The combination of glycerol metabolic engineering and drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve very-high-gravity fermentation performances of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 108, Issue , 2012, Pages 203-210

  Wang, Pin Mei ^a   Zheng, Dao Qiong ^a   Liu, Tian Zhe ^a   Tao, Xiang Lin ^a   Feng, Ming Guang ^a   Min, Hang ^a   Jiang, Xin Hang ^a   Wu, Xue Chang ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Genome shuffling; Glycerol; Metabolic engineering; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Very high gravity fermentation

Indexed keywords

BREEDING TECHNOLOGY; BY-PRODUCT FORMATION; DRUG RESISTANCE; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; ETHANOL TOLERANCE; ETHANOL YIELD; FERMENTATION RATE; GENETIC MODIFICATIONS; GENOME SHUFFLING; INDUSTRIAL STRAIN; INDUSTRIAL YEAST; STRESS TOLERANCE;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENES; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLYCEROL; INDUSTRY; METABOLIC ENGINEERING;

YEAST;

GLYCERALDEHYDE 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; GLYCEROL;

ALCOHOL; DRUG RESISTANCE; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOME; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE; METABOLISM; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TOLERANCE; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; DNA MODIFICATION; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETIC ENGINEERING AND GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENOME SHUFFLING; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS; VERY HIGH GRAVITY FERMENTATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DNA PRIMERS; DRUG RESISTANCE, FUNGAL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASES; GLYCEROL; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MUTAGENESIS; PLASMIDS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84857239031     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.147     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alper H., Moxley J., Nevoigt E., Fink G.R., Stephanopoulos G. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science 2006, 314:1565-1568.
2. Bai F.W., Anderson W.A., Moo-Young M. Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26:89-105.
3. Bajwa P.K., Pinel D., Martin V.J.J., Trevors J.T., Lee H. Strain improvement of the pentose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis by genome shuffling. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 81:179-186.
4. Boyd D.A., Cvitkovitch D.G., Hamilton I.R. Sequence, expression, and function of the gene for the nonphosphorylating, NADP-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177:2622-2627.
5. Bro C., Regenberg B., Forster J., Nielsen J. In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Metab. Eng. 2006, 8:102-111.
6. +-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases from Streptococcus mutans. J. Biol. Chem. 1979, 254:1134-1142.
7. Cullen D., Leong S., Wilson L., Henner D. Transformation of Aspergillus nidulans with the hygromycin-resistance gene, hph. Gene 1987, 57:21-26.
8. Ding J., Huang X., Zhang L., Zhao N., Yang D., Zhang K. Tolerance and stress response to ethanol in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 85:253-263.
9. Erten H., Tanguler H. Influence of Williopsis saturnus yeasts in combination with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on wine fermentation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 50:474-479.
10. Güldener U., Heck S., Fielder T., Beinhauer J., Hegemann J.H. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24:2519-2524.
11. Gibson B.R., Lawrence S.J., Leclaire J.P., Powell C.D., Smart K.A. Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 31:535-569.
12. Gietz R.D., Schiestl R.H. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat. Protocl. 2007, 2:31-34.
13. Giudici P., Solieri L., Pulvirenti A.M., Cassanelli S. Strategies and perspectives for genetic improvement of wine yeasts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 66:622-628.
14. Gueldener U., Heinisch J., Koehler G.J., Voss D., Hegemann J.H. A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30:e23.
15. Guo Z., Zhang L., Ding Z., Wang Z., Shi G. Interruption of glycerol pathway in industrial alcoholic yeasts to improve the ethanol production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82:287-292.
16. Hou L. Improved production of ethanol by novel genome shuffling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160:1084-1093.
17. Medina V.G., Almering M.J., van Maris A.J., Pronk J.T. Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76:190-195.
18. Nissen T., Kielland-Brandt M., Nielsen J., Villadsen J. Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab. Eng. 2000, 2:69-77.
19. Odumeru J.A., D'Amore T., Russell I., Stewart G.G. Effects of heat shock and ethanol stress on the viability of a Saccharomyces uvarum (carlsbergensis) brewing yeast strain during fermentation of high gravity wort. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1992, 10:111-116.
20. Patnaik R., Louie S., Gavrilovic V., Perry K., Stemmer W.P., Ryan C.M., del Cardayre S. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20:707-712.
21. Pereira F.B., Guimaraes P.M., Teixeira J.A., Domingues L. Optimization of low-cost medium for very high gravity ethanol fermentations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using statistical experimental designs. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7856-7863.
22. Petri R., Schmidt-Dannert C. Dealing with complexity: evolutionary engineering and genome shuffling. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004, 15:298-304.
23. Piper P.W. The heat shock and ethanol stress responses of yeast exhibit extensive similarity and functional overlap. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995, 134:121-127.
24. Stephanopoulos G. Metabolic engineering by genome shuffling. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20:666-668.
25. Tamas M.J., Luyten K., Sutherland F.C., Hernandez A., Albertyn J., Valadi H., Li H., Prior B.A., Kilian S.G., Ramos J., Gustafsson L., Thevelein J.M., Hohmann S. Fps1p controls the accumulation and release of the compatible solute glycerol in yeast osmoregulation. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 31:1087-1104.
26. Theerarattananoon K., Lin Y.H., Peng D.Y. Metabolic heat evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown under very-high-gravity conditions. Process Biochem. 2008, 43:1253-1258.
27. Turhan I., Bialka K.L., Demirci A., Karhan M. Ethanol production from carob extract by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:5290-5296.
28. Valadi H., Larsson C., Gustafsson L. Improved ethanol production by glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 50:434-439.
29. Wang P.M., Zheng D.Q., Ding R., Chi X.Q., Tao X.L., Min H., Wu X.C. Improvement of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by hetero-expression of GAPN and FPS1 deletion. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 86:1205-1210.
30. Wei P., Li Z., He P., Lin Y., Jiang N. Genome shuffling in the ethanologenic yeast Candida krusei to improve acetic acid tolerance. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2008, 49:113.
31. Zhang A., Kong Q., Cao L., Chen X. Effect of FPS1 deletion on the fermentation properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44:212-217.
32. Zhao X.Q., Bai F.W. Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 144:23-30.
33. Zheng D.Q., Wu X.C., Tao X.L., Wang P.M., Li P., Chi X.Q., Li Y.D., Yan Q.F., Zhao Y.H. Screening and construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with improved multi-tolerance and bioethanol fermentation performance. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:3020-3027.