Clinical discussion on the relative efficacy of 2 surfactant-containing lubricating agents in removing proteins during contact lens wear

Optometry

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 23-29

  Caron, Patrick ^a   St Jacques, Jahel ^a   Michaud, Langis ^b  

^a Montmagny   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Comfort drops; Contact lens; Deposits; Protein

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; ETAFILCON; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PROTEIN; SURFACTANT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; LUBRICATION; MALE; MYOPIA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUBRICATION; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MYOPIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROTEINS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33845943532     PISSN: 15291839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2006.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Guillon M., Allary J.-C., Guillon J.-P., et al. Clinical management of regular replacement: Part I. Selection of replacement frequency. International Contact Lens Clinic 19 (1992) 104-120
2. Meisler D.M., and Keller W.B. Contact lens type, material, and deposits and giant papillary conjunctivitis. CLAO J 21 1 (1995) 77-79
3. Leahy C.D., Mandell R.B., and Lin S.T. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 67 7 (1990) 504-511
4. Porazinski A.D., and Donshik P.C. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. CLAO J 25 3 (1999) 142-147
5. Michaud L., and Giasson C. Overwear of contact lenses: increased severity of clinical signs as a function of protein adsorption. Optom Vis Sci 79 3 (2002) 184-192
6. Barr J.T., Dugan P.R., Reindel W.R., et al. Protein and elemental analysis of contact lenses of subjects with superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis or giant papillary conjunctivitis. Optom Vis Sci 66 3 (1989) 133-140
7. Skotnitsky C., Sankaridurg P.R., Sweeney D.F., et al. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 85 3 (2002) 193-197
8. Ky W., Scherick K., and Stenson S. Clinical survey of lens care in contact lens subjects. CLAO J 24 4 (1998) 216-219
9. Malet F., Karsenti D., and Pouliquen P. Preservative-free ocular hydrating agents in symptomatic contact lens wearers: saline versus PVP solution. Eye Contact Lens 29 1 (2003) 38-43
10. Hom M., and Simmons P. In-eye contact lens cleaners. Contact Lens Spectrum (2002) 33-38 17(7)
11. Lebow K.A., et al. Can a lens drop minimize deposits and increase comfort?. Contact Lens Spectrum 18 1 (2003) 42-46
12. Bontempo A.R., and Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAOJ 27 2 (2001) 75-80
13. Jones L., Mann A., Evans K., et al. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 77 10 (2000) 503-510
14. Minno G.E., Eckel L., Groemminger S., et al. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 68 11 (1991) 865-872
15. Maïssa C., Franklin V., Guillon M., et al. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 75 9 (1998) 697-705
16. Guillon M., and Maissa C. Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing. CLAO J 28 4 (2002) 186-191
17. Peterson G.L. A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al. which is more generally applicable. Anal Biochem 83 (1977) 346-356
18. Ward M.A., et al. Soft contact lens care products. Contact Lens Spectrum 18 7 (2003) 27-28
19. Timberlake G.T., Doane M.G., and Bertera J.H. Short-term, low-contrast visual acuity reduction associated with in vivo contact lens drying. Optom Vis Sci 69 10 (1992) 755-760
20. Thay L.C., Tomlinson A., and Ridder W.H. Contact lens drying and visual performance: the vision cycle with contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 79 6 (2002) 381-388
21. Gellatly K.W., Brennan N.A., and Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65 12 (1988) 937-941
22. Ridder III W.H., and Tomlinson A. The effect of artificial tears on visual performance in normal subjects wearing contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 80 12 (2003) 826-831
23. Epstein A.B. Improving comfort in soft lens wearers reporting dryness: differences in rewetting drop effectiveness (2003) Presented as a multimedia poster at the SECO International 2003, Atlanta, Georgia, February 20-23