Proteomic analysis of protein deposits on worn daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Molecular Vision

Volumn 14, Issue , 2008, Pages 2016-2024

  Zhao, Zhenjun ^a,b,c   Wei, Xiaojia ^a,c   Aliwarga, Yulina ^a,c   Carnt, Nicole A ^a,c   Garrett, Qian ^a,b,c   Willcox, Mark D P ^a,b,c  

^a BRIEN HOLDEN VISION INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c VISION COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIPOCALIN; LYSOZYME; PROTEIN; SILICONE; SURFACTANT; TRYPSIN; UREA;

ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; HYDROGEL; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEOMICS; SILICONE PROSTHESIS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TEAR FILM;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; EYE PROTEINS; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOMICS; SILICONES;

EID: 56149101974     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10900535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Stapleton F, Keay L, Jalbert I, Cole N. The epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84:257-72.
2. Willcox MD, Holden BA. Contact lens related corneal infections. Biosci Rep 2001; 21:445-61.
3. Jones LW, Jones DA. Non-inflammatory corneal complications of contact lens wear.. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2001; 24:73-9.
4. Dumbleton K. Noninflammatory silicone hydrogel contact lens complications. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29:S186-9.
5. Fonn D. Targeting contact lens induced dryness and discomfort: what properties will make lenses more comfortable. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84:279-85.
6. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77:503-10.
7. Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49:120-4.
8. Luensmann D, Jones L. Albumin adsorption to contact lens materials: A review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2008; 31:179-87.
9. Lorentz H, Rogers R, Jones L. The impact of lipid on contact angle wettability. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84:946-53.
10. Tan ME, Demirci G, Pearce D, Jalbert I, Sankaridurg P, Willcox MD. Contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis is associated with increased albumin deposits on extended wear hydrogel lenses. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002; 506:951-5.
11. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly Group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73:16-21.
12. Lorentz H, Jones L. Lipid deposition on hydrogel contact lenses: how history can help us today. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84:286-95.
13. Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Doane MG. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81:194-204.
14. Butrus SI, Klotz SA. Contact lens surface deposits increase the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cuff Eye Res 1990; 9:717-24.
15. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes i, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29:S75-9.
16. Sweeney DF, editor. Silicone hydrogels: the rebirth of continuous wear contact lenses. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2000.
17. Guillon M, Maissa C. Use of silicone hydrogel material for daily wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007; 30:5-10.
18. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens 2006; 32:281-6.
19. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007; 26:168-74.
20. Stevenson RW, Seal DV. Has the introduction of multi-purpose solutions contributed to a reduced incidence of Acanthamoeba keratitis in contact lens wearers? A review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1998; 21:89-92.
21. Mok KH, Cheung RW, Wong BK, Yip KK, Lee VW. Effectiveness of no-rub contact lens cleaning on protein removal: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81:468-70.
22. Caron P, St-Jacques J, Michaud L. Clinical discussion on the relative efficacy of 2 surfactant-containing lubricating agents in removing proteins during contact lens wear. Optometry 2007; 78:23-9.
23. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006; 31:787-96.
24. Okada E, Matsuda T, Yokoyama T, Okuda K. Lysozyme penetration in Group IV soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2006; 32:174-7.
25. Maziarz EP, Stachowski MJ, Liu XM, Mosack L, Davis A, Musante C, Heckathorn D. Lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel lenses, part I: quantification of oleic Acid, oleic Acid methyl ester, and cholesterol, Eye Contact-Lens 2006; 32:300-7.
26. Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett RW. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41:1687-95.
27. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40:897-903.
28. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989; 15:185-8.
29. de Souza GA, Godoy LM, Mann M. Identification of 491 proteins in the tear fluid proteome reveals a large number of proteases and protease inhibitors. Genome Biol 2006; 7:R72.
30. Mann AM, Tighe BJ. The application of counter immunoelectrophoresis (CIE) in ocular protein studies Part II: Kinin activity in the lens wearing eye. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2002; 25:81-8.
31. Tighe BJ, Franklin V, Graham C, Mann A, Guillon M. Vitronectin adsorption in contact lens surfaces during wear. Locus and significance. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998; 438:769-73.
32. Higgs RE, Knierman MD, Gelfanova V, Butter JP, Hale JE. Label-free LC-MS method for the identification of biomarkers. Methods Mol Biol 2008; 428:209-30.
33. Zhao Z, Carbt NA, Aliwarga Y, Wei X, Naduvilath T, Garrett Q, Korth J, Willcox MDP. Care regimen & lens material influence on in-vivo contact lens deposition. Optom Vis Sci. 2008In press
34. Herbert BR, Molloy MP, Gooley AA, Walsh BJ, Bryson WG, Williams KL. Improved protein solubility in two-dimensional electrophoresis using tributyl phosphine as reducing agent. Electrophoresis 1998; 19:845-51.
35. Gatlin CL, Kleemann GR, Hays LG, Link AJ, Yates JR. Protein identification at the low femtomole level from silver-stained gels using a new fritless electrospray interface for liquid chromatography-microspray and nanospray mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 1998; 263:93-101.
36. Morgan PB, Efron N. A decade of contact lens prescribing trends in the United Kingdom (1996-2005). Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29:59-68.
37. Stenson S. Soft contact lens deposits. JAMA 1987; 257:2823.
38. Brennan NA, Coles ML. Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens wear. Int Contact Lens Clin 2000; 27:75-100.
39. Garrett Q, Milthorpe BK. Human serum albumin adsorption on hydrogel contact lenses in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37:2594-602.
40. Luensmann D, Glasier MA, Zhang F, Bantseev V, Simpson T, Jones L. Confocal microscopy and albumin penetration into contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84:839-47.
41. Fowler SA, Korb DR, Allansmith MR. Deposits on soft contact lenses of yarious water contents. CLAO J 1985; 11: 124-7.
42. Brash JL, Ten Hove P. Protein adsorption studies on standard polymeric materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1993. 4:591-9
43. Minno GE, Eckel L, Groemminger S. Minno B, Wrzosek T. contact lenses: I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68:865-72.
44. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A. Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28-842-9.
45. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16:776-81.
46. Tighe B. Silicone Hydrogels - What are they and how should they be used in everyday practice? Optician 1999; 218:31-2.
47. Garrett Q, Chatelier RC, Griesser HJ, Milthorpe BK. Effect of charged groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 1998; 19:2175-86.
48. Glasier MA, Keech A, Sheardown H, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Conformational and quantitative characterization of lysozyme extracted from galyfilcon and senofilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2008; 33:1-11.
49. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J 2001; 27:75-80.
50. Green-Church KB, Nichols JJ. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition. Mol Vis 2008; 14:291-7.
51. Baguet J, Sommer F, Claudon-Eyl V, Due TM. Characterization of lacrymal component accumulation on worn soft contact lens surfaces by atomic force microscopy. Biomaterials 1995; 16:3-9.
52. Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, Azeredo J. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007; 30:183-8.
53. Sack RA, Sathe S, Hackworth LA, Willcox MD, Holden BA, Morris CA. The effect of eye closure on protein and complement deposition on Group IV hydrogel contact lenses: relationship to tear flow dynamics. Curr Eye Res 1996; 15:1092-100.
54. Richard NR, Anderson JA, Tasevska ZG, Binder PS. Evaluation of tear protein deposits on contact lenses from patients with and without giant papillary conjunctivitis. CLAO J 1992; 18:143-7.
55. Zhao Z, Fu H, Skotnitsky CC, Sankaridurg PR, Willcox MD. IgE antibody on worn highly oxygen-permeable silicone hydrogel contact lenses from patients with contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34:117-21.
56. Mochizuki H, Yamada M, Hatou S, Kawashima M, Hata S. Deposition of lipid, protein, and secretory phospholipase A2 on hydrophilic contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34:46-9.