Impact of a rinse step on protein removal from silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 943-947

  Pucker, Andrew D ^a   Nichols, Jason J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact lenses; Protein quantification; Rinse solution; Silicone hydrogel; Tear film

Indexed keywords

ACETONITRILE SOLUTIONS; CHEMICAL EXTRACTIONS; CIBA VISIONS; MULTI-PURPOSE; PROTEIN QUANTIFICATION; PROTEIN REMOVAL; REPEATED MEASURES; RINSE SOLUTION; SILICONE HYDROGEL; SILICONE HYDROGELS; TEAR FILM; TEAR FILMS; TRIFLUOROACETIC ACIDS;

ACETONITRILE; CONTACT LENSES; HYDROGELS; METAL RECOVERY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SILICONES; SMELTING;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

ACETONITRILE; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; PROTEIN; TEAR FILM PROTEIN; TRIFLUOROACETIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CLEANING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; OPEN STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SILICONE HYDROGEL CONTACT LENS; TEAR FILM;

ADULT; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; EYE PROTEINS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; HYDROGELS; HYGIENE; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICONES; WATER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350118066     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181b2f417     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rosenthal RA, Henry CL, Stone RP, Schlech BA. Anatomy of a regimen: consideration of multipurpose solutions during noncompliant use. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2003;26:17-26.
2. Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;83:697-708.
3. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937-941
4. Nilsson SE, Andersson L. Contact lens wear in dry environments. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986;64:221-225
5. Taylor RL, Willcox MD, Williams TJ, Verran J. Modulation of bacterial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:23-29
6. Zhao Z, Wei X, Aliwarga Y, Carnt NA, Garrett Q, Willcox MD. Proteomic analysis of protein deposits on worn daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Mol Vis 2008;14:2016-2024
7. Green-Church KB, Nichols JJ. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition. Mol Vis 2008;14:291-297
8. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138-143
9. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004; 28:25-36. (Pubitemid 38161171)
10. Emch AJ, Nichols JJ. Proteins identified from care solution extractions of silicone hydrogels. Optom Vis Sci 2009;82:123-131
11. Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, Azeredo J. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:183-188
12. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006;31:787-796
13. Lord MS, Stenzel MH, Simmons A, Milthorpe BK. The effect of charged groups on protein interactions with poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2006;27:567-575
14. Soltys-Robitaille CE, Ammon DM Jr, Valint PL Jr, Grobe GL III. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials 2001;22:3257-3260
15. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77:503-510
16. Hart DE. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:616-617
17. Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, Franklin V, Tighe B. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997;23:122-126
18. Nichols JJ. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:751-757
19. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976;72:248-254
20. Williams TJ, Willcox MD, Schneider RP. Interactions of bacteria with contact lenses: the effect of soluble protein and carbohydrate on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:266-271
21. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217-3224
22. Kodjikian L, Casoli-Bergeron E, Malet F, Janin-Manificat H, Freney J, Burillon C, Colin J, Steghens JP. Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:267-273
23. Mok KH, Cheung RW, Wong BK, Yip KK, Lee VW. Effectiveness of no-rub contact lens cleaning on protein removal: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:468-470
24. Rosenthal RA, Henry CL, Schlech BA. Contribution of regimen steps to disinfection of hydrophilic contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2004;27:149-156