockJR Meiering EM. Sonication of proteins causes formation of aggregates that resemble amyloid. Protein Sci 2004;13:3017-27.
67. Gole A, Dash C, Soman C, Sainkar SR, Rao M, Sastry M. On the preparation, characterization, and enzymatic activity of fungal protease-gold colloid bioconjugates. Bioconjug Chem 2001;12:684-90.
68. Jurgens L, Nichtl A, Werner U. Electron density imaging of protein films on gold-particle surfaces with transmission electron microscopy. Cytometry 1999;37:87-92.
69. Hayat MA. Colloidal Gold: Principles, Methods and Applications, vol 1. San Diego: Academic Press; 1989.
70. Bhatia S, Goldberg EP, Enns JB. Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). CLAO J 1997;23:264-9.
71. Grobe GL III, Valint PL Jr, Ammon DM Jr. Surface chemical structure for soft contact lenses as a function of polymer processing. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:45-54.
72. Maldonado-Codina C, Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the surface characteristics of hydro-gel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:396-404.
73. Guryca V, Hobzova R, Pradny M, Sirc J, Michalek J. Surface morphology of contact lenses probed with microscopy techniques. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:215-22.
74. Baguet J, Sommer F, Duc TM. Imaging surfaces of hydrophilic contact lenses with the atomic force microscope. Biomaterials 1993;14:279-84.
75. Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthal-mol Vis Sci 2008;49:120-4.
76. Lorentz H, Rogers R, Jones L. The impact of lipid on contact angle wettability. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:946-53.
77. Zhang S, Borazjani RN, Salamone JC, Ahearn DG, Crow SA Jr, Pierce GE. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafil-con A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2005;28:113-9.
78. Krebs MR, Wilkins DK, Chung EW, Pitkeathly MC, Chamberlain AK, Zurdo J, Robinson CV, Dobson CM. Formation and seeding of amyloid fibrils from wild-type hen lysozyme and a peptide fragment from the beta-domain. J Mol Biol 2000;300:541-9.
79. Chiti F, Webster P, Taddei N, Clark A, Stefani M, Ramponi G, Dobson CM. Designing conditions for in vitro formation of amyloid protofilaments and fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96: 3590-4.